Search

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine predictors of very late stent thrombosis (VLST; >1 year after stenting), and to evaluate whether addition of these predictors to the dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) score would improve the ability to identify patients at high risk of VLST who might benefit from DAPT.Background: VLST is a severe complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Extended knowledge about the predictors of VLST is needed to prevent this life-threatening complication. Recent data showed a reduction in VLST after treatment with prolonged DAPT. The DAPT study developed a prediction score to identify patients after PCI who might benefit from prolonged DAPT duration.Methods: The Dutch stent thrombosis study is a multi-center case-control study. Consecutive patients with definite VLST were included between 2007 and 2014. Baseline characteristics from the index PCI were collected. Independent predictors of VLST were identified and added to the DAPT score to develop the VLST score.Results: In total, 155 VLST cases and 155 matched controls were included. Suboptimal result of stenting, right coronary artery as target vessel, and diffuse coronary artery ectasia were independent predictors of VLST, and added to the DAPT score. The power of the VLST score to identify patients who experienced VLST was increased (AUC, 95%CI; DAPT score: 0.64, 0.57-0.70; VLST score: 0.70, 0.63-0.76, P = 0.010).Conclusions: Addition of newly identified independent predictors of VLST resulted in a prediction model with a higher ability to identify patients at high risk of VLST who might benefit from prolonged DAPT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Purpose: Grade 3 ischemia (G3I: distortion of the terminal portion of the QRS complex) is a predictor of serious complications after acute myocardial infarction. However, less is known about which patients are more prone to present with G3I. Methods: Patients who were enrolled in the Ongoing Tirofiban In Myocardial infarction Evaluation trial 2 were included. These patients were divided in 2 groups based on the enrolment electrocardiogram: grade 2 ischemia (G2I) or G3I. Results: Between June 2004 and November 2007, 1308 patients with interpretable electrocardiograms were enrolled. Grade 3 ischemia was found in 426 (32.6%) patients. Patients with G3I were older, more often male, more often had diabetes, had a Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score of greater than 3, had 3 vessel disease, had an anterior infarction, more often presented in Killip class greater than 1, less often had a preprocedural TIMI 3 flow, and less often had a myocardial blush grade 3 post-PCI. One hour post-PCI, residual ST deviation was higher in patients with G3I compared with patients with G2I. Furthermore, G3I was associated with more major cardiac events (including death, myocardial infarction, urgent target vessel revascularization). After multivariate adjustment, G3I was an independent predictor of failure of ST-segment resolution 1 hour post-PCI (odds ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.9) and 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-8.7). Conclusion: Grade 3 ischemia was associated with high-risk patient criteria (older age, diabetes, TIMI risk score >3, Killip class >1, and anterior myocardial infarction) and represents a subgroup of high-risk patients who seems to be associated with poor myocardial reperfusion and worse outcome. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the incidence, predictors, and outcome of complete ST-segment resolution (STR) during transportation after pretreatment with dual or triple antiplatelet therapy in the Ongoing Tirofiban in Myocardial Infarction Evaluation (On-TIME) 2 trial. Methods: Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were randomized in the ambulance to pretreatment with high-dose tirofiban (HDT) or to a control pretreatment (placebo or no HDT) on top of 600-mg clopidogrel, 500-mg aspirin, and 5000-IU unfractionated heparin. Complete STR was defined as ≥70% STR on the electrocardiogram obtained before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as compared with the inclusion electrocardiogram. Results: Complete STR before PCI occurred in 16.8% (n = 188/1121) and more frequently in the HDT group (19.0% vs 14.6%, P = .05). Independent predictors for complete STR before PCI were younger age (odds ratio [OR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.96, P = .01 per 10 year increase), fast diagnosis (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.97-1.0, P = .004 per 15-minute increase time from symptom onset to diagnosis), longer pretreatment time (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03-1.16, P = .003 per 15-minute increase time start study medication to angiography), and randomization to HDT (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.0-1.9, P = .05). Complete STR before PCI was associated with very low 30-day (0.5% vs 2.8%, P = .07) and 1-year (1.1% vs 5.0%, P = .019) mortality. Conclusions: Dual or triple antiplatelet pretreatment in the ambulance results in complete STR before PCI in 17% of patients. Fast ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction diagnosis, prehospital initiation of pretreatment early after symptom onset, and HDT independently predicted STR before PCI. Complete STR is associated with improved clinical outcome. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

There are no randomised data on which antiplatelet agent to use in elderly patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) and an indication for oral anticoagulation (OAC). The randomised POPular Age trial, in patients of 70 years or older with NSTE-ACS, showed a reduction in bleeding without increasing thrombotic events in patients using clopidogrel as compared to ticagrelor. In this sub-analysis of the POPular AGE trial, we compare clopidogrel with ticagrelor in patients with a need for oral anticoagulation. The follow-up duration was one year. The primary bleeding outcome was Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) major and minor bleeding. The primary thrombotic outcome consisted of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke. The primary net clinical benefit outcome was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and PLATO major and minor bleeding. A total of 184/1011 (18.2%) patients on OAC were included in this subanalysis; 83 were randomized to clopidogrel and 101 to ticagrelor. The primary bleeding outcome was lower in the clopidogrel group (17/83, 20.9%) compared to the ticagrelor group (33/101, 33.5%; p = 0.051), as was the thrombotic outcome (7/83, 8.4% vs. 19/101, 19.2%; p = 0.035) and the primary net clinical benefit outcome (23/83, 27.7% vs. 49/101, 48.5%; p = 0.003). In this subgroup of patients using OAC, clopidogrel reduced PLATO major and minor bleeding compared to ticagrelor without increasing thrombotic risk. This analysis therefore suggests that, in line with the POPular Age trial, clopidogrel is a better option than ticagrelor in NSTE-ACS patients ≥70 years using OAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who are carrying CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles derive less benefit from clopidogrel treatment. Despite this, in elderly patients, clopidogrel might be preferred over more potent P2Y 12 inhibitors due to a lower bleeding risk. Whether CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet treatment in the elderly could be of benefit has not been studied specifically. Patients aged 70 years and older with known CYP2C19*2 and *3 genotype were identified from the POPular Genetics and POPular Age trials. Noncarriers of loss-of-function alleles treated with clopidogrel were compared to patients, irrespective of CYP2C19 genotype, treated with ticagrelor and to clopidogrel treated carriers of loss-of-function alleles. We assessed net clinical benefit (all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke and Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) major bleeding), atherothrombotic outcomes (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke) and bleeding outcomes (PLATO major and minor bleeding). A total of 991 patients were assessed. There was no significant difference in net clinical benefit (17.2% vs. 15.1%, adjusted hazard ratio (adjHR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77–1.44), atherothrombotic outcomes (9.7% vs. 9.2%, adjHR 1.00, 95%CI 0.66–1.50), and bleeding outcomes (17.7% vs. 19.8%, adjHR 0.80, 95%CI 0.62–1.12) between clopidogrel in noncarriers of loss-of-function alleles and ticagrelor respectively. In ACS patients aged 70 years and older, there was no significant difference in net clinical benefit and atherothrombotic outcomes between noncarriers of a loss-of-function allele treated with clopidogrel and patients treated with ticagrelor. The bleeding rate was numerically; though not statistically significant, lower in patients using clopidogrel. • This subgroup analysis included acute coronary syndrome patients aged 70 and older. • Clopidogrel in noncarriers of CYP2C19 LoF was compared to ticagrelor. • In this small subgroup, no differences in bleeding and ischemic outcomes were found. • Overall, results were comparable to the POPular Genetics main trial results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Current guidelines recommend potent platelet inhibition with ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients after an acute coronary syndrome. However, data about optimal platelet inhibition in older patients are scarce. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of clopidogrel compared with ticagrelor or prasugrel in older patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).Methods: We did the open-label, randomised controlled POPular AGE trial in 12 sites (ten hospitals and two university hospitals) in the Netherlands. Patients aged 70 years or older with NSTE-ACS were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio using an internet-based randomisation procedure with block sizes of six to receive a loading dose of clopidogrel 300 mg or 600 mg, or ticagrelor 180 mg or prasugrel 60 mg, and then a maintenance dose for the duration of 12 months (clopidogrel 75 mg once daily, ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily, or prasugrel 10 mg once daily) on top of standard care. Patient and treating physicians were aware of the allocated treatment strategy, but the outcome assessors were masked to treatment allocation. Primary bleeding outcome consisted of PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO; major or minor bleeding [superiority hypothesis]). Co-primary net clinical benefit outcome consisted of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, PLATO major and minor bleeding (non-inferiority hypothesis, margin of 2%). Follow-up duration was 12 months. Analyses were done on intention-to-treat basis. This trial is registered with the Netherlands Trial Register (NL3804), ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02317198), and EudraCT (2013-001403-37).Findings: Between June 10, 2013, and Oct 17, 2018, 1002 patients were randomly assigned to clopidogrel (n=500) or ticagrelor or prasugrel (n=502). Because 475 (95%) patients received ticagrelor in the ticagrelor or prasugrel group, we will refer to this group as the ticagrelor group. Premature discontinuation of the study drug occurred in 238 (47%) of 502 ticagrelor group patients randomly assigned to ticagrelor, and in 112 (22%) of 500 patients randomly assigned to clopidogrel. Primary bleeding outcome was significantly lower in the clopidogrel group (88 [18%] of 500 patients) than in the ticagrelor group (118 [24%] of 502; hazard ratio 0·71, 95% CI 0·54 to 0·94; p=0·02 for superiority). Co-primary net clinical benefit outcome was non-inferior for the use of clopidogrel (139 [28%]) versus ticagrelor (161 [32%]; absolute risk difference -4%, 95% CI -10·0 to 1·4; p=0·03 for non-inferiority). The most important reasons for discontinuation were occurrence of bleeding (n=38), dyspnoea (n=40), and the need for treatment with oral anticoagulation (n=35).Interpretation: In patients aged 70 years or older presenting with NSTE-ACS, clopidogrel is a favourable alternative to ticagrelor, because it leads to fewer bleeding events without an increase in the combined endpoint of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and bleeding. Clopidogrel could be an alternative P2Y12 inhibitor especially for elderly patients with a higher bleeding risk.Funding: ZonMw. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The purpose of this trial was to study the effect of a high bolus dose (HBD) of tirofiban on clinical outcome in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Background: The On-TIME 2 (Ongoing Tirofiban In Myocardial infarction Evaluation 2) placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial showed that early administration of HBD tirofiban in the ambulance improves ST-segment resolution in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The effect of early tirofiban treatment on clinical outcome is unclear. Methods: The On-TIME 2 trial consisted of 2 phases: an open-label phase, followed by a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase. STEMI patients were randomized to either HBD tirofiban or no tirofiban (phase 1) or placebo (phase 2) in addition to aspirin, heparin, and high-dose clopidogrel. The protocol pre-specified a pooled analysis of the 2 study phases to assess the incidence of major adverse cardiac events at the 30-day follow-up and on total mortality at the 1-year follow-up. Results: During a 3-year period, 1,398 patients were randomized, 414 in phase 1 and 984 in phase 2. Major adverse cardiac events at 30 days were significantly reduced (5.8% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.043). There was a strong trend toward a decrease in mortality (2.2% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.051) in patients who were randomized to tirofiban pre-treatment, which was maintained during the 1-year follow-up (3.7% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.08). No clinically relevant difference in bleeding was observed. Conclusions: Early, pre-hospital initiation of HBD tirofiban, in addition to high-dose clopidogrel, improves the clinical outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with STEMI. (Ongoing 2b/3a inhibition In Myocardial infarction Evaluation; ISRCTN06195297) [Copyright &y& Elsevier]