Search

Trauma-informed communities establish cross-sector coalitions that advocate for the use of trauma-informed practices. Whether and how communication occurs within newly established trauma-informed communities is unclear. We collected qualitative data and social network data from six trauma-informed community partnerships that received funding to build community capacity to address trauma across a range of special populations in Los Angeles county. We identified three communication network subtypes and highlight contributions of network leadership in setting the tone for cross-partnership communication. While partnership leaders shared the goal of strengthening cross-organizational communication, social network results illustrated a need to develop strategies that target these goals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aging population has led to an increase in emergency department (ED) visits by older adults who have complex medical conditions and high social needs. The purpose of this study was to assess if comprehensive geriatric evaluation and management impacted service utilization and cost by older adults admitted to the ED. Methods: This is a retrospective matched case–control study at a level 1 geriatric ED (GED) from January 1, 2018–March 31, 2020. Geriatric nurse specialists (GENIEs) provided comprehensive evaluations and management for GED patients. Propensity score matching was used to match patients receiving GENIE consultations to ED patients who did not receive a GENIE consult. Regression was used to assess the impact of the GENIE services on inpatient admissions, ED revisits and cost of inpatient and ED care from the payor perspective. Results: GENIE consults were associated with a 13.0% reduction in absolute risk of admission through the ED at index (95% confidence interval [CI] −17.0%, −9.0%, p < 0.001) and a reduction in risk for total admissions at 30 and 90‐days post discharge (−11.3%, 95% CI −15.6%, −7.1%, p‐value < 0.001; and −10.0, 95% CI −13.8%, −6.0%; p < 0.001 respectively), both driven by reduced risk of admission at the index visit. GENIE consults were associated with a 4% increase in absolute risk of revisits to the ED within 30 days (95% CI 0.6%, 7.3%; p = 0.001). GENIE consults were associated with a decrease in cost of inpatient and ED care, with savings of $2344 within 30 days (95% CI $2247, $2441, p < 0.001) and savings of $2004 USD within 90 days (95% CI $1895, $2114, p < 0.001), driven by reduced costs at the index visit. Conclusions: GENIE consults were associated with decreased inpatient admissions through the ED, modestly increased ED revisits, and decreased cost of inpatient and ED care. The results of this study can be useful for EDs considering approaches to better serve older adults. They can also be of interest to payers as an area of potential cost savings. See related Editorial by Southerland et al. in this issue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diabetes prevalence is predicted to rise dramatically during the next 20 years, and associated spending is expected to increase threefold. (1-3) Cultural barriers contribute to this burden by preventing optimal [...]

The objective of this study was to conduct a preliminary evaluation of a new young adult–centered metaintervention to improve treatment engagement among those with serious mental illness. Young adults, clinic staff, and policy makers provided feedback on the intervention, which is a two-module engagement program provided by a clinician and person with lived experience (peer) during intake. A two-group pilot randomized explanatory trial design was conducted, comparing treatment as usual with treatment as usual plus the engagement program, Just Do You. The primary outcomes were treatment engagement and presumed mediators of program effects measured at 3 months after baseline. The randomized explanatory trial indicated that young adults in Just Do You were more engaged in treatment than treatment as usual and that changes in several mediators of engagement occurred. Mechanisms that demonstrated between-group differences were stigma, perceived expertise of providers, trust in providers, and beliefs about the benefits of treatment. Results also provide diagnostic information on mediators that the program failed to change, such as hope, self-efficacy, and emotional reactions to treatment. These results inform next steps in the development of this promising intervention. Just Do You illustrated feasibility, acceptability and preliminary impact. It represents an innovative metaintervention that has promise for improving treatment engagement in mental health services among young adults who have a history of poor engagement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To examine whether roles of peer specialists affect service use among Black, Latinx and White youth ages 16‐24 with serious mental illness (SMI) in Los Angeles and San Diego Counties. Methods: Administrative data from 2015 to 2018 was used to summarize service use among 6329 transition age youth age 16‐24 with SMI who received services from 76 outpatient public mental health programs with peer specialists on staff. Roles of peer specialists were assessed via a program survey. Generalized linear models were used to assess the relationship between peer specialist characteristics and service use outcomes (ie, outpatient and inpatient). Results: Having a transition age youth peer specialist on staff (vs older peer specialists) and having peer specialists that provide four or more services (vs fewer services) was associated with an increase in annual outpatient visits in both counties (P = <.001 each). In Los Angeles County, having three or more peer specialist trainings (vs fewer trainings) was associated with lower use of inpatient services (P <.001). In San Diego County, having a transition age youth peer specialist and peer specialists that provide four or more services was associated with lower use of inpatient services (P <.001 each). Conclusions: Types of peer support and number of types of peer services were associated with mental health service utilization. Detailed examination of the roles of peer specialists is merited to identify the specific pathways that improve outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Practice coaches are skilled consultants who work in health care service delivery systems to make changes designed to improve patient outcomes, yet research is limited regarding their use to support integrated health care. This article describes the use of practice coaches in a large-scale effort to implement integrated care in the United States for patients with complex care needs. Theory and methods: This immersive, qualitative project involved five implementation team members; eight practice coaches; and 77 staff members from 12 health care organizations. Semistructured interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic and content analyses were applied in multiple stages to understand the use of practice coaches. Results: Qualitative themes about the use of practice coaching in this initiative were: (a) development of "a very rich coaching model"; (b) moving from an organic to standardized coaching approach; and (c) coaches representing the "face of the initiative." Discussion: A rich coaching model that includes an interdisciplinary coaching team can support integrated care transformation but challenges including finding highly qualified coaches and sustaining and disseminating the coaching model exist. Standardization was seen as a way to address such challenges. Conclusion: Practice coaches can provide individualized, hands-on guidance to support successful implementation of integrated care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate racial-ethnic differences in use of mental health services and antipsychotic medication in the year following the recent onset of a psychotic disorder and to examine the role of household income as a proxy for socioeconomic status.Methods: Deidentified administrative claims data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse were used to identify 8,021 commercially insured individuals ages 14 through 30 with a recent-onset psychotic disorder (January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2015). The authors compared mental health service use among African-American (11.5%), Hispanic (11.0%), and non-Hispanic white (77.4%) individuals during the year following an index diagnosis and adjusted these analyses for household income.Results: The probability of any use of outpatient mental health services was lower among African-American (67.4%±1.4%) and Hispanic individuals (66.5%±1.5%) compared with non-Hispanic white patients (72.3%±0.6%; p<0.05 for each comparison). Among those who used services, African-American and Hispanic individuals had fewer mean outpatient mental health visits per year compared with non-Hispanic whites (9.7±0.7 and 10.2±0.7 versus 14.3±0.5, respectively, p<0.001 for each comparison). These racial-ethnic differences in service use remained after adjustment for household income.Conclusions: Among young, commercially insured individuals using outpatient services following an index diagnosis of psychotic disorder, African Americans and Hispanics received less intensive outpatient mental health care than their non-Hispanic white counterparts. Amid the upsurge of early intervention programs, special attention should be paid to increasing access to mental health services for racial-ethnic minority groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To investigate patterns of mental health service and antipsychotic use following a first-episode schizophrenia (FES) and to examine the role of the treatment setting in which individuals are first diagnosed. Method Analysis of de-identified administrative claims data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse was used to identify 1450 privately insured youth and young adults aged 14 through 30 with FES from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015. Regression analysis was used to estimate the use of mental health services during the year following FES, by type of service and by site of index diagnosis. Results In the year following FES, 79.7% of youth received outpatient mental health services and 35.8% filled a prescription for antipsychotic medication. Among service users, mean outpatient visits were 15.9 and mean antipsychotic fills were 8.3. Youth who received an index diagnosis of FES in an inpatient setting were more likely to fill an antipsychotic medication than youth with FES in other settings. Youth who received an index diagnosis of FES during a specialty mental health outpatient visit had greater use of outpatient mental health than youth who received their diagnosis during a primary care visit. Conclusions Despite evidence-based guidelines supporting outpatient psychosocial care and antipsychotic treatment for FES, one-fifth of this cohort did not use outpatient services and the majority did not fill any prescriptions for antipsychotic medications during the year following FES. Our findings provide renewed urgency to ongoing efforts to accelerate early identification and care coordination for youth with FES. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The prevalence of diabetes has increased substantially in Mexico over the last 40 years, leading to significant impacts on population health and the healthcare system. Technology-based solutions may improve diabetes outcomes in areas where lack of efficient transportation creates barriers to care. To estimate the lifetime cost-effectiveness of a technology-based diabetes care management program from the perspective of the Mexican healthcare system. Clinical outcomes and cost data from a 3-arm randomized clinical trial of Dulce Wireless Tijuana, a diabetes care management program incorporating short-term mobile technology, were used as inputs in a validated simulation model for type 2 diabetes. Study arms included a control group (CG), Project Dulce diabetes care management (PD), and Project Dulce with technology enhancement (PD-TE). Intervention costs were $1448 for PD and $1740 for PD-TE compared with $740 for CG. Both intervention arms increased quality-adjusted life-years and costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for PD was $1635 and for PD-TE was $2220, both compared with CG. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for PD-TE versus PD was $4299. The results were sensitive to the time horizon. The PE and PD-TE interventions were cost-effective under time horizons of 15 to 20 years, but were not cost-effective under time horizons of 5 to 10 years. Both the PD and PD-TE were highly cost-effective from a Mexican health system perspective. Considering the economic impact of the diabetes epidemic and the widespread use of cellular technology in Mexico, implementation of PD-TE is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study examined sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and health resource utilization among Medicare beneficiaries with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to identify predictors of nebulized arformoterol treatment. Using Medicare administrative data from 2010 to 2014, beneficiaries with ≥2 COPD outpatient visits ≥30 d apart or ≥1 COPD-related hospitalization(s) (ICD-9-CM 491.xx, 492.xx, and 496) were identified. Inclusion criteria required ≥1 COPD medication claim(s) and continuous enrollment in Parts A, B, and D. Four cohorts were identified: (a) 11,887 arformoterol users, (b) a subsample of arformoterol users (n = 1,778) who were hospitalized and discharged 30 d before initiating arformoterol, (c) 450,178 controls who had not received arformoterol, and (d) a subsample of controls (n = 21,910) who had hospitalizations. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate predictors of arformoterol treatment. The majority of beneficiaries were older than 70 years of age, female, Caucasian, and 47% were dual-eligible. The strongest predictors of arformoterol treatment were oxygen therapy, systemic corticosteroid or methylxanthine use, an exacerbation, a COPD-related hospitalization, and receiving care from a pulmonologist (all p <.001). Dual-eligibility, being a racial/ethnic minority, and having severe psychiatric comorbidity or immunodeficiency lowered the odds of receiving nebulized arformoterol (all p <.001). Among beneficiaries with recent hospitalizations, exacerbations and COPD-related admissions increased the odds of receiving arformoterol (p <.001). Nebulized arformoterol treatment was more likely to be initiated in sicker patients with COPD. Ensuring access to nebulized maintenance therapy is important and particularly warranted for COPD populations with greater medical needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]