Search

Abstract. Stern N, Grosskopf I, Shapira I, Kisch E, Isaacov A, Limor R, Baz M, Leshem Y, Flatau E, Miller A, Greenman Y (Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv; Kupat Holim Klalit, Tel Aviv; Haemek Hospital, Afula; and Kupat Holim Klalit, Afula, Israel). Risk factor clustering in hypertensive patients: impact of the reports of NCEP-II and second joint task force on coronary prevention on JNC-VI guidelines. J Intern Med 2000; 248: 203–210. Introduction. Although the association of hypertension with established risk factors has been noted in several population studies, the recent redefinition of dyslipidaemia, hypertension and diabetes calls for reassessment of the prevalence and pattern of risk factor clusters in essential hypertension. Objective. To analyse the risk factor profile of Israeli patients with essential hypertension seen by primary care physicians and in hypertension specialty clinics, based on current definitions of dyslipidaemia hypertension and diabetes and JNC-VI guidelines for the assessment of risk factors. Design and Setting. We analysed the risk profile of 324 Israeli hypertensive subjects using the JNC-VI risk table and risk grouping. A total of 122 consecutive patients were recruited from primary care clinics and 212 consecutive patients were recruited from a hospital based hypertension clinic. Results. Amongst hypertensive individuals with no known target organ damage, only 1.5% had no risk factors other than hypertension, whereas all hypertensives with coronary artery disease had additional risk factors. Of the six listed major JNC-VI risk factors (smoking, dyslipidaemia, diabetes, age, sex, family history of cardiovascular disease), hypertensive subjects without coronary artery disease (coronary artery disease-negative) had 3.02 ± 0.10 risk factors, whereas hypertensive subjects with coronary artery disease (coronary artery disease positive) had 3.6 ± 0.07 risk factors other than hypertension (P < 0.01). Dyslipidaemia defined by NCEP-II criteria was the most common associated risk factor identified in 93% of coronary artery disease-positive and 77% of the coronary artery disease-negative hypertensive subjects. The most common dyslipidaemic abnormality was an increased LDL cholesterol (79.2% of the cohort), followed by hypertriglyceridaemia (31.7%) and low HDL cholesterol (22.3%). Nevertheless, in nearly half of the coronary artery disease-negative patients, LDL cholesterol concentrations were within 30 mg dL–1 of the target levels. The most common dyslipidaemic variant was isolated hypercholesterolaemia (42%), whereas the syndrome X dyslipidaemic combination of hypertriglyceridaemia and low HDL was strikingly uncommon, observed in 2.8% of the coronary artery disease-positive and 0.8% of the coronary artery disease-negative patients. Conclusions. (i) JNC-VI group risk A patients (no risk factors) comprise a very small minority in this cohort (< 5%); (ii) dyslipidaemia is exceedingly common with mild hypercholesterolaemia being the most prevalent variant and hypertriglyceridaemia with low HDL the least common form. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A very rare case of a menstruating infertile woman with isolated luteinizing hormone (LH) hypergonadotrophin-aemia is presented. There were no signs indicating the presence of a pituitary microadenoma, and LH had normal bioactivity and normal molecular weight Likewise, no mutation was detected in the coding region of the LH β-chain gene. In a non-stimulated cycle and a clomiphene citrate cycle, the patient developed an unruptured cyst The patient ovulated and conceived twice following the addition of human chorionic gonadotrophin. A partial resistance at the ovarian LH receptor site, perhaps caused by a mutation, is a possible explanation for these findings. Another possibility is a malfunction in the signal transduc-tion system of LH beyond the receptor level. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The objective of this study was to evaluate whether a combined human growth hormone (HGH) and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) treatment can improve ovulation induction in poor ovarian responders. Ten patients aged 28–43 years and requiring > 25 ampoules of HMG for ovulation were admitted to the study. Pituitary growth hormone reserve was evaluated by clonidine stimulation and insulin tolerance tests before commencement of treatment. The patients underwent one treatment cycle with D-tryptophan-6-luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (-Trp-LHRH) and HMG and another cycle with -Trp-LHRH, HMG and HGH. Serum HGH, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and oestradiol were measured throughout the two treatment cycles and follicular maturation was assessed by ultrasonographic studies. All patients tested showed no elevation of their serum HGH concentration during a clonidine test, but showed an adequate response during insulin tolerance tests. No significant difference was found in the number of HMG ampoules, duration of treatment, number of leading follicles, and serum oestradiol concentration between the two treatment cycles. Co-treatment with HGH and HMG did not improve ovarian performance in poor ovarian responders. No correlation was found between the results of HGH pituitary function tests and the ovarian response to gonadotrophins. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]