1. Impact of Changes in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction on Survival After Transapical Aortic Valve Implantation
- Author
-
Erica Manzan, Chiara Tessari, Gino Gerosa, Giuseppe Tarantini, Augusto D'Onofrio, Giulio Rizzoli, Roberto Bianco, Chiara Fraccaro, Massimo Napodano, Luigi P. Badano, Demetrio Pittarello, Eleonora Bizzotto, Laura Besola, D'Onofrio, A, Besola, L, Rizzoli, G, Bizzotto, E, Manzan, E, Tessari, C, Bianco, R, Tarantini, G, Badano, L, Napodano, M, Fraccaro, C, Pittarello, D, and Gerosa, G
- Subjects
Male ,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Aortic valve ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Transcatheter aortic ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Risk Assessment ,Ventricular Function, Left ,Follow-Up Studie ,Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ,Ventricular Dysfunction, Left ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Retrospective Studie ,Interquartile range ,Echocardiography, Stre ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,In patient ,cardiovascular diseases ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Aged, 80 and over ,Ejection fraction ,business.industry ,Stroke Volume ,Retrospective cohort study ,MED/11 - MALATTIE DELL'APPARATO CARDIOVASCOLARE ,Aortic Valve Stenosis ,Aortic Valve Stenosi ,humanities ,New York Heart Association Functional Classification ,Survival Rate ,Treatment Outcome ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Italy ,Heart Valve Prosthesis ,cardiovascular system ,Cardiology ,Female ,Surgery ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Human ,Echocardiography, Stress ,Follow-Up Studies ,circulatory and respiratory physiology - Abstract
Background This single-center retrospective study assessed the variation of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation and its effect on survival. We also evaluated the effect of sheath diameter on LVEF. Methods We analyzed data of all consecutive patients who underwent transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Sapien (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) device (and its evolutions) between 2009 and 2015. We analyzed the difference between preoperative LVEF and LVEF at discharge (ΔEF = LVEFpost-op – LVEFpre-op) and considered its interquartile range (±5%) as the cutoff. Patients were divided in three groups: (1) improved LVEF (ΔEF ≥ +5%); (2) unchanged LVEF (ΔEF –5% to +5%), and (3) worsened LVEF (ΔEF ≤ –5%). Survival was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis, and logistic regression multivariable analysis was used to determine independent predictors of LVEF improvement. Results Data of 122 patients were analyzed. Patients in the three groups were distributed as follows: (group 1) 27 patients (22.1%), (group 2) 69 (56.6%), and (group 3) 26 (21.3%). The mean ΔEF was 12.7% ± 4.7% in group 1 and –10.8% ± 3.9% in group 3. The ΔEF was more likely to improve in patients with preoperative LVEF of less than 0.35 ( p = 0.014). There were no significant differences in survival ( p = 0.41), rehospitalization ( p = 0.472), and New York Heart Association Functional Classification ( p = 0.307) among the groups. The use of the smallest available sheath (18F) was not associated with a significant change of ΔEF. Conclusions LVEF worsened in a small number of patients after transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation, but this change was not associated with worse postoperative outcomes. Patients with a low LVEF showed better improvement. The progressive reduction of sheath diameter does not have a significant effect on LVEF changes.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF