Search

The objective of this digestibility assessment was to determine whether there are significant differences in the digestibility of Roundup Ready (glyphosate-tolerant) and conventional sugar beet, fodder beet, and beet pulp produced from sugar beet varieties when fed to sheep (seven wethers per treatment group). Three experiments were conducted in this assessment. Experiment 1 (35 wethers) compared one glyphosate-tolerant fodder beet variety with four conventional varieties, Exp. 2 (42 wethers) compared one glyphosate-tolerant sugar beet variety with five conventional varieties, and Exp. 3 (42 wethers) compared beet pulp derived from glyphosate-tolerant sugar beet with beet pulp from five European locations. The experimental phase consisted of a 2-wk preliminary period followed by a 1-wk collection period for Exp. 1 and 2, and a 1-wk preliminary period followed by a 1-wk digestibility collection period for Exp. 3. Diets were comprised of grass hay at 30, 30, and 20% of DM for Exp. 1, 2, and 3, respectively, with the balance being beet components. Urea and sodium sulfate were supplemented (8 and 2.9 g, respectively, for Exp. 1 and 2; and 6 g and 2.16 g, respectively, for Exp. 3) to supply sufficient dietary N and S. Each diet was fed to sheep (96 +/- 0.9 kg) in the three experiments to at or near maintenance energy levels. Treatment differences were considered significant at P0.05. Apparent digestibilities of DM, OM, CP, NDF, ADF, and DE for glyphosate-tolerant fodder and sugar beets did not differ from those for commercial fodder and sugar beets in Exp. 1 and 2. There were differences (P0.05) in DM, OM, CP, NDF, ADF, and DE digestibilities influenced by the different varieties of beet pulp in Exp. 3, but these were not unique to just the Roundup Ready sugar beet variety. Digestibilities and feeding values of Roundup Ready fodder beet, sugar beet, and beet pulp produced from Roundup Ready sugar beet varieties were not influenced by the introduction of the Roundup Ready trait compared with conventional varieties.

Three experiments were conducted to compare the feeding value of genetically enhanced corn (Roundup Ready corn events GA21 and nk603) with nontransgenic hybrids. The four treatments included two separate reference hybrids (REF), the near-isogenic control hybrid (CON), and the genetically enhanced corn (RR), resulting in two preplanned comparisons of CON vs. RR and RR vs. the average of REF. In Exp. 1 (RR event GA21), 175 steers (BW = 427 kg) were fed in 25 pens with seven pens per corn hybrid, except CON, which contained four pens due to limited quantities of that hybrid. In Exp. 2 (RR event nk603), 196 steers (BW = 420 kg) were fed in 28 pens with seven pens per corn. In Exp. 3 (RR event nk603), 200 steers were fed in 20 pens, with a similar treatment design to Exp. 2 and five pens per corn. All experiments were conducted as completely randomized designs and utilized corn produced at University of Illinois (Exp. 1 and 2) and University of Nebraska (Exp. 3) research farms under identity-preserved protocols. In all experiments, DMI, ADG, and feed efficiency were similar (P0.30) between RR and REF. In Exp. 1 and Exp. 2, RR was not different (P0.25) than CON for growth performance. In Exp. 3, RR was not different from CON for ADG and DMI (P0.15) or for feed efficiency (P = 0.08). No differences were observed between RR and CON or RR and REF for carcass weight, longissimus dorsi area, and marbling scores in any of the experiments. Subtle differences were observed between RR and either CON or REF for fat depth in each experiment; however, cattle fed RR were not consistently greater and varied from either the CON or the REF (but not both contrasts) within an experiment. Based on these results, insertion of glyphosate-tolerant genes had no significant effect on nutritive quality of corn. Performance and carcass characteristics were not influenced, which suggests that Roundup Ready corn is similar to conventional, nontransgenic corn when fed to finishing feedlot cattle.

Methods for detecting and measuring the quantity of fibrolytic enzyme preparations added to feeds were investigated by enzymatic and tracer methods. Enzyme preparations added to corn silage, ryegrass silage, and a total mixed ration containing both silages and a concentrate could not be detected using their enzymatic activities. Glycosidase activities of solubles washed from the feed were more than an order of magnitude greater than glycosidases in the added enzymes. Carboxymethylcellulase and xylanase activity determinations, using reducing sugar release as the measurement, were subject to interference from reducing sugars present in the feed. A fluorescent tracer method, using fluorescein added at a rate of 1 g/L of feed enzymes, or 2 g/t of feed, was developed that enabled sensitive detection of liquid enzyme additions to feeds.

In Exp. 1, Angus (A, n = 30), Charolais (C, n = 37), and Simmental (S, n = 30) multiparous cows received (s.c.) recombinantly derived bovine somatotropin (bST; sometribove, 500 mg) or vehicle (VEH) at 2-wk intervals from 124 to 228 d postpartum (DPP). Calves were weaned at 228 DPP. Bovine somatotropin increased (P.01) milk yield and percentage of milk fat similarly in A, C, and S cows. Calf weaning weight was greater (P.05) in cows treated with bST than in those given VEH. Administration of bST decreased deposition of fat and increased concentrations of IGF-I, insulin, glucose, and nonesterified fatty acids. In Exp. 2, we compared effects of bST initiated before or after the breeding season. Charolais (n = 33) and S (n = 40) cows were administered (at 2-wk intervals) VEH or bST beginning at 28 DPP (B-bST) or bST beginning at 105 DPP (A-bST). Calves were weaned at 243 DPP. Administration of bST before or after the breeding season increased milk yield on DPP 136 and 194; however, yields were greater in A-bST than in B-bST cows. Milk yields were similar in all cows at 236 DPP, corresponding to decreased forage availability. Calf body weight was greater (P.05) in A-bST than VEH; B-bST calves were similar to VEH. Fat depth was greater in VEH than in bST-treated cows in C but not in S cows. Serum IGF-I was greater in A- and B-bST than in VEH cows. Mean days from calving to serum progesterone1 ng/mL and pregnancy rates were similar in VEH, A-, and B-bST cows. Administration of bST increased cow milk yield and subsequent calf weaning weight when initiated after 100 d postpartum. As anticipated, bST increased IGF-I, insulin, glucose, and nonesterified fatty acids. Administration of bST before and during the breeding season did not affect reproductive performance.