Fernando Pulido, Bastien Castagneyrol, Francisco Rodríguez‐Sánchez, Yónatan Cáceres, Adara Pardo, Eva Moracho, Johannes Kollmann, Fernando Valladares, Johan Ehrlén, Alistair S. Jump, Jens‐Christian Svenning, Arndt Hampe, Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (España), Natural Environmental Research Council, Institut National de Recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement, Universidad de Sevilla, and Danish National Research Foundation
[Aim]: Range shifts are expected to occur when populations at one range margin per-form better than those at the other margin, yet no global trend in population per-formances at range margins has been demonstrated empirically across a wide range of taxa and biomes. Here we test the prediction that, if impacts of ongoing climate change on performance in marginal populations are widespread, then populations from the high- latitude margin (HLM) should perform as well as or better than central populations, whereas low- latitude margin (LLM) populations should perform worse., [Location]: Global., [Time period]: 1995–2019., [Major taxa studied]: Plants and animals., [Methods]: To test our prediction, we used a meta-analysis to quantify empirical sup-port for asymmetry in the performance of high- and low- latitude margin populations compared to central populations. Performance estimates (survival, reproduction, or lifetime fitness) for populations occurring in their natural environment were derived from 51 papers involving 113 margin-centre comparisons from 54 species and 705 populations from the Americas, Europe, Africa and Australia. We then related these performance differences to climatic differences among populations. We also tested whether patterns are consistent across taxonomic kingdoms (plants vs animals) and across realms (marine vs terrestrial)., [Results]: Populations at margins performed significantly worse than central popula-tions, and this trend was primarily driven by the low- latitude margin. Although the dif-ference was of small magnitude, it was largely consistent across biological kingdoms and realms. Differences in performance were weakly (p= .08) related to the differ-ence in average temperatures between central and marginal populations., [Main conclusions]: The observed asymmetry in performance in marginal populations is consistent with predictions about the effects of global climate change, though fur-ther research is needed to confirm the effect of climate. It indicates that changes in demographic rates in marginal populations can serve as early-warning signals of impending range shifts, This study was funded by Nord Forsk grant no. 80167 to the NORA Consortium (Nordic Network for the Study of Species Range Dynamics, 2009–2012), by projects POPULIM (CGL2010-22180) and PERSLIM (CGL2010-18381) of the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, the EU ERA- net BiodivERsA project BeFoFu (via funding to ASJ by Natural Environmental Research Council grant NE/G002118/1) and the Institut National de Recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement Assessing Climate Change Adaptation Framework project FORADAPT. FRS was funded by a postdoctoral fellow-ship from the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (FPD2013-16756) and a Talent Attraction grant from the VI Plan Propio de Investigación at Universidad de Sevilla (VIPPIT-2018- IV.2). JCS considers this work a contribution to his VILLUM Investigator project ‘Biodiversity Dynamics in a Changing World’, funded by VILLUM FONDEN (grant 16549), and Center for Ecological Dynamics in a Novel Biosphere (ECONOVO), funded by Danish National Research Foundation (grant DNRF173).