Search

Resilience is considered a vital characteristic and has gained attention in midwifery practice and education. In particular, midwifery students face challenges during their education in both academic and clinical components of the program. There is need for greater understanding and strategies to develop resilience in the midwifery student population. The aim of this study is to gain insight into how midwifery students conceptualise resilience, and explore how education might support the development of resilience. A focus group was conducted as part of a broader study underpinned by a concept analysis methodology to explore the students understanding of resilience. Participants included six third year midwifery students from one university. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Four key themes were identified. Resilience contextualised to midwifery was triggered by exposure to adversity; resilience was identified as the ability to bounce back and move forward, and was seen to be important for midwifery students. The concept of resilience appears to play an important role in student success. Evidence suggests resilience can be developed and education providers have a role to foster student's resilience. Findings offer strategies to strengthen resilient behaviour for the midwifery student population and provide a basis for further research. Refereed/Peer-reviewed

Clinical placement is a core feature of Australian midwifery education programs, with clinical supervision acknowledged as a key component for student success. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical facilitation models in South Australia, specifically the quality of clinical supervision to facilitate learning, and key stakeholder satisfaction. A mixed method evaluation research design was used to compare three models of clinical facilitation for midwifery students undertaking clinical placement across five venues. Midwifery students (n = 174), across two universities completed an anonymous e-survey utilising the validated Clinical Placement Experience Questionnaire. Midwives (n = 149) across five venues completed an anonymous purpose-designed questionnaire on their experience providing clinical supervision to midwifery students and Clinical Facilitators (n = 8) representing three facilitation models completed a self-report e-diary for two weeks and engaged in a focus group. Few differences were identified between the quality of student support and learning opportunities. Students in all models were well orientated and prepared for the clinical environment. Clinical Facilitators were supportive, educative and valuable for the students to achieve their learning objectives. One significant difference was that facilitators employed in the ‘Shared’ model were more able to provide support to midwives supervising students and maintain good liaison with the universities. Refereed/Peer-reviewed