Search

The magnetic shielding effectiveness for closed and open shield structures is studied at extremely low frequencies. Analytical solutions are used for simple geometries, while more complex structures are evaluated using a finite-element method. Both highly conductive and ferromagnetic materials are studied, and their different shielding behavior is shown. Ferromagnetic shields give good results for small and closed shields and they also give a large field attenuation at close range to the source for open shield geometries. Highly conductive materials, on the other hand, are found to be suitable for large shield sizes. The attenuation is, however, reduced in the close vicinity of the source. Comparisons of numerical results with analytical calculations and measurements confirmed the high accuracy of the finite-element model. >

The finite element method (FEM) is used for analyzing the shielding effectiveness of an eddy current shield applied to a 10/0.4 kV substation. The influence of the shield extension is studied, and a calculated magnetic field attenuation of 30 dB is obtained for a 5 mm aluminum shield applied on the ceiling and the walls. With a 3D model, the eddy current distribution in the shield is studied, giving guidance for door positioning. Here, the insertion of a door in the shielded wall off the paths of the main eddy currents is found to create only a locally elevated magnetic field. With a simplified 2D model, the influence of shield conductivity is also analyzed. An increase of the conductivity over that of aluminum here gives a limited shielding improvement. >

The directional correlations ofγ-γ andγ-electron cascades in119Sb are measured, in the decay of119mTe. Bothγ-γ andγ-electron directional correlation coefficients are determined for the cascades (energies in keV): 153.5-1212.7, 942.3-270.5, (976.2+979.3)-270.5, 1095.7-270.5 and 1136.8-270.5. For the cascades 912.6-1366.2, 2013.4-270.5 and 2089.9-270.5γ-γ directional correlations are measured. The mixing ratios evaluated are:δ(M2/E1, 153.5 keV)=0.0003±0.0023,δ(E2/M1, 270.5 keV)=-0.39±0.29,δ(E2/M1, 942.3 keV)= −0.26±0.12,δ(E3/M2,1095.7 keV)=−0.01±0.07, andδ(M3/E2,1212.7 keV) =0.004±0.007. The result is compared with theoretical predictions.