Search

Objective: The impact of adjunctive manual thrombus aspiration (TA) in patients with stent thrombosis (ST) treated with percutaneous intervention has not been evaluated in the current era of potent P2Y12 agents and new-generation drug-eluting stents. We sought to assess the effect of TA using data from a large contemporary registry. Methods: The study population was derived from the Essex ST Investigation Registry (ESTHIR), which contains all consecutive cases of angiographically determined definite ST undergoing interventional treatment in a tertiary cardiac centre between November 2015 and June 2018. Propensity score matching was performed to match patients who underwent TA (TA group) to those who did not (n-TA group). The study endpoints were final TIMI flow and survival free of cardiovascular death (CD) or target lesion revascularisation (TLR). Results: A total of 128 ST patients were included in the present analysis. The mean age was 65 ± 11 years, and 84% were male. About 90% of the patients presented with STEMI, and 85% had very late ST. Seventy-two patients (56%) underwent TA. After propensity score matching, 30 patients were included in each study group. A higher rate of final TIMI III flow was observed in the TA group (TA vs n-TA group, 100% vs 83%), but this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.052). At 1000 days of follow-up, survival free of CD or TLR was not different between the two groups (p = 0.8). Conclusion: In a propensity-matched population of ST patients undergoing PCI in a contemporary setting, TA was not associated with improved final TIMI flow or long-term cardiovascular outcomes.

Background: The assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) using invasive methods is a field of growing interest, however the preferred method remains debated. Bolus and continuous thermodilution are commonly used methods, but weak agreement has been observed in patients with angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA). This study examined their agreement in revascularized acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) patients. Objective: To compare bolus thermodilution and continuous thermodilution indices of CMD in revascularized ACS and CCS patients and assess their diagnostic agreement at pre-defined cut-off points. Methods: Patients from two centers underwent paired bolus and continuous thermodilution assessments after revascularization. CMD indices were compared between the two methods and their agreements at binary cut-off points were assessed. Results: Ninety-six patients and 116 vessels were included. The mean age was 64 ± 11 years, and 20 (21 %) were female. Overall, weak correlations were observed between the Index of Microcirculatory Resistance (IMR) and continuous thermodilution microvascular resistance (Rµ) (rho = 0.30p = 0.001). The median coronary flow reserve (CFR) from continuous thermodilution (CFRcont) and bolus thermodilution (CFRbolus) were 2.19 (1.76–2.67) and 2.55 (1.50–3.58), respectively (p

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion aims to reduce the risk of stroke in patients with AF, particularly those who are not good candidates for systemic anticoagulation. The procedure has been studied in large international randomised trials and registries and was approved by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in 2014 and by NHS England in 2018. This position statement summarises the evidence for left atrial appendage occlusion and presents the current indications. The options and consensus on best practice for pre-procedure planning, undertaking a safe and effective implant and appropriate post-procedure management and follow-up are described. Standards regarding procedure volume for implant centres and physicians, the role of multidisciplinary teams and audits are highlighted.

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion aims to reduce the risk of stroke in patients with AF, particularly those who are not good candidates for systemic anticoagulation. The procedure has been studied in large international randomised trials and registries and was approved by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in 2014 and by NHS England in 2018. This position statement summarises the evidence for left atrial appendage occlusion and presents the current indications. The options and consensus on best practice for pre-procedure planning, undertaking a safe and effective implant and appropriate post-procedure management and follow-up are described. Standards regarding procedure volume for implant centres and physicians, the role of multidisciplinary teams and audits are highlighted.