Search

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are suggested to play a discriminative role between some stages of thymocyte differentiation. However, differential aspects of the stage of mature single-positive thymocytes remain to be explored. The purpose of this study is to investigate the differential expression pattern of circRNAs in three different development stages of human thymocytes, including mature single-positive cells, and perform predictions in silico regarding the ability of specific circRNAs when controlling the expression of genes involved in thymocyte differentiation. We isolate human thymocytes at three different stages of intrathymic differentiation and determine the expression of circRNAs and mRNA by RNASeq. We show that the differential expression pattern of 50 specific circRNAs serves to discriminate between the three human thymocyte populations. Interestingly, the downregulation of RAG2, a gene involved in T-cell differentiation in the thymus, could be simultaneously controlled by the downregulation of two circRNASs (hsa_circ_0031584 and hsa_circ_0019079) through the hypothetical liberation of hsa-miR-609. Our study provides, for the first time, significant insights into the usefulness of circRNAs in discriminating between different stages of thymocyte differentiation and provides new potential circRNA–miRNA–mRNA networks capable of controlling the expression of genes involved in T-cell differentiation in the thymus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The NOTCH1 gene encodes a transmembrane receptor protein with activating mutations observed in many T‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias (T‐ALLs) and lymphomas, as well as in other tumor types, which has led to interest in inhibiting NOTCH1 signaling as a therapeutic target in cancer. Several classes of Notch inhibitors have been developed, including monoclonal antibodies against NOTCH receptors or ligands, decoys, blocking peptides, and γ‐secretase inhibitors (GSIs). GSIs block a critical proteolytic step in NOTCH activation and are the most widely studied. Current treatments with GSIs have not successfully passed clinical trials because of side effects that limit the maximum tolerable dose. Multiple γ‐secretase–cleavage substrates may be involved in carcinogenesis, indicating that there may be other targets for GSIs. Resistance mechanisms may include PTEN inactivation, mutations involving FBXW7, or constitutive MYC expression conferring independence from NOTCH1 inactivation. Recent studies have suggested that selective targeting γ‐secretase may offer an improved efficacy and toxicity profile over the effects caused by broad‐spectrum GSIs. Understanding the mechanism of GSI‐induced cell death and the ability to accurately identify patients based on the activity of the pathway will improve the response to GSI and support further investigation of such compounds for the rational design of anti‐NOTCH1 therapies for the treatment of T‐ALL. Implications for Practice: γ‐secretase has been proposed as a therapeutic target in numerous human conditions, including cancer. A better understanding of the structure and function of the γ‐secretase inhibitor (GSI) would help to develop safe and effective γ‐secretase–based therapies. The ability to accurately identify patients based on the activity of the pathway could improve the response to GSI therapy for the treatment of cancer. Toward these ends, this study focused on γ‐secretase inhibitors as a potential therapeutic target for the design of anti‐NOTCH1 therapies for the treatment of T‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias and lymphomas. Understanding the mechanism of γ‐secretase inhibitor (GSI)–induced cell death and the ability to accurately identify patients based on the activity of the pathway could improve the response to GSI therapy for the treatment of cancer. This article focuses on γ‐secretase inhibitors as a potential therapeutic target to treat T‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias and lymphomas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]