Search

Self-regulated learning (SRL) and culturally responsive teaching (CRT) research, although from different viewpoints, both show instructional practices that enhance student engagement. This study examined the integration of self-regulated learning promoting practices (SRLPPs) and culturally responsive pedagogical practices (CRPPs) in the classroom context especially during a complex task. Using mixed-methods case study design, it explored how an elementary classroom teacher at a multicultural public school in the West Coast of Canada combined SRLPPs and CRPPs to support culturally diverse students’ engagement. Data were collected through:(a) classroom observations, (b) practice records and documents, (c) students’ work samples, (d) teacher interview, (e) student interviews, and (f) student surveys. Findings indicated that the teacher enacted integrated practices categorized as: (a) classroom foundational practices; (b) designed instructional practices; and (c) dynamic support practices. Also, students’ engagements related to their perceptions of teacher practices. Culturally diverse students were highly engaged in contexts with rich combinations of SRLPPs and CRPPs. Finally, this paper discussed the implications for theory (e.g., CRT, SRL), practice (e.g., an integrated pedagogy), and research (e.g., how to support culturally diverse learners’ engagement in contexts).

Student learning processes, including motivation and engagement, have been identified as malleable and situated in context. We have limited understanding about how to enhance motivation and engagement processes for culturally diverse learners in today’s multicultural classrooms. To support thinking about that challenge, this work built on research on both culturally responsive teaching (CRT) and self-regulated learning (SRL), each of which identifies pedagogical practices that enhance student engagement and motivation. This study examined how students at a culturally diverse independent elementary school in the West Coast of Canada participated in classroom context that integrated CRT and SRL-promoting practices. Specifically, this study examined culturally diverse learners’ engagement and motivation during a complex learning task. Data collected included classroom observations, practice records and documents, students’ work samples, and student interviews and student surveys. The results demonstrated: (1) above medium levels of engagement and motivation, among participants, that varied across specific contexts; and (2) associations between culturally diverse learners’ engagement and motivation; and complex learning context such as CRT and SRL-promoting practices. Implications for future research on culturally diverse students’ engagement as well as designing a complex task that integrated a culturally responsive teaching and self-regulated learning pedagogical practices to support engagement and motivation are discussed.

Research shows that culturally diverse students are often disengaged in multicultural classrooms. To address this challenge, literatures on self-regulated learning (SRL) and culturally responsive teaching (CRT) both document practices that foster engagement, although from different perspectives. This study examined how classroom teachers at schools that enrol students from diverse cultural communities on the West Coast of Canada built on a Culturally Responsive Self-Regulated Learning Framework to design complex tasks that integrated SRL pedagogical practices (SLPPs) and culturally-responsive pedagogical practices (CRPPs) to support student engagement. Two elementary school teachers and their 43 students (i.e., grades 4 and 5) participated in this study. We used a multiple, parallel case study design that embedded mixed methods approaches to examine how the teachers integrated SRLPPs and CRPPs into complex tasks; how culturally diverse students engaged in each teacher’s task; and how students’ experiences of engagement were related to their teachers' practices. We generated evidence through video-taped classroom observations, records of classroom practices, students’ work samples, a student self-report, and teacher interviews. Overall findings showed: (1) that teachers were able to build on the CR-SRL framework to guide their design of an CR-SRL complex task; (2) benefits to students’ engagement when those practices were present; and (3) dynamic learner-context interactions in that student engagement was situated in features of the complex task that were present on a given day. We close by highlighting implications of these findings, limitations, and future directions.