1. Practical and clinical utility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the acute treatment of migraine: a post hoc analysis of the randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind PRESTO trial
- Author
-
Licia GrazziEmail author, Cristina, Tassorelli, Marina de Tommaso, Giulia, Pierangeli, Paolo, Martelletti, Rainero, Innocenzo, Pierangelo, Geppetti, Anna, Ambrosini, Paola, Sarchielli, Eric, Liebler, Tassorelli C, Piero Barbanti PRESTO Study Group., Bitetto, V, De Icco, R, Martinelli, D, Sances, G, Bianchi, M, Grazzi, L, Padovan, Am, de Tommaso, M, Ricci, K, Vecchio, E, Cortelli, P, Cevoli, S, Pierangeli, G, Terlizzi, R, Martelletti, P, Negro, A, Chiariello, Ga, Rainero, I, De Martino, P, Gai, A, Govone, F, Masuzzo, F, Rubino, E, Torrieri, Mc, Vacca, A, Geppetti, P, Chiarugi, A, De Cesaris, F, Puma, Sl, Lupi, C, Marone, I, Ambrosini, A, Perrotta, A, Sarchielli, P, Bernetti, L, Corbelli, I, Romoli, M, Simoni, S, Verzina, A, Barbanti, P, Aurilia, C, Egeo, G, Fofi, L, Liebler, E, Andersson, A, Spitzer, L, Marin, J, Mcclure, C, Thackeray, L, Baldi, Mg, Di Maro, D., Grazzi, Licia, Tassorelli, Cristina, De Tommaso, Marina, Pierangeli, Giulia, Martelletti, Paolo, Rainero, Innocenzo, Geppetti, Pierangelo, Ambrosini, Anna, Sarchielli, Paola, Liebler, Eric, Barbanti, Piero, PRESTO Study Group, and Cortelli, Pietro
- Subjects
Male ,Neurology ,medicine.medical_treatment ,lcsh:Medicine ,0302 clinical medicine ,Migraine Disorder ,Prospective Studies ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Rescue medication ,neurology (clinical) ,Neuromodulation ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,Treatment Outcome ,Anesthesia ,Acute Disease ,Female ,Vagus nerve stimulation ,Research Article ,Human ,Adult ,Migraine ,Pain intensity ,Post hoc analysis ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Migraine Disorders ,anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ,Double blind ,03 medical and health sciences ,Double-Blind Method ,Post-hoc analysis ,medicine ,Humans ,Post hoc analysi ,business.industry ,migraine ,neuromodulation ,pain intensity ,post hoc analysis ,rescue medication ,vagus nerve stimulation ,Non invasive ,lcsh:R ,Correction ,Self Care ,Vagus Nerve Stimulation ,Neurology (clinical) ,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ,medicine.disease ,Prospective Studie ,Self care ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Background The PRESTO study of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS; gammaCore®) featured key primary and secondary end points recommended by the International Headache Society to provide Class I evidence that for patients with an episodic migraine, nVNS significantly increases the probability of having mild pain or being pain-free 2 h post stimulation. Here, we examined additional data from PRESTO to provide further insights into the practical utility of nVNS by evaluating its ability to consistently deliver clinically meaningful improvements in pain intensity while reducing the need for rescue medication. Methods Patients recorded pain intensity for treated migraine attacks on a 4-point scale. Data were examined to compare nVNS and sham with regard to the percentage of patients who benefited by at least 1 point in pain intensity. We also assessed the percentage of attacks that required rescue medication and pain-free rates stratified by pain intensity at treatment initiation. Results A significantly higher percentage of patients who used acute nVNS treatment (n = 120) vs sham (n = 123) reported a ≥ 1-point decrease in pain intensity at 30 min (nVNS, 32.2%; sham, 18.5%; P = 0.020), 60 min (nVNS, 38.8%; sham, 24.0%; P = 0.017), and 120 min (nVNS, 46.8%; sham, 26.2%; P = 0.002) after the first attack. Similar significant results were seen when assessing the benefit in all attacks. The proportion of patients who did not require rescue medication was significantly higher with nVNS than with sham for the first attack (nVNS, 59.3%; sham, 41.9%; P = 0.013) and all attacks (nVNS, 52.3%; sham, 37.3%; P = 0.008). When initial pain intensity was mild, the percentage of patients with no pain after treatment was significantly higher with nVNS than with sham at 60 min (all attacks: nVNS, 37.0%; sham, 21.2%; P = 0.025) and 120 min (first attack: nVNS, 50.0%; sham, 25.0%; P = 0.018; all attacks: nVNS, 46.7%; sham, 30.1%; P = 0.037). Conclusions This post hoc analysis demonstrated that acute nVNS treatment quickly and consistently reduced pain intensity while decreasing rescue medication use. These clinical benefits provide guidance in the optimal use of nVNS in everyday practice, which can potentially reduce use of acute pharmacologic medications and their associated adverse events. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02686034.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF