Search

Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy at electrocardiography (ECG) predicts incident atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the diagnostic performance of ECG for diagnosis of LV hypertrophy in patients with AF is still not well characterized.We analyzed 563 hypertensive patients enrolled in the Umbria-Atrial Fibrillation (Umbria-FA) registry, an ongoing prospective observational registry in patients with AF. All patients underwent ECG and standard echocardiography at their entry in the Register. Mean age was 74 years and 43% of patients were women. Prevalence of ECG-LV hypertrophy, defined by Perugia criterion corrected for body mass index, was 23%. Echocardiographic LV mass was the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of ECG-LV hypertrophy were 37.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 31.6–43.4), 90.0% (95% CI: 86.0–93.2) and 64.5% (95% CI: 60.4–68.3), respectively. Performance was comparable in patients with AF or sinus rhythm at ECG recording. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.622 (95% CI: 0.580–0.664) in the group with AF and 0.662 (95% CI: 0.605–0.720) in that with sinus rhythm (p ​= ​0.266 for comparison). These data suggest that standard ECG is reliable for diagnosis of LV hypertrophy in patients with a history of AF, regardless of the presence of AF or sinus rhythm at the time of ECG recording.

BackgroundThe different geometric patterns of the left ventricle may or may not coexist with chamber dilatation. The prognostic impact of such a combination is unclear. Methods and ResultsWe studied a cohort of 2635 initially untreated patients with hypertension, mean age 50 years. At entry, 24‐hour ambulatory blood pressure progressively increased across the patterns of normal geometry, concentric left ventricular (LV) remodeling, eccentric nondilated LV hypertrophy (LVH), eccentric dilated LVH, concentric nondilated LVH, and concentric dilated LVH. During a mean follow‐up of 9.7 years, 360 patients developed a first major cardiovascular event at a rate (×100 patient‐years) of 1.41. The event rate was 0.93 in the group with normal LV geometry, 1.10 in the group with LV concentric remodeling, 1.40 in the group with nondilated eccentric LVH, 2.10 in the group with eccentric dilated LVH, 2.34 in the group with nondilated concentric LVH, and 4.67 in the group with dilated concentric LVH (log‐rank test: P