1. Experimental study of base stabilization with fibrillated fiber.
- Author
-
Dar Hao Chen, Younho Rew, Tapase, Anand Bajarang, and Crockford, William
- Subjects
- *
SWELLING soils , *POLYPROPYLENE fibers , *FIBER cement , *SOIL cement , *FIBERS , *SOIL stabilization - Abstract
Potential benefits in applying polypropylene fiber to stabilize expansive soils and cement treated bases is already been reported in previous studies. So a critical need exists to incorporate the use of fiber into the Texas Department of Transportation's (TxDOT's) Guidelines for Modification and Stabilization of Soils and Base for Use in Pavement Structures. The present paper discusses the results collected from the first experiment al test section on FM897 in the TxDOT Paris District. Three 500-ft (152.4m) test sections were constructed with 2 percent cement on FM897 in February 2020 in the north bound lane loaded truck direction which includes a new sandstone base, full depth reclamation (FDR), and control. However, only the new sandstone base and FDR sections were built with fiber. In this project, two types of fibers were used--(a) fibrillated fiber Fibermesh300, and (b) macro-synthetic fiber Enduro 600.The surface and base layers from the new sandstone base section were removed and used for the edge widening area of the FDR and control sections. Based on the laboratory tests, the optimum fiber contents were found to be 0.6 percent and 0.4 percent for a new sandstone base and FDR, respectively. The laboratory Unconfine Compression Strength (UCS) results showed significant improvements (>112.36 percent) when fibers were added to the sandstone base. To have better control, fiber and cement were manually distributed, following the US Army Corps of Engineers' recommendations. Because of unexpected construction equipment failure that caused compaction delays of approximately 5 hours, cement was in contact with moisture for approximately 5 hours before compaction. UCS results showed an approximate 55 percent reduction when there was a 5-hour delay from the time water was introduced (resulting in the start of the hydration process) until the time of compaction. It indicated that there are detrimental effects on UCS i f there is delay on compaction. There were significant reductions on the normalized W1 deflections at 5 months after construction. In particular, the FDR and new sandstone base sections (with fiber) experienced over 52 percent reduction as compared to 1 week after construction FWD data. Furthermore, the averaged W1 deflections were lower than before construction for both FDR and new sandstone base sections (with fiber). This indicates that there were rapid increases in structural capacity and significant strength developed in the fiber sections between 1 week and 5 months. Further research is needed to explain the mechanism and phenomena. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF