Search

Introduction: Consultation audio recordings improve patient decision‐making but are underutilized. Patient‐administered recording apps on mobile devices may increase access, but implementation has not been evaluated. Methods: We conducted a single‐arm study delivering education, coaching, and reminders for patients to record their appointment using a mobile recording app. Patients had progressive, advanced prostate cancer and an upcoming appointment where the option of docetaxel would be discussed. We used the RE‐AIM framework for evaluation. Reach was the proportion of patients who participated. Effectiveness was change in informed decision‐making pre‐ vs. post‐appointment. We used a questionnaire evaluating patient knowledge about docetaxel (0%–100% correct) and the decisional conflict scale‐informed subscale (0 = feels extremely uninformed to 100 = extremely informed) to compare means using the paired t‐test. Adoption was the proportion of providers agreeing to be recorded. Implementation was coordinator adherence to intervention delivery. We conducted semistructured interviews with patients, caregivers, and providers to assess barriers, facilitators, and suggestions for recording implementation. Results: Of 102 patients approached, 50 (49%) patients participated. Mean age was 75 years, 38 (76%) were Non‐Hispanic White, and 43 (86%) had telehealth appointments. Knowledge increased from 44.7% to 49.5% (p = 0.019), particularly about palliative care (42% answering correctly to 60%, p = 0.035). Decisional conflict‐informed subscale increased from 48.9 to 70.9 (p < 0.001). Forty‐three patients (85%) made a recording, of whom 33 (77%) reported the recording helped treatment decision‐making. All 17 providers agreed to be recorded. Coordinator adherence was high. Multi‐level barriers, suggestions, and facilitators mostly related to intervention complexity and stakeholder compatibility. Conclusion: Patient‐administered audio recordings had a positive effect on decision‐making, particularly for palliative care awareness. For broader implementation, efforts should focus on revising institutional policies; teaching patients or caregivers to use existing recording functions on their devices; leveraging artificial intelligence for transcription and summarization; and integrating recording into telehealth technology and electronic patient portals. Trial Registration:https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05127850 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: [177Lu]Lu–PSMA‐617 (177Lu‐PSMA‐617) plus protocol‐permitted standard of care (SOC) prolonged overall survival (OS) and radiographic progression‐free survival (rPFS) versus SOC in patients with prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–positive metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the phase 3 VISION study, in addition to beneficial effects on symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs) and health‐related quality of life (HRQOL). Methods: Post hoc analyses used the full analysis set from the VISION study (N = 831) overall and by randomized treatment arm (177Lu‐PSMA‐617 plus SOC, n = 551; SOC, n = 280). Correlations were determined between OS and rPFS and between rPFS or OS and time to SSE or to worsening HRQOL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Prostate [FACT‐P] and 5‐level EQ‐5D [EQ‐5D‐5L]). Correlation analyses used an iterative multiple imputation copula‐based approach (correlation coefficients [rho] of <0.3 were defined as weak, ≥0.3 and <0.5 as mild, ≥0.5 and <0.7 as moderate, and ≥0.7 as strong). Results: In the overall population, rPFS correlated strongly with OS (rho, ≥0.7). Correlations between rPFS or OS and time to SSE without death were weak or mild. Time to worsening in the FACT‐P total score and emotional and physical well‐being domains correlated mildly or moderately with rPFS and moderately with OS. Correlation coefficients for time‐to‐worsening EQ‐5D‐5L scores were mild to moderate for both rPFS and OS. Correlation coefficients were similar between treatment arms. Conclusions: In this analysis of the VISION study, rPFS correlated strongly with OS but not with time to SSE or worsening HRQOL. These findings require further investigation. In patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer participating in the VISION randomized phase 3 trial, radiographic progression‐free survival correlated strongly with overall survival but not with time to a first symptomatic skeletal event or worsening health‐related quality of life or pain. There were no clear or consistent differences in the strengths of correlation between the two treatment groups ([177Lu]Lu‐PSMA‐617 plus protocol‐permitted standard of care vs. standard of care alone). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: 68Ga-PSMA-11 is recommended for the selection of patients for treatment in the package insert for 177Lu-PSMA-617. We aimed to compare imaging properties and post-treatment outcomes from radioligand therapy (RLT) of patients selected with 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-DCFPyL. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 80 patients undergoing PSMA RLT, who had pretreatment imaging using either 68Ga-PSMA-11 or 18F-DCFPyL. For both groups, we compared the biodistribution and lesion uptake and the PSA response to treatment. Results: Both agents had comparable biodistribution. Patients initially imaged with 18F-DCFPyL had a higher PSA response (66% vs. 42%), and more patients had a PSA50 response (72% vs. 43%) compared to patients imaged with 68Ga-PSMA-11. Conclusion: 18F-DCFPyL and 68Ga-PSMA-11 had comparable biodistribution and lesion uptake. Patients imaged with 18F-DCFPyL demonstrated clinical benefit to PSMA RLT comparable to those imaged with 68Ga-PSMA-11, and either agent can be used for screening patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article presents a case series that investigates the occurrence of central nervous system (CNS) metastasis in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) who were treated with enfortumab vedotin (EV). The study found that CNS metastasis occurred in 13.4% of patients treated with EV, which is higher than previously reported. The most common genetic alterations in these patients were identified. However, the study has limitations due to its small sample size and retrospective analysis. Further research is needed to better understand the relationship between EV treatment and CNS metastasis in mUC patients. [Extracted from the article]

Opinion Statement: There is an acute unmet need to develop novel treatment regimens in the perioperative setting since many patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) are not eligible for the current standard of care (SOC) neoadjuvant treatment with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), both as monotherapy and in combination regimens with other ICIs, chemotherapy, or targeted drugs, may provide safe and clinically effective treatment options that could revolutionize current standard of care. In the neoadjuvant setting, compelling data from phase II clinical trials suggests that single-agent immunotherapy, as well as dual-checkpoint blockade, may emerge as reasonable alternatives to traditional cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Prospective studies combining ICIs with chemotherapy or with antibody-drug conjugates have also demonstrated robust outcomes. However, these studies are not yet practice changing and data from larger randomized studies are needed to confirm this benefit. In the adjuvant setting, nivolumab is the FDA-approved treatment based on a disease-free survival benefit relative to placebo in a randomized trial. However, it will be important to confirm an overall survival benefit of this treatment and to better identify patients who need additional adjuvant treatment based on novel biomarker data. The treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer is moving toward the individualization of treatment options based on specific tumor and patient characteristics and away from the one-size-fits-all approach that has dominated this space for the last couple of decades. Emerging biomarker data, such as with ctDNA, suggests that immunotherapy may confer greater benefit to selected patients. Identifying who those patients are will be of paramount importance since additional treatments always come with additional toxicities. On the other hand, the more favorable toxicity profiles of certain immunotherapy-based regimens may make them superior options for some patients who would otherwise be unable to tolerate other systemic regimens. In the near future, it is likely that subsets of patients with MIBC will be receiving treatments with predominantly immunotherapy-based regimens while many patients may still be treated with regimens containing a cisplatin-based chemotherapy backbone. Currently ongoing clinical trials will help to better define patient populations optimized for each treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To compare clinical outcomes with programmed‐death ligand‐1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) who have vs have not undergone radical surgery (RS) or radiation therapy (RT) prior to developing metastatic disease. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study collecting clinicopathological, treatment and outcomes data for patients with aUC receiving ICIs across 25 institutions. We compared outcomes (observed response rate [ORR], progression‐free survival [PFS], overall survival [OS]) between patients with vs without prior RS, and by type of prior locoregional treatment (RS vs RT vs no locoregional treatment). Patients with de novo advanced disease were excluded. Analysis was stratified by treatment line (first‐line and second‐line or greater [second‐plus line]). Logistic regression was used to compare ORR, while Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox regression were used for PFS and OS. Multivariable models were adjusted for known prognostic factors. Results: We included 562 patients (first‐line: 342 and second‐plus line: 220). There was no difference in outcomes based on prior locoregional treatment among those treated with first‐line ICIs. In the second‐plus‐line setting, prior RS was associated with higher ORR (adjusted odds ratio 2.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]1.19–5.74]), longer OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.61, 95% CI 0.42–0.88) and PFS (aHR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45–0.89) vs no prior RS. This association remained significant when type of prior locoregional treatment (RS and RT) was modelled separately. Conclusion: Prior RS before developing advanced disease was associated with better outcomes in patients with aUC treated with ICIs in the second‐plus‐line but not in the first‐line setting. While further validation is needed, our findings could have implications for prognostic estimates in clinical discussions and benchmarking for clinical trials. Limitations include the study's retrospective nature, lack of randomization, and possible selection and confounding biases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a common malignancy with significant associated mortality. Recent clinical trials suggest an emerging role for HER2-targeted therapy. Testing for HER2 expression in UC is not part of current routine clinical practice. In consequence, the prevalence of HER2 expression in UC is not well defined. Methods: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to characterize HER2 expression in both locally advanced unresectable or metastatic (LA/mUC) and earlier stage UC, classified as HER2+, HER2-low, HER2-. HER2+ was defined as an immunohistochemistry (IHC) score of 3+ or IHC 2+ and ISH/FISH +. HER2-low was defined as an IHC score of 2+ and ISH/FISH-or IHC 1+. HER2- was defined as an IHC score of 0. Weighted averages were calculated to generate an estimate of the population prevalence. Results: A total of 88 studies were identified, with 45, 30, and 13 studies investigating LA/mUC, earlier stage UC, and mixed stage/unspecified, respectively. The most common assays used were Dako HercepTest and Ventana Pathway anti-HER2/neu (4B5) for IHC to assess HER2 protein expression; Abbott PathVysion HER-2 DNA Probe Kit, FoundationOne CDx, and Guardant360 CDx for assessing HER2 gene amplification. The most frequently cited scoring guidelines were ASCO/CAP guidelines for breast cancer and gastric cancer, though most studies defined their own criteria for HER2 expression. Using the pre-specified definition, HER2+ prevalence ranged from 6.7% to 37.5% with a weighted average of 13.0% in LA/mUC. Only 1 study presented data that could be classified as HER2+ based on pre-specified criteria in earlier stage UC patients, and this study represented a likely outlier, at 76.0%. Conclusion: The results from this SLR help to shed light on HER2 expression in UC, a potentially clinically relevant biomarker-driven subpopulation for emerging HER2-directed regimens. Results of this SLR illuminate the variability in how HER2+ status expression levels are being assessed and how HER2+ is defined. Consensus on standardized HER2 testing and scoring criteria is paramount to better understand the clinical relevance in patients with UC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE Men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer increasingly encounter complex treatment decisions. Consultation audio recordings and summaries promote patient informed decision making but are underutilized. Mobile recording software applications may increase access. Little is known regarding the feasibility of implementation in clinical encounters. METHODS We conducted a mixed-methods pilot study in men with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. We instructed patients to use a mobile software application to record an oncology visit. Patients could share the recording with our patient scribing program to receive a written summary. We assessed feasibility and acceptability with postvisit surveys. We measured patient-reported helpfulness of the intervention in decision making and change in Decisional Conflict Scale-informed subscale. We conducted semistructured interviews to explore implementation and analyzed transcripts using thematic analysis. RESULTS Across 20 patients, 18 (90%) recorded their visits. Thirteen of 18 (72%) listened to the recording, and 14 of 18 (78%) received a summary. Eighteen of 20 (90%) visits were telehealth. Fourteen patients (70% of all 20; 78% of 18 question respondents) found the application easy to use. Nine patients (50% of 18 recording patients; 90% of 10 question respondents) reported that the recording helped treatment decision making. Decisional conflict decreased from baseline to 1-week postvisit (47.4-28.5, P, .001). Interviews revealed benefits, facilitators, contextual factors, and technology and patient-related barriers to recordings and summaries. CONCLUSION In this single-institution academic setting, a mobile application for patients to record consultations was a feasible, acceptable, and potentially valued intervention that improved decision making in the telehealth setting. Studies in larger, diverse populations are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The risks associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its associated illness, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), among patients with a cancer diagnosis have not been fully characterized. This study leverages data from a multi-institutional cohort study, the University of California Cancer COVID Consortium, to evaluate outcomes associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients with cancer. Methods Clinical data were collected from March to November 2020 and included patient demographics, cancer history and treatment, SARS-CoV-2 exposure and testing, and COVID-19 clinical management and outcomes. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression permitting unequal slopes was used to evaluate the impact of demographic, disease, and treatment factors on SARS-CoV-2 related hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and mortality. Findings Among all evaluated patients (n = 303), 147 (48%) were male, 118 (29%) were older adults (≥65 years old), and 104 (34%) were non-Hispanic white. A subset (n = 63, 21%) had hematologic malignancies and the remaining had solid tumors. Patients were hospitalized for acute care (n = 79, 26%), ICU-level care (n = 28, 9%), or died (n = 21, 7%) due to COVID-19. Patients with ≥2 comorbidities were more likely to require acute care (odds ratio [OR] 2.09 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.23-3.55]). Cough was identified as a significant predictor of ICU hospitalization (OR 2.16 [95% CI, 1.03-4.57]). Importantly, mortality was associated with an active cancer diagnosis (OR 3.64 [95% CI, 1.40-9.5]) or advanced age (OR 3.86 [95% CI, 1.2-12.44]). Interpretation This study observed that patients with active cancer or advanced age are at an increased risk of death from COVID-19. These study observations can inform risk counseling related to COVID-19 for patients with a cancer diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become one of the mainstays of systemic therapy for advancedurothelial carcinoma (aUC). Increasingly ICIs are also being utilized earlier in the course of UC treatment. Limited data are available regarding ICI treatment efficacy in aUC patients who have progressed on prior ICI regimens. This case series aims to address this knowledge gap. Patients and Methods: We identified all aUC patients treated with ICI or combination following prior progression on another ICI regimen at two academic institutions. Patient demographic, clinicopathologic and treatment data were retrospectively collected from chart review at each site. Best response to ICI treatment was defined by investigator at each site. Results: Among 7 patients with aUC who received ICI treatment following prior progression on a different ICI regimen, radiographic response to the second ICI regimen was observed in only 1 patient (14%) treated with combination of pembrolizumab/enfortumab vedotin. Conclusion: Efficacy of ICI treatment in patients who previously progressed on another ICI regimen appears limited. These observations should be validated in larger cohorts, as it is anticipated that this clinical scenario will become more common in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is a novel antibody-drug conjugate approved for advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) refractory to prior therapy. In the Urothelial Cancer Network to Investigate Therapeutic Experiences (UNITE) study, the authors looked at the experience with EV in patient subsets of interest for which activity had not been well defined in clinical trials.Methods: UNITE was a retrospective study of patients with aUC treated with recently approved agents. This initial analysis focused on patients treated with EV. Patient data were abstracted from chart reviews by investigators at each site. The observed response rate (ORR) was investigator-assessed for patients with at least 1 post-baseline scan or clear evidence of clinical progression. ORRs were compared across subsets of interest for patients treated with EV monotherapy.Results: The initial UNITE analysis included 304 patients from 16 institutions; 260 of these patients were treated with EV monotherapy and included in the analyses. In the monotherapy cohort, the ORR was 52%, and it was >40% in all reported subsets of interest, including patients with comorbidities previously excluded from clinical trials (baseline renal impairment, diabetes, and neuropathy) and patients with fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) alterations. Progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.8 and 14.4 months, respectively. Patients with a pure urothelial histology had a higher ORR than patients with a variant histology component (58% vs 42%; P = .06).Conclusions: In a large retrospective cohort, responses to EV monotherapy were consistent with data previously reported in clinical trials and were also observed in various patient subsets, including patients with variant histology, patients with FGFR3 alterations, and patients previously excluded from clinical trials with an estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min and significant comorbidities.Lay Summary: Enfortumab vedotin, approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2019, is an important new drug for the treatment of patients with advanced bladder cancer. This study looks at the effectiveness of enfortumab vedotin as it has been used at multiple centers since approval, and focuses on important patient populations previously excluded from clinical trials. These populations include patients with decreased kidney function, diabetes, and important mutations. Enfortumab vedotin is effective for treating these patients. Previously reported clinical trial data have been replicated in this real-world setting, and support the use of this drug in broader patient populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The outcomes of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) have significantly improved through treatment intensification, yet Black representation in those studies is suboptimal. Methods A multi-institutional, retrospective analysis of Black men with mHSPC was conducted, focusing on baseline demographics, treatment patterns, genomic profiles, clinical outcomes including prostate-specific antigen response, time to castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and subsequent treatments. Results A total of 107 patients, median age 64 years, 62% with de novo metastases at diagnosis and 64% with high-volume disease, were included. Twenty-nine patients (27%) were treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with and without first generation anti-androgens, while 20%, 38% and 5% received chemotherapy, abiraterone, and enzalutamide, respectively. At time of data cut-off, 57 (54%) patients had developed CRPC, with a median time to CRPC of 25.4 months (95% CI 20.3-30.4). The median time to CRPC was 46.3 months (18.9-73.7) and 23.4 months (18.6-28.2) for patients who received ADT with or without first-generation anti-androgens and treatment intensification, respectively. The 2-year survival rate was 93.3%, and estimated median overall survival of was 74.9 months (95% CI, 68.7-81.0). Most patients (90%) underwent germline testing; the most frequent known alterations were found within the DNA repair group of genes. Somatic testing revealed pathogenic alterations of interest, notably TP53 (24%) and CDK12 (12%). Conclusion In our cohort, Black men with mHSPC presented with a high proportion of de novo metastases and high-volume disease. Treatment outcomes were very favorable with ADT-based regimens. The genomic landscape suggests different molecular profile relative to White patients with potential therapeutic implications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Exercise may improve clinical and quality of life outcomes for men with prostate cancer. No randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined the feasibility, safety, and acceptability of remote exercise training in men with metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Methods: We conducted a pilot RCT (1:1:1 aerobic or resistance exercise 3x/week or usual care) to determine the feasibility, safety, and acceptability of remotely monitored exercise over 12 weeks in 25 men with mCRPC. A prescribed exercise program was based on baseline testing including high‐ and moderate‐intensity aerobic exercise or resistance exercise completed at a local exercise facility. Feasibility was based on attendance, adherence, and tolerance; safety on adverse events; and acceptability on participant interviews. Results: Between March 2016 and March 2020, 25 patients were randomized (8 aerobic, 7 resistance, and 10 control). Twenty‐three men (82%) completed the 12‐week study. Men who completed the remote intervention attempted 90% and 96% of prescribed aerobic and resistance training sessions, respectively, and 86% and 88% of attempted sessions were completed as or more than prescribed. We observed changes in performance tests that corresponded with the exercise prescription. No safety concerns were identified. Ninety percent of participants interviewed were satisfied with the program and would recommend it to others. Conclusions: Remotely monitored exercise training is feasible, safe, and acceptable in men with mCRPC; there was no difference in these outcomes by mode of exercise. Through this research, we provide direction and rationale for future studies of exercise and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]