Search

Aims: Research in diabetes‐related foot conditions (DRFC) often focuses on ulcer‐related care, whilst the patient experience and influence of sociodemographic factors are under‐researched. This systematic review investigated patient‐reported outcomes and experience in people with DRFC. Methods: Multiple databases were searched from inception to 16 August 2023. All original articles that assessed any patient‐reported outcome or experience in DRFC and reported participant ethnicity were included. Data were synthesized using a sequential contingent approach. Study quality was assessed using study design‐specific tools. Results: Twenty‐three studies were included (11 qualitative, 11 quantitative and one mixed‐methods). DRFC had a largely negative impact on various life dimensions, including social and daily life, work, emotional and psychological well‐being, necessitating dependence on others in the form of emotional, social and/or religious support, which were experienced differently by different groups. Patient DRFC knowledge and self‐care habits were typically suboptimal, and levels of hope and feeling of control over their condition varied between groups. Outcomes varied slightly between ethnicities across studies, with some ethnicity‐specific themes identified such as beliefs about disease cause and footwear habits. Quantitative and qualitative findings were mostly congruent. Conclusions: DRFC profoundly and negatively impacts patient‐reported outcomes and experience, with limited evidence suggesting an influence of ethnicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Globally, there is a growing number of people who are living with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs). Due to complex management needs, it is imperative that research consists of participants who may benefit most from interventions. It is well documented that ethnic minority groups and lower socioeconomic status (SES) groups are at an increased risk of developing MLTCs. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to determine the level of reporting and representation of underserved groups (ethnic minority and low SES) in intervention studies addressing MLTCs. Design: Systematic review. Four databases including Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CINAHL and Scopus were searched for intervention studies from North America or Europe published between January 1990 and July 2023. Setting: Hospital and community-based interventions. We included interventional studies focusing on improving MLTC-related outcomes. Participants: Patients with MLTCs. Main outcome measures: Total number of studies reporting on ethnicity and SES. Number and proportion of studies reporting by ethnic/SES group. Results: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Only 4 of 13 studies (31%) recorded and reported ethnicity information. Of these four studies that reported on ethnicity, three studies consisted of primarily White participants. Ethnic minority groups were underrepresented, but one study included a majority of African American participants. Moreover, 12 of 13 studies (92%) reported on SES with income and educational level being the primary measures used. SES representation of higher deprivation groups was varied due to limited data. Conclusions: For ethnicity, there was a lack of reporting, and ethnic minority groups were underrepresented in intervention studies. For SES, there was a high level of reporting but the proportion of study samples from across the spectrum of SES varied due to the variety of SES measures used. Findings highlight a need to improve the reporting and representation of ethnic minority groups and provide more detailed information for SES through using consistent measures (e.g. education, income and employment) to accurately determine the distribution of SES groups in intervention studies of people with MLTCs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]