Search

Background: Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated encephalomyelitis (MOG-EM; also termed MOG antibody-associated disease, MOGAD) is the most important differential diagnosis of both multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. A recent proposal for new diagnostic criteria for MOG-EM/MOGAD explicitly recommends the use of immunoglobulin G subclass 1 (IgG1)- or IgG crystallizable fragment (Fc) region-specific assays and allows the use of heavy-and-light-chain-(H+L) specific assays for detecting MOG-IgG. By contrast, the utility of MOG-IgG3-specific testing has not been systematically evaluated. Objective: To assess whether the use of MOG-IgG3-specific testing can improve the sensitivity of MOG-IgG testing. Methods: Re-testing of 22 patients with a definite diagnosis of MOG-EM/MOGAD and clearly positive MOG-IgG status initially but negative or equivocal results in H+L- or Fc-specific routine assays later in the disease course (i.e. patients with spontaneous or treatment-driven seroreversion). Results: In accordance with previous studies that had used MOG-IgG1-specific assays, IgG subclass-specific testing yielded a higher sensitivity than testing by non-subclass-specific assays. Using subclass-specific secondary antibodies, 26/27 supposedly seroreverted samples were still clearly positive for MOG-IgG, with MOG-IgG1 being the most frequently detected subclass (25/27 [93%] samples). However, also MOG-IgG3 was detected in 14/27 (52%) samples (from 12/22 [55%] patients). Most strikingly, MOG-IgG3 was the predominant subclass in 8/27 (30%) samples (from 7/22 [32%] patients), with no unequivocal MOG-IgG1 signal in 2 and only a very weak concomitant MOG-IgG1 signal in the other six samples. By contrast, no significant MOG-IgG3 reactivity was seen in 60 control samples (from 42 healthy individuals and 18 patients with MS). Of note, MOG-IgG3 was also detected in the only patient in our cohort previously diagnosed with MOG-IgA+/IgG– MOG-EM/MOGAD, a recently described new disease subvariant. MOG-IgA and MOG-IgM were negative in all other patients tested. Conclusions: In some patients with MOG-EM/MOGAD, MOG-IgG is either exclusively or predominantly MOG-IgG3. Thus, the use of IgG1-specific assays might only partly overcome the current limitations of MOG-IgG testing and—just like H+L- and Fcγ-specific testing—might overlook some genuinely seropositive patients. This would have potentially significant consequences for the management of patients with MOG-EM/MOGAD. Given that IgG3 chiefly detects proteins and is a strong activator of complement and other effector mechanisms, MOG-IgG3 may be involved in the immunopathogenesis of MOG-EM/MOGAD. Studies on the frequency and dynamics as well as the clinical and therapeutic significance of MOG-IgG3 seropositivity are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG) antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are frequently associated with other autoimmune disorders, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Eculizumab (ECU) is a highly effective long-term treatment for NMOSD. However, ECU is known to increase significantly the risk of infection with encapsulated bacteria and sepsis. Recently, increased insulin resistance (IR) in patients with NMOSD has been suggested. Type B IR (TBIR) is a rare autoimmune condition often accompanying or preceding SLE. TBIR has not yet been reported in NMOSD. Objective: To report an ECU-treated patient with AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD who developed fatal septic complications after the emergence of TBIR. Methods: Description of the clinical course over a period of 8 years. Results: A female patient was diagnosed with NMOSD at the age of 16 years. A variety of disease-modifying drugs failed to achieve sufficient disease control, resulting in severe tetraparesis. Treatment with ECU was started 6 years after NMOSD diagnosis and stabilized the disease. The patient developed TBIR 8 months after initiation of ECU therapy. Following high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone therapy for a clinical relapse and three further courses of ECU, the patient was admitted with severe pneumonia caused by the encapsulated bacterium Klebsiella pneumoniae and hypoglycemia. Despite multimodal therapy, the patient died from sepsis-related multiorgan failure 18 months after initiation of ECU. Conclusions: TBIR should be considered as differential diagnosis in patients with NMOSD presenting with disturbed glucose metabolism, irrespective of the presence of SLE. More real-world data are needed on the risk/benefit ratio of ECU treatment in patients who have co-existing autoimmune comorbidities that may compromise immune function. Strategies to mitigate the risk of serious infection in patients treated with ECU are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]