Search

This paper aims to investigate and understand the realization of fourth generation human rights, within a chronology and historical line, weighing democratic values and justice as fairness, understood as essential foundations for the process of dynamogenesis to portray the contemporaneity of human rights. From the lessons of John Rawls, one of the catalyzing elements of his theory of justice reverberates, namely, the fact of pluralism and the fragmentation of society that form the public reason of an order, thus indicating acute challenges in the affirmation of a new perspective of justice. and the formation of robust democratic values. It aims to highlight the importance of a new grammar for modern human rights, combining the Rawlsian idea of justice as fairness and democracy as basic values to qualify the protection and guarantee of rights, within a society marked by pluralism. Specifically, it seeks to point out the factors that erode the idea of justice and democracy in the current court of humanity. The research methodology is qualitative, with bibliographic collection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Academia & Derecho is the property of Universidad Libre - Seccional Cucuta and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Esse artigo tem como objetivo analisar o desenho do Prêmio Escola Nota Dez, que faz parte do sistema de incentivos do Programa Aprendizagem na Idade Certa (Paic) do estado do Ceará, à luz dos conceitos de equidade de Rawls e Dubet e dos conceitos de justiça escolar e de discriminação positiva formulados por Crahay e Dubet. Para tanto, são analisados documentos referentes ao Paic, a fim de explicitar como operam esses conceitos na formulação do Prêmio. À luz desses autores, o artigo analisa a forma sui generis de o Prêmio conciliar princípios de meritocracia e de equidade, no âmbito de uma política que, como o Paic, melhora os resultados do desempenho médio dos alunos em Língua Portuguesa e em Matemática, ao mesmo tempo em que consegue reduzir a desigualdade na distribuição social da aprendizagem dentro e entre as escolas das redes municipais de ensino cearenses.

O presente artigo tem o objetivo de discutir os regimes socioeconômicos que permitem a realização da justiça como equidade, focando em especial nos dois regimes apontados por Rawls como capazes de constituir uma sociedade bem ordenada, a democracia de cidadãos proprietários (property-owning democracy ou POD) de um lado e o socialismo liberal do outro. Para tanto, em um primeiro momento serão considerados os argumentos de Rawls a respeito dos regimes socioeconômicos dentro da Uma teoria da justiça. Em seguida, com base em Justiça como equidade: uma reafirmação, serão discutidos os argumentos em favor da POD e do socialismo liberal e contra as outras três opções: capitalismo de laissez-faire, socialismo de Estado dirigido por um partido único e o Estado de bem-estar social. Em seguida, serão considerados os argumentos a favor da POD ou do socialismo liberal, procurando em grande medida traçar quais são as distinções entre ambos os regimes, a partir dos autores que buscam ir além de Rawls. Ao final, conclui-se que nos limites de uma teoria da justiça Rawls está correto ao não definir quem é o regime vencedor, a POD ou o socialismo liberal, mas no avanço atual do capitalismo liberal e no seu movimento de distanciamento das democracias liberais mostra-se necessário discutir qual é o regime mais adequado a partir das bases fornecidas pela justiça como equidade.

O objetivo deste artigo é investigar o escopo do método do equilíbrio reflexivo e sua relação com o conhecimento moral, refletindo sobre o papel deste método na teoria da justiça como equidade de John Rawls. Para tal, iniciamos mostrando a influência do método na filosofia moral e política. Depois, a investigação tem por foco analisar a importância do equilíbrio reflexivo na teoria rawlsiana, destacando o uso do equilíbrio reflexivo estreito e amplo sobretudo nas obras “Outline of a decision procedure for ethics”, A Theory of Justice e “The independence of moral theory” e o uso do equilíbrio reflexivo geral e pleno nas obras Justice as Fairness,Political Liberalism, “Reply to Habermas” e The Law of Peoples. Na parte final do texto, a ideia é defender o equilíbrio reflexivo como um método bastante adequado para a obtenção da objetividade das crenças éticas, podendo ser interpretado como um tipo de conhecimento moral.

Copyright of Revista Direito GV is the property of Fundacao Getulio Vargas and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação is the property of Ensaio: Avaliacao e Politicas Publicas em Educacao and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Artigo que problematiza acerca da responsabilidade do Estado na garantia do direito à saúde à luz da teoria de justiça de John Rawls. Analisa-se, inicialmente, o direito à saúde, sua caracterização e tratamento constitucional. Depois, trata-se da política pública do SUS, bem como de alguns argumentos que negam a garantia do direito à saúde nos moldes concebidos pelo Constituinte. Por fim, com base na teoria de justiça como equidade de John Rawls, delineada na obra Uma teoria da Justiça, suscita-se reflexão envolvendo a responsabilidade do Estado na garantia do direito fundamental social à saúde.

Copyright of Veritas is the property of EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitaria da PUCRS and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Quaestio Iuris (QI) is the property of Editora da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EdUERJ) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This works aim to establish an analogy between Deliberative Democratic Theory from John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas through a comparative analysis. The conceptions developed by these two exponents theoreticians seek to give some thoughts to political pluralism using different justifications. This theme was chosen in order to feed into the discussion on the importance of the legitimacy of the Democratic State. John Rawl's theory sets out substantive democracy, whereas Habermas proposes the procedural one. This paper attempts to outline both theories, without making value judgments, however it intends to highlight points of convergence and divergence. The method used was the deductive bibliographic research relaying on major works from these two authors and on writings an articles from their commentators. In an attempt to shed some light on the debate, primarily this paper discusses Rawl's Theory os Justice as Equity from the point of view of Contractual Theory and its specials characteristics, the original position and the veil of ignorance, public reason and principles of justice. In a second moment, it presents Habermas Procedural Theory, communicative action, public sphere, equiprimordiality between public and private autonomy and Law Discursive Theory. Lastly, this works draws attention to the main points of agreement as well as disagreements emphasizing the importance of the deliberative democracy in democratic countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Quaestio Iuris (QI) is the property of Editora da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EdUERJ) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article analyzes the problem about the recognition of atypical forms of Family, from the John Rawls’ theory of justice as fairness. It presentes Rawls’ concept of Family, developed after Susan Okin contributions. Shows the evolution of family’s concept in western societies to its contemporany notion. Interprets the issue from the political focus of Rawls’ theory, reflecting about the conclusions that can be extracted to the legal-dogmatic field. Concludes that the Constitution should be interpreted broadly; also that there is a need for institutions that can ensure basic rights for these forms of Family.

The relevant question that is proposed in this article is to identify the relationship between the ideas of democracy and justice as fairness, from the principles of freedom and equality for understanding the Right to the City and effective popular participation in our Brazilian reality. For this, we made a brief foray into the concept of the word democracy after outline the contribution of Robert Dahl to this concept as an ideal to be pursued. Therefore, we describe the problem of equality and justice as fairness for the realization of fundamental rights from John Rawls. Analyzes then participatory democracy at the constitutional level and the influence of Paulo Bonavides studies, seeking to elucidate the true meaning and sense of the existence of democracy and participation within the legal system. Later we defend the popular participation and the right to the city as fundamental rights. Finally we expose the conclusions and weave some thoughts.

John Rawls developed his theory of justice as fairness from the notion that it is up to individuals themselves to establish the basic principles of organization of society. The author considers that the members should be in an original position of equality involved by the veil of ignorance, able to avoid the influence of personal conditions in the selection of these criteria. Such principles of justice would legitimize a democratic society, based on freedom and equality (or respect for differences). However, it is common for divergences of interest to arise as a natural consequence of interpersonal relations, a factor that represents a risk to the maintenance of the social arrangement. The purpose of this article is to show that mediation presents itself as a conflict-management mechanism that best embodies Rawls's theory, since it seeks to reestablish the bond between the parties, allowing those involved to peacefully build the solution through active participation in decision-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Brasileira de Estudos Politicos is the property of Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Revista Brasileira de Estudos Politicos) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

O objetivo do presente artigo é realizar uma análise da teoria da justiça como eqüidade de John Rawls em A Theory of Justice e no Political Liberalism, destacando seu modelo de complementaridade entre o deontológico e o procedimental com o teleológico e substancial, buscando responder algumas das críticas levantadas por autores comunitaristas à teoria rawlsiana de justiça e procurando apontar para suas semelhanças. Parto das críticas dos comunitaristas à teoria da justiça como eqüidade; posteriormente, analiso os aspectos teleológicos contidos em seu modelo deontológico; em seguida, destaco a intrínseca relação entre o procedimental e o substancial; por fim, apresento as respostas às críticas comunitaristas à Rawls, destacando a especificidade de sua concepção de justiça.The aim of his article is to characterize the John Rawls's theory of justice as fairness developed in A Theory of Justice (1971), Political Liberalism (1993), Replay to Habermas (1995) and Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (2001), with a view to identifying the convergent points between deontological conception with teleological characteristics and identify a substantive conception of justice, not purely procedural, which is universalist albeit not transcendental, making possible an approach between communitarian and liberal ethical theories.

Copyright of Veritas is the property of EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitaria da PUCRS and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Educação is the property of EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitaria da PUCRS and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Educação is the property of EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitaria da PUCRS and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Among the studies on the Participatory Budgeting (PB) impacts, a line of research has shown its redistributive potential, comprehending it as the consolidation of equality and the difference principle, framework elements of the conception of justice, by John Rawls. Therefore, this article aimes to verify if this potential was achieved in the PB experience of the city of Biguaçu in Santa Catarina, Brazil. The study proves through cross tabulation of the per capita investiment and the Social Vulnerability Index (SoVI) per region, that, in part, the experience promoted justice. However, this promotion was limited by the changes in the institutional design of the experience, which caused a direct impact on the equality reduction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Trans/Form/Ação is the property of Trans/Form/Acao and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)