Search

Study Design Narrative review Objectives Multiple classifications have been proposed for sacral fractures since the last century. While initial classifications focussed on vertical and transverse fractures, the recent fracture classifications encompass all injury patterns. In 1990, Isler classified unilateral vertical sacral fractures based on its potential influence on lumbo-sacral joint (LSJ) stability. Methods We re-visited the original description of Isler’s classification of sacral fractures and subsequent studies that have cited it. We will further describe basic LSJ anatomy, evolution of sacral classification systems and the use of Isler’s classification system as it relates to LSJ instability and chronic low back pain. Results Isler described a subset of unilateral vertical sacral fractures where the fracture line exited medial or through the L5-S1 facet joint, based on radiographic review of 193 sacral fractures (incidence -3.5%). He stated that such a fracture should be recognised as it can impede hemi-pelvis reduction and can result in late LSJ instability. The article has been cited in 106 studies and only a few studies have described the incidence of this variant. Nevertheless, the injury is considered as an indication for surgical fixation. Conclusion A review of various classifications indicates that sacral fractures have three important bio-mechanical implications, namely, pelvic ring continuity (vertical fractures), spino-pelvic alignment (high transverse fractures) and lumbo-sacral joint integrity (Isler’s fractures). Though there is a universal recognition of Isler’s fractures and its impact on LSJ integrity, there is a lack of clinical and bio-mechanical evidence regarding the concept of instability caused by a unilateral Isler fracture.

Summary The use of instrumentation for stabilization following cervical trauma has evolved rapidly in the past few decades. Nonoperative maneuvers, including traction, extended bed rest, and cast immobilization, have given way to wiring or screw rod constructs that allow immediate fixation and early mobilization of the patient. These procedures can be performed soon after trauma and with a minimum of surgical risk. They offer immediate stability of the injured spine, and can prevent the sequelae of acute cervical spinal cord injury that may accompany prolonged bed rest, thus allowing early rehabilitation and the potential for improved recovery. Current techniques for posterior cervical spine stabilization following trauma include spinous process or facet wiring [1–9], lateral mass plating [10–18], and cervical pedicle screws [19–27]. Several radiological tools, including MRI [28] and reformatted CT, yield precise details of the injured spine and allow the treating physician to determine which, if any, fixation technique offers the best chance of recovery with the least amount of risk. The goals of surgery following acute cervical spine injury include decompressing the injured spinal cord or nerve root, maintaining alignment, providing stability to the spine, promoting healing and fusion, and allowing early mobilization. This article will review indications for posterior cervical spine surgery, as well as the techniques that are currently available to help achieve the above-noted goals. We also report a recent retrospective review of 5-year data in treating posterior cervical trauma with lateral mass and pedicle screw fixation.