Search

Purpose: To investigate the role of estrogen receptors (ERs) in high‐grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) and clear cell carcinoma (CCC) of the ovary and evaluate ERs as prognostic biomarkers for ovarian cancer. Methods: This study included 79 patients with HGSC (n = 38) or CCC (n = 41) treated at our institution between 2005 and 2014. Immunohistochemistry examined protein expression of ERα, ERβ, and G protein‐coupled estrogen receptor‐1 (GPER‐1); relationships between ERα, ERβ, and GPER‐1 with patient survival were evaluated. Additionally, cell proliferation assay and phosphokinase proteome profiling were performed. Results: In HGSC patients, expression of ERα, cytoplasmic GPER‐1, or nuclear GPER‐1 was associated with poor progression‐free survival (PFS) (P =.041, P =.010, or P =.013, respectively). Cytoplasmic GPER‐1 was an independent prognostic factor for PFS in HGSC patients (HR = 2.83, 95% CI = 1.03‐9.16, P =.007). ER expressions were not associated with prognosis in CCC patients. GPER‐1 knockdown by siRNA reduced the cells number to 60% of siRNA‐control‐treated cells (P <.05), and GPER‐1 antagonist, G‐15 inhibited two HGSC cell lines proliferation (KF and UWB1.289) in a dose‐dependent manner. Phosphoprotein array revealed that GPER‐1 silencing decreased relative phosphorylation of glycogen synthase kinase‐3. Conclusions: High GPER‐1 expression is an independent prognostic factor for PFS in HGSC patients, and GPER‐1 may play a role in HGSC cell proliferation. In HGSC patients, ERα or GPER‐1 expression was associated with poor progression‐free survival (PFS). Cytoplasmic GPER‐1 was an independent prognostic factor for PFS in HGSC patients (P =.007). ER expressions were not associated with prognosis in CCC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: To improve current cancer immunotherapies, strategies to modulate various immunosuppressive cells including myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC) which were shown to be negative factors in immune‐checkpoint blockade therapy, need to be developed. In the present study, we evaluated the role of the local renin‐angiotensin system (RAS) in the tumor immune‐microenvironment using murine models bearing tumor cell lines in which RAS was not involved in their proliferation and angiogenetic ability. Giving angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) to C57BL/6 mice bearing murine colon cancer cell line MC38 resulted in significant enhancement of tumor antigen gp70 specific T cells. ARB administration did not change the numbers of CD11b+ myeloid cells in tumors, but significantly reduced their T‐cell inhibitory ability along with decreased production of various immunosuppressive factors including interleukin (IL)‐6, IL‐10, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and arginase by CD11b+ cells in tumors. ARB also decreased expression of immunosuppressive factors such as chemokine ligand 12 and nitric oxide synthase 2 in cancer‐associated fibroblasts (CAF). Last, combination of ARB and anti‐programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) antibodies resulted in significant augmentation of anti‐tumor effects in a CD8+ T cell‐dependent way. These results showed that RAS is involved in the generation of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment caused by myeloid cells and fibroblasts, other than the previously shown proliferative and angiogenetic properties of cancer cells and macrophages, and that ARB can transform the immunosuppressive properties of MDSC and CAF and could be used in combination with PD‐1/PD‐L1 immune‐checkpoint blockade therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In human cancer cells, a constitutive activation of MAPK, STAT3, b-catenin, and various other signaling pathways triggers multiple immunosuppressive cascades.These cascades result in the production of immunosuppressive molecules (e.g., TGF-b, IL-10, IL-6, VEGF, and CCL2) and induction of immunosuppressive immune cells (e.g., regulatory T cells, tolerogenic dendritic cells, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells). Consequently, immuno-suppressive conditions are formed in tumor-associated microenvironments, including the tumor and sentinel lymph nodes. Some of these cancer-derived cytokines and chemokines impair immune cells and render them immunosuppressive via the activation of signaling molecules, such as STAT3, in the immune cells. Thus, administration of signal inhibitors may inhibit the multiple immunosuppressive cascades by acting simultaneously on both cancer and immune cells at the key regulatory points in the cancer-immune network. Since common signaling pathways are involved in manifestation of several hallmarks of cancer, including cancer cell proliferation/survival, invasion/metastasis, and immunosuppression, targeting these shared signaling pathways in combination with immunotherapy may be a promising strategy for cancer treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cancer-induced immunosuppression is a major problem as it reduces the anti-tumor effects of immunotherapies. In cancer tissues, cancer cells, immune cells, and other stromal cells interact and create an immunosuppressive microenvironment through a variety of immunosuppressive factors. Some cancer subpopulations such as cancer cells undergoing epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem-like cells have immunosuppressive and immunoresistant properties. The production of immunosuppressive factors by cancer cells is mechanistically attributed to oncogenic signals frequently activated in cancer cells, including the STAT3, MAPK, NF-κB, and Wnt/β-catenin signals, which are upstream events leading to immunosuppressive cascades. Moreover, some of these signals are also activated in immunosuppressive immune cells stimulated by cancer-derived factors and contribute to their immunosuppressive activities. Therefore, targeting these signals both in cancer cells and immunosuppressive immune cells may result in the restoration of immunocompetence in cancer patients and improve current immunotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor ( MITF) is a master gene regulating differentiation of melanocytes, and a lineage survival oncogene mediating pro-proliferative function in malignant melanoma. However, high expression of MITF also has an anti-proliferative effect. To clarify the therapeutic implication of MITF as a molecular target for human melanoma, we evaluated the role of MITF in cell proliferation in a panel of human melanoma cell lines which express different levels of MITF. We found that both MITF depletion and forced expression of MITF significantly inhibited proliferation, suggesting that endogenous MITF is regulated at an appropriate level for melanoma cell proliferation, and could be a molecular target for melanoma. However, half of the melanoma cell lines in this study were relatively resistant to MITF depletion, indicating other treatment strategies are required for therapy. Our microarray analysis indicated that regulation of several cell growth–associated molecules may be independent of MITF and dependent on BRAFV600E. Thus to enhance the anti-proliferative effect of MITF down-regulation, we combined shRNA-mediated MITF depletion with BRAFV600E inactivation, another known molecular target for melanoma. Indeed, simultaneous depletion of both MITF and BRAFV600E significantly inhibited melanoma growth even for the melanoma cell lines resistant to MITF depletion. These results suggest MITF may be an important molecular target for human melanoma and simultaneous inhibition of MITF and MAPK signaling may be an attractive strategy for melanoma treatment. ( Cancer Sci 2009; 100: 1863–1869) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

STAT3 signaling constitutes an important negative feedback mechanism for the maintenance of immune homeostasis, a suppressive signal for the Th1 immune response in murine macrophages, and a cancer immune evasion signal in various immune cells. The strategy for STAT3 signal inhibition should be considered, because these features could impede effective cancer immunotherapy. We have evaluated the effects of STAT3 inactivation in dendritic cells (DCs) on immune responses in mice and humans. DCs derived from LysMcre/STAT3flox/flox mice displayed higher cytokine production in response to TLR stimulation, activated T cells more efficiently, and were more resistant to the suppression of cytokine production by cancer-derived immunosuppressive factors compared with DCs from control littermates. Antitumor activities of STAT3-depleted and control DCs were compared by intratumoral administration of gp70 Ag peptide-pulsed DCs in the therapeutic MC38 tumor model. Intratumoral administration of STAT3-depleted DCs significantly inhibited MC38 tumor growth of both injected and nontreated remote tumors. The inhibition was accompanied by an increase in gp70-specific T cell response as well as in systemic Th1 immune response. STAT3-depleted human DCs with adenoviral STAT3 short hairpin RNA were also capable of producing more cytokines with TLR stimulation and more resistant to cancer-derived factors, and they induced tumor Ag-specific T cells more efficiently than control DCs. The identified role of DC STAT3 signaling in both in vivo therapeutic tumor models in mice and in vitro-specific T cell induction in humans indicates that STAT3-inactivated DCs may be a promising approach for cancer immunotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]