Search

Context: Guidelines recommend that exercise training be considered for medically stable outpatients with heart failure. Previous studies have not had adequate statistical power to measure the effects of exercise training on clinical outcomes.Objective: To test the efficacy and safety of exercise training among patients with heart failure.Design, Setting, and Patients: Multicenter, randomized controlled trial of 2331 medically stable outpatients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. Participants in Heart Failure: A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise Training (HF-ACTION) were randomized from April 2003 through February 2007 at 82 centers within the United States, Canada, and France; median follow-up was 30 months.Interventions: Usual care plus aerobic exercise training, consisting of 36 supervised sessions followed by home-based training, or usual care alone.Main Outcome Measures: Composite primary end point of all-cause mortality or hospitalization and prespecified secondary end points of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization, and cardiovascular mortality or heart failure hospitalization.Results: The median age was 59 years, 28% were women, and 37% had New York Heart Association class III or IV symptoms. Heart failure etiology was ischemic in 51%, and median left ventricular ejection fraction was 25%. Exercise adherence decreased from a median of 95 minutes per week during months 4 through 6 of follow-up to 74 minutes per week during months 10 through 12. A total of 759 patients (65%) in the exercise training group died or were hospitalized compared with 796 patients (68%) in the usual care group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.84-1.02]; P = .13). There were nonsignificant reductions in the exercise training group for mortality (189 patients [16%] in the exercise training group vs 198 patients [17%] in the usual care group; HR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.79-1.17]; P = .70), cardiovascular mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization (632 [55%] in the exercise training group vs 677 [58%] in the usual care group; HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.83-1.03]; P = .14), and cardiovascular mortality or heart failure hospitalization (344 [30%] in the exercise training group vs 393 [34%] in the usual care group; HR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.75-1.00]; P = .06). In prespecified supplementary analyses adjusting for highly prognostic baseline characteristics, the HRs were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.81-0.99; P = .03) for all-cause mortality or hospitalization, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.82-1.01; P = .09) for cardiovascular mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization, and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.74-0.99; P = .03) for cardiovascular mortality or heart failure hospitalization. Other adverse events were similar between the groups.Conclusions: In the protocol-specified primary analysis, exercise training resulted in nonsignificant reductions in the primary end point of all-cause mortality or hospitalization and in key secondary clinical end points. After adjustment for highly prognostic predictors of the primary end point, exercise training was associated with modest significant reductions for both all-cause mortality or hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality or heart failure hospitalization.Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00047437. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To assess contributions of individual lifestyle changes on systolic blood pressure (SBP) changes. Methods: We examined associations between lifestyle behavior changes and SBP after 6 and 18 months in 782 PREMIER trial participants. Results: In multivariate models omitting weight, predicted SBP reductions ranged from ½ to 1½ mm Hg for reduced urinary sodium, improved fitness, and adherence to the DASH diet (except sodium at 18 months). With weight included, only fitness change additionally predicted SBP at 18 months. Conclusions: Several lifestyle behavior changes are important for BP lowering, but are difficult to detect when weight is included in multivariate models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Previous observational studies conducted predominantly in white men before 1988 estimated that 20% to 40% of myocardial infarctions (MIs) are unrecognized. Recent data on the proportion of MIs that are unrecognized, especially in women and African-Americans, are largely unavailable. Participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study were men and women, aged 45 to 65 years, who were free of clinically recognized coronary heart disease and electrocardiographic evidence of MI at baseline (n = 12,843). Three follow-up clinic examinations were conducted approximately 3, 6, and 9 years after baseline, and included a 12-lead electrocardiogram at rest. Electrocardiographic evidence of infarction was defined as the appearance between the baseline and subsequent examinations of a major Q wave or a minor Q wave with ischemic ST-T changes. Clinically recognized (hospitalized) MI events were also identified and validated. Incident unrecognized MI was defined as electrocardiographic evidence of MI before, or in the absence of, a clinically recognized MI during the follow-up period. Of 508 MIs, 20% were unrecognized (95% confidence interval 16% to 23%), with African-Americans having a slightly higher percentage (23%) than whites (19%). The percentage of unrecognized MIs in men and women was similar. The percentage of unrecognized MIs in the ARIC sample between 1987 and 1998 was slightly lower than previous estimates from other populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]