Search

129 chronic alcoholic patients, withdrawn from alcohol and presenting major depression or dysthymic disorder, were treated for 4-8 weeks under double-blind conditions either with a new antidepressant, tianeptine (37.5 mg per day), or with amitriptyline (75 mg per day). Both groups presented steady improvement of the symptoms of depression during treatment, as scored on the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist self-evaluation; for the latter scale, the improvement was significantly greater in the tianeptine group. In addition to the improvement of mood, tianeptine also produced significant reduction of the somatic complaints of the depressed patients. Furthermore, tianeptine possesses anxiolytic activity, as shown by the change of the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale global score, similar to that produced by amitriptyline. The anxiolytic activity of tianeptine was not accompanied by any impairment of vigilance, unlike that of amitriptyline. Tianeptine produced rare, mild anticholinergic effects. The results obtained show that tianeptine is an effective anxiolytic antidepressant, with better safety than amitriptyline, suitable for use in the treatment of mood disorders following alcohol withdrawal.

It has been known for some years that a partial deglycosylation of transferrin occurs in the sera of alcohol abusers. Different methods have been proposed in order to evaluate this carbohydrate-deficient fraction of serum transferrin. Chromatofocusing or isoelectric focusing followed by direct immunofixation have been used until now. Recently, a new method called the carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) test based on ion-exchange chromatography has been developed by Stibler et al. (Alcohol Clin Exp Res 10:535-544, 1986). Here we compare this new method with results obtained using our Tf index determination method. The upper limit of normal values was set to the 90th percentile of the values observed in a reference population. The population under investigation consisted of 50 healthy volunteers and 160 alcohol abusers whose ethanol consumption was evaluated through a questionnaire. Sensitivity and specificity of the CDT test have been found higher than 0.76 and 0.90, respectively. The correlation between both methods was 0.794, a satisfactory result considering that the CDT test and the Tf index do not exactly measure the same part of the carbohydrate-deficient transferrin. In a population of 23 patients with liver diseases not related to alcohol abuse, no abnormal CDT value was observed. We can conclude from these results that the CDT test now seems to be the best test to detect alcohol abusers.