Search

Background: Little is known about the magnitude and patterns of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriage among intensive care unit (ICU) healthcare workers (HCWs), especially in lower-middle-income countries like Vietnam. Materials and methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted on HCWs working in the adult ICU of the Hospital for Tropical Diseases in Vietnam between October 28 and December 20, 2019. These HCWs included physicians, nurses, and nursing assistants who were responsible for all essential medical activities and basic patient care. A questionnaire was used to collect participants' information, including age, sex, profession, ICU working time, and underlying diseases. Hand and nasal swabs were collected weekly for 8 consecutive weeks for MRSA screening. Staphylococcal isolates were checked for catalase and coagulase and, for methicillin resistance using cefoxitin disk diffusion, then rechecked on the matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Results: Among 55 HCWs, 16 (29.1%) carried MRSA in their noses or hands. MRSA intermittent hand carriage was documented in 2 (3.6%) HCWs. Among 53 HCWs undertaking nasal swabs, 13 (24.5%) were MRSA persistent and 3 (5.6%) were intermittent carriers. The MRSA carriage rate was highest among nursing assistants (50%, 4/8). More HCWs with underlying diseases were found to be MRSA carriers (31.8%, 7/22) compared with those without comorbidities (27.3%, 9/33). Conclusion: MRSA carriage among HCWs is not rare. The findings highlight an urgent need to review and update the local infection prevention and control measures to prevent MRSA transmission from HCWs to patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim: Chronic hemodialysis patients are at high risk of contracting hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HCV) virus infections. In Vietnam, the seroprevalence of HBV and HCV infections is approximately 10 and 4%, respectively. Although the chronic hemodialysis population is increasing, relatively little epidemiology is available for HBV and HCV infections in this population. To address this, we reviewed the current literature on the magnitude of these infections in the hemodialysis population in Vietnam. Methods: Four databases were used to search for publications containing the prevalence of HBV and/or HCV infections in hemodialysis patients in Vietnam. Grey literature search was utilized to identify local publications. Prevalence and 95% confidence interval were used or calculated, and a meta‐analysis was conducted on HBV and HCV prevalence for comparison. Results: Sixteen studies were included in the review. The search identified knowledge gaps in the current literature. Available data show that HBV and HCV infections remain prevalent in the hemodialysis population. HBV prevalence is not different between the north and the south of Vietnam. The pattern of HCV prevalence is different, with recent reports of lower prevalence in the south than in the north, while HCV prevalence varies between hemodialysis units in the same regions. Conclusions: A national prevalence survey of hemodialysis patients would improve the reliability and generalizability of the findings. However, the review confirmed that both HBV and HCV were prevalent in hemodialysis patients. The findings support a reinforcement of infection prevention to minimize the risk of HBV and HCV transmission in hemodialysis facilities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]