Search

Copyright of Revista Alergia de Mexico is the property of Coleg. Mexicano de Inmunologia Clinica y Alergia A.C.; Soc. Lat. de Alergia, Asma e Inmunologia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista Alergia de Mexico is the property of Coleg. Mexicano de Inmunologia Clinica y Alergia A.C.; Soc. Lat. de Alergia, Asma e Inmunologia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Given the different nature and better outcomes of oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, a novel clinical stage classification for HPV-related OPC has been accepted for the 8th edition AJCC TNM (ICON-S model). However, it is still unclear the HPV-relatedness definition with best diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value. Material and methods: The aim of this study was to compare different staging system models proposed for HPV-related OPC patients: 7th edition AJCC TNM, RPA stage with non-anatomic factors (Princess Margaret), RPA with N categories for nasopharyngeal cancer (MD-Anderson) and AHR-new (ICON-S), according to different HPV-relatedness definitions: HPV-DNA detection plus an additional positive marker (p16INK4a or HPV-mRNA), p16INK4a positivity alone or the combination of HPV-DNA/p16INK4a positivity as diagnostic tests. Results: A total of 788 consecutive OPC cases diagnosed from 1991 to 2013 were considered eligible for the analysis. Of these samples, 66 (8.4%) were positive for HPV-DNA and (p16INK4a or HPV-mRNA), 83 (10.5%) were p16INK4a positive and 58 (7.4%) were double positive for HPV-DNA/p16INK4a. ICON-S model was the staging system, which performed better in our series when using at least two biomarkers to define HPV-causality. When the same analysis was performed considering only p16INK4a-positivity, RPA stage with non-anatomic factors (Princess Margaret) has the best classification based on AIC criteria. Conclusion: HPV-relatedness definition for classifying HPV-related OPC patient do impact on TNM classification and patients’ survival. Further studies assessing HPV-relatedness definitions are warranted to better classify HPV-related OPC patients in the era of de-escalation clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: 1) Compare the cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) responses and the ocular VEMP (oVEMP) responses in normal volunteers and patients suffering from vertigo. 2) Analyze the similarities between the evoked responses and the results obtained by videonystagmography (VNG). Method: A prospective study in 126 patients (60 men, 66 women) was conducted at Hospital del Mar Barcelona from January to November 2011. cVEMP responses using click stimuli at 5 Hz monoaural 110 dB nHL intensity with the subjects in a sitting position and head turned to contralateral shoulder were analyzed. oVEMP responses were recorded using surface electrodes below the inferior eyelid. VNG was done using caloric stimulation. Results: VNG was altered in 23%. The cVEMP response was altered in 29%. The oVEMP responses were classified either as altered or absent in 31%. The sensitivity was similar for both the oVEMP and the cVEMP. Conclusion: The little difference in sensitivity found between the cVEMP and the oVEMP can be explained due to the different neural pathways. The same can be said for the results in the VNG. These current tests may complete the information about the physiology and integrity of the vestibular neural pathways and are easy and quick methods of evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]