Search

Although traditional opioids such as morphine and oxycodone are commonly used in the management of acute postoperative pain, novel opioids may play a role as alternatives that provide potent pain relief while minimizing adverse effects. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of action, findings from preclinical studies and clinical trials, and potential advantages of several novel opioids. The more established include oliceridine (biased ligand activity to activate analgesia and downregulate opioid-related adverse events), tapentadol (mu-opioid agonist and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor), and cebranopadol (mu-opioid agonist with nociceptin opioid peptide activity)—all of which have demonstrated success in the clinical setting when compared to traditional opioids. On the other hand, dinalbuphine sebacate (DNS; semi-synthetic mu partial antagonist and kappa agonist), dual enkephalinase inhibitors (STR-324, PL37, and PL265), and endomorphin-1 analog (CYT-1010) have shown good efficacy in preclinical studies with future plans for clinical trials. Rather than relying solely on mu-opioid receptor agonism to relieve pain and risk opioid-related adverse events (ORAEs), novel opioids make use of alternative mechanisms of action to treat pain while maintaining a safer side-effect profile, such as lower incidence of nausea, vomiting, sedation, and respiratory depression as well as reduced abuse potential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Neuropathic pain is drug-resistant to available analgesics and therefore novel treatment options for this debilitating clinical condition are urgently needed. Recently, two drug candidates, namely mirogabalin and cebranopadol have become a subject of interest because of their potential utility as analgesics for chronic pain treatment. However, they have not been investigated thoroughly in some types of neuropathic pain, both in humans and experimental animals. Methods: This study used the von Frey test, the hot plate test and the two-plate thermal place preference test supported by image analysis and machine learning to assess the effect of intraperitoneal mirogabalin and subcutaneous cebranopadol on mechanical and thermal nociceptive threshold in mouse models of neuropathic pain induced by streptozotocin, paclitaxel and oxaliplatin. Results: Mirogabalin and cebranopadol effectively attenuated tactile allodynia in models of neuropathic pain induced by streptozotocin and paclitaxel. Cebranopadol was more effective than mirogabalin in this respect. Both drugs also elevated the heat nociceptive threshold in mice. In the oxaliplatin model, cebranopadol and mirogabalin reduced cold-exacerbated pain. Conclusions: Since mirogabalin and cebranopadol are effective in animal models of neuropathic pain, they seem to be promising novel therapies for various types of neuropathic pain in patients, in particular those who are resistant to available analgesics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cocaine use disorder is a psychiatric condition affecting millions of people worldwide. Up till now, there are no FDA approved medications reported against this disorder. Previous pharmacological studies suggested that, simultaneously targeting all types of opioid receptors, some agonistically while others antagonistically have been proven a much useful strategy for the treatment of cocaine addiction. Recent evidence indicated that a novel agonist cebranopadol has a high binding affinity towards Nociceptin opioid receptor (NOP) and Mu opioid receptor (MOP), and partial affinity with Kappa opioid receptor (KOP) and Delta opioid receptor (DOP). Interestingly, in vivo studies revealed that cebranopadol blocked the cocaine seeking in animal models. In the present study, quantum chemical calculations were performed to calculate various thermodynamic parameters of cebranopadol using density functional theory. Flexible docking was performed to rationalize the molecular basis of cis and trans isomers of cebranopadol. Further, the atomistic description of activation mechanism of MOP receptor by cebranopadol investigated by sub‐microsecond timescale molecular dynamic (MD) simulation. Our results revealed that the operating mode of the activation switch composed of Trp2936.48 and Asn3287.45 residues, was accountable for down‐ and up‐regulation, respectively, of the β‐arrestin signaling. This particular conformational change in turn affected the G‐protein‐biased activation of MOP receptor. Cebranopadol stabilized the Asn3287.45 by mediating halogen bond formation. According to best of our knowledge, this is the first mechanistic study of cebranopadol with MOP receptor using the quantum mechanical calculations and MD simulations to explain the inhibition of cocaine addiction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: Regardless of the etiology, if pain persists chronically, it can detrimentally impact multiple aspects of a patient's well-being. Both physical and psychological effects are significant in many chronic pain patients. In this regard, psychological consequences can alter a patient's quality of life, functionality, and social functioning. Opioids have been the long-established gold standard for acute pain treatment in settings such as the postoperative period. An alternative to opioids in pain management has been highly sought after. Through a non-selective mechanism, cebranopadol is a first-in-class oral drug which combines agonism of the mu and nociceptin opioid peptide (NOP) receptors to provide improved analgesia, while reducing the occurrence of many typically opioid side effects. This manuscript is a narrative review of the possible use of cebranopadol in pain management. Recent Findings: In pre-clinical studies, cebranopadol was similar to morphine in its pain control efficacy. In a phase IIa trial, cebranopadol was superior to placebo in reducing pain. In a randomized clinical trial, cebranopadol was superior to morphine. Another study concluded that cebranopadol had a lower misuse potential when compared to hydromorphone. Summary: In summary, cebranopadol offers new opportunities in treating chronic moderate to severe pain, while also countering risks of addiction. Additional studies are warranted to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of cebranopadol. In this regard, cebranopadol could prove to be a promising alternative to current pain treatment options. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although traditional opioids such as morphine and oxycodone are commonly used in the management of acute postoperative pain, novel opioids may play a role as alternatives that provide potent pain relief while minimizing adverse effects. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of action, findings from preclinical studies and clinical trials, and potential advantages of several novel opioids. The more established include oliceridine (biased ligand activity to activate analgesia and downregulate opioid-related adverse events), tapentadol (mu-opioid agonist and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor), and cebranopadol (mu-opioid agonist with nociceptin opioid peptide activity)—all of which have demonstrated success in the clinical setting when compared to traditional opioids. On the other hand, dinalbuphine sebacate (DNS; semi-synthetic mu partial antagonist and kappa agonist), dual enkephalinase inhibitors (STR-324, PL37, and PL265), and endomorphin-1 analog (CYT-1010) have shown good efficacy in preclinical studies with future plans for clinical trials. Rather than relying solely on mu-opioid receptor agonism to relieve pain and risk opioid-related adverse events (ORAEs), novel opioids make use of alternative mechanisms of action to treat pain while maintaining a safer side-effect profile, such as lower incidence of nausea, vomiting, sedation, and respiratory depression as well as reduced abuse potential.

Background: Neuropathic pain is drug-resistant to available analgesics and therefore novel treatment options for this debilitating clinical condition are urgently needed. Recently, two drug candidates, namely mirogabalin and cebranopadol have become a subject of interest because of their potential utility as analgesics for chronic pain treatment. However, they have not been investigated thoroughly in some types of neuropathic pain, both in humans and experimental animals. Methods: This study used the von Frey test, the hot plate test and the two-plate thermal place preference test supported by image analysis and machine learning to assess the effect of intraperitoneal mirogabalin and subcutaneous cebranopadol on mechanical and thermal nociceptive threshold in mouse models of neuropathic pain induced by streptozotocin, paclitaxel and oxaliplatin. Results: Mirogabalin and cebranopadol effectively attenuated tactile allodynia in models of neuropathic pain induced by streptozotocin and paclitaxel. Cebranopadol was more effective than mirogabalin in this respect. Both drugs also elevated the heat nociceptive threshold in mice. In the oxaliplatin model, cebranopadol and mirogabalin reduced cold-exacerbated pain. Conclusions: Since mirogabalin and cebranopadol are effective in animal models of neuropathic pain, they seem to be promising novel therapies for various types of neuropathic pain in patients, in particular those who are resistant to available analgesics.

Opioids are used to treat pain, but despite their effectiveness, they possess several side effects such as respiratory depression, tolerance and physical dependence. Cebranopadol has been evaluated as a solution to this problem. The compound acts on the mu opioid receptor and the nociceptin/orphanin receptor and these receptors co-activation can reduce opioid side-effects without compromising analgesia. In the present review, we have compiled information on the effects of cebranopadol, its pharmacokinetics, and clinical trials involving cebranopadol, to further explore its promise in pain management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cebranopadol is a novel, centrally acting, potent, first‐in‐class analgesic drug candidate with a unique mode of action that combines nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide receptor and opioid peptide receptor agonism. The present study aimed to develop and validate a novel UHPLC‐MS/MS method to quantify cebranopadol in rabbit plasma and to assess its pharmacokinetics in rabbits after subcutaneous (s.c.) administration. Twelve adult females were administered with 200 µg/kg s.c. injection. Blood samples were withdrawn at 15, 30 and 45 min and 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 24 hr after administration. The plasma samples were extracted with a liquid/liquid extraction. The new analytical method complied with the EMA requirements for the bioanalytical method validation. The method was selective, repeatable, accurate, precise and robust with a lower limit of quantification of 0.1 ng/ml. In all the rabbits, cebranopadol was quantifiable from 0.25 to 10 hr. Mean Cmax and Tmax were 871 ng/ml and 0.25 hr, respectively. Further studies including the i.v. administration are necessary to fully evaluate the pharmacokinetic features of this novel active compound. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Opioids are used to treat pain, but despite their effectiveness, they possess several side effects such as respiratory depression, tolerance and physical dependence. Cebranopadol has been evaluated as a solution to this problem. The compound acts on the mu opioid receptor and the nociceptin/orphanin receptor and these receptors co-activation can reduce opioid side-effects without compromising analgesia. In the present review, we have compiled information on the effects of cebranopadol, its pharmacokinetics, and clinical trials involving cebranopadol, to further explore its promise in pain management.

Context: Pain is one of the most prevalent symptoms associated with cancer. Strong opioids are commonly used in the analgesic management of the disease, but carry the risk of severe side effects. Cebranopadol is a first-in-class drug candidate, combining nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide and opioid peptide receptor agonism. For cancer patients, frequently experiencing multimorbidities and often exposed to polypharmacy, cebranopadol is easy to handle given its once-daily dosing, the small tablet size that enables swallowing, and the option to flexibly titrate to an effective dose.Objectives: We assessed the safety and tolerability of prolonged treatment with oral cebranopadol for up to 26 weeks in patients suffering from chronic moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain.Methods: This was a non-randomized, multi-site, open-label, single-arm clinical trial with patients who had completed a double-blind trial comparing morphine prolonged release with cebranopadol. In this extension trial, patients were treated with oral cebranopadol for up to 26 weeks.Results: Cebranopadol was safe and well tolerated in patients with chronic moderate-to-severe pain related to cancer in the dose range tested (200-1000 μg once daily). The median and mean pain levels remained in the range of mild pain during the treatment period.Conclusion: Our data suggest that cebranopadol was safe and well tolerated when administered for up to 26 weeks in patients with chronic cancer-related pain who were previously treated with cebranopadol or morphine prolonged release. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights • Cebranopadol is an innovative analgesic acting as mixed NOP/opioid receptor agonist. • Cebranopadol evoked a stronger withdrawal syndrome in NOP(-/-) than NOP(+/+) mice. • NOP signaling counteracts opioid-like physical dependency. Abstract Cebranopadol is a mixed NOP/opioid receptor agonist currently under development as innovative analgesic. In this study the liability of cebranopadol to produce opioid-type physical dependence has been evaluated in comparison with morphine in wild type mice and in mice knockout for the NOP receptor gene (NOP(-/-)). Mice were treated twice a day for 5 days with increasing doses of cebranopadol or morphine (cumulative doses 10.2 and 255 mg/kg, respectively) and the number of jumping in response to naloxone 10 mg/kg were measured after 2 h from the last injection. In wild type mice naloxone evoked a similar withdrawal jumping behavior in animal pretreated with morphine or cebranopadol. In NOP(-/-) mice morphine treatment produced the same signs of withdrawal as in NOP(+/+) animals, while cebranopadol treatment elicited a stronger withdrawal syndrome in NOP(-/-) than of NOP(+/+) mice. These results demonstrated that the activation of the NOP receptor reduces the liability of cebranopadol to produce opioid-like physical dependence. Thus, the simultaneous activation of NOP and opioid receptors can be an effective pharmacological strategy to counteract physical dependence to opioid drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cebranopadol (trans-6'-fluoro-4',9'-dihydro-N,N-dimethyl-4-phenyl-spiro[cyclohexane-1,1'(3'H)-pyrano[3,4-b]indol]-4-amine) is a novel analgesic nociceptin/orphanin FQ opioid peptide (NOP) and classical opioid receptor (MOP, DOP, and KOP) agonist with highly efficacious and potent activity in a broad range of rodent models of nociceptive, inflammatory, and neuropathic pain as well as limited opioid-type side effects such as respiratory depression. This study was designed to explore contribution and interaction of NOP and classical opioid receptor agonist components to cebranopadol analgesia in the rat spinal nerve ligation (SNL) model. Assessing antihypersensitive activity in SNL rats intraperitoneal (IP) administration of cebranopadol resulted in ED50 values of 3.3 and 3.58 μg/kg in two independent experiments. Pretreatment (IP) with J-113397 (4.64 mg/kg) a selective antagonist for the NOP receptor or naloxone (1 mg/kg), naltrindole (10 mg/kg), or nor-BNI (10 mg/kg), selective antagonists for MOP, DOP, and KOP receptors, yielded ED50 values of 14.1, 16.9, 17.3, and 15 μg/kg, respectively. This 4-5 fold rightward shift of the dose-response curves suggested agonistic contribution of all four receptors to the analgesic activity of cebranopadol. Combined pretreatment with a mixture of the antagonists for the three classical opioid receptors resulted in an 18-fold potency shift with an ED50 of 65.5 μg/kg. The concept of dose equivalence was used to calculate the expected additive effects of the parent compound for NOP and opioid receptor contribution and to compare them with the observed effects, respectively. This analysis revealed a statistically significant difference between the expected additive and the observed effects suggesting intrinsic synergistic analgesic interaction of the NOP and the classical opioid receptor components of cebranopadol. Together with the observation of limited respiratory depression in rats and humans the synergistic interaction of NOP and classical opioid receptor components in analgesia described in the current study may contribute to the favorable therapeutic index of cebranopadol observed in clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Opioids are characterised as classical (mu, delta, and kappa) along with the non-classical nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) receptor or NOP. Targeting NOP has therapeutic indications in control of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems and micturition, and a profile as an antidepressant. For all of these indications, there are translational human data. Opioids such as morphine and fentanyl (activating the mu receptor) are the mainstay of pain treatment in the perioperative period, despite a challenging side-effect profile. Opioids in general have poor efficacy in neuropathic pain. Moreover, longer term use is associated with tolerance. There is good evidence interactions between opioid receptors, and receptor co-activation can reduce side-effects without compromising analgesia; this is particularly true for mu and NOP co-activation. Recent pharmaceutical development has produced a mixed opioid/NOP agonist, cebranopadol. This new chemical entity is effective in animal models of nociceptive and neuropathic pain with greater efficacy in the latter. In animal models, there is little evidence for respiratory depression, and tolerance (compared with morphine) only develops after long treatment periods. There is now early phase clinical development in diabetic neuropathy, cancer pain, and low back pain where cebranopadol displays significant efficacy. In 1996, N/OFQ was formally identified with an innovative analgesic profile. Approximately 20 yr later, cebranopadol as a clinical ligand is advancing through the human trials process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cebranopadol is a novel, first-in-class analgesic with agonist activity at the nociceptin/orphanin FQ opioid peptide (NOP) receptor as well as the classical opioid peptide receptors. This study investigated the anti-hypersensitive effect of cebranopadol in a rat model of arthritic pain. Selective antagonists were used to probe the involvement of the NOP receptor and the µ-opioid peptide (MOP) receptors. Experimental mono-arthritis was induced by intra-articular injection of complete Freund's adjuvant into the left hind knee joint. Intravenous (i.v.) administration of cebranopadol 0.8–8.0 µg/kg to rats 5 days after induction of arthritis elicited dose-dependent increases in weight bearing on the affected limb. The quarter-maximal effective dose (ED 25 ) for this anti-hypersensitive effect of cebranopadol was 1.6 µg/kg i.v. (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8, 1.6). The ED 25 increased to 3.2 µg/kg i.v. (95% CI: 2.4, 4.0) following pretreatment with the selective NOP receptor antagonist J-113397 and to 18.3 µg/kg i.v. (95% CI: 9.6, 146.0) following pretreatment with the MOP receptor antagonist naloxone (at intraperitoneal antagonist doses of 4.64 mg/kg and 1.0 mg/kg, respectively). The MOP receptor agonist morphine and the NOP receptor agonist Ro65–6570 also elicited increases in weight bearing on the affected limb. The anti-hypersensitive effect of morphine 2.15 mg/kg i.v. was inhibited by naloxone but not by J-113397. Conversely, the anti-hypersensitive effect of Ro65–6570 0.464 mg/kg i.v. was inhibited by J-113397 but not by naloxone. In conclusion, cebranopadol evoked potent anti-hypersensitive efficacy in a rat model of arthritic pain, and this involved agonist activity at both the NOP and MOP receptors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There has been significant research to develop an ideal synthetic opioid. Opioids with variable properties possessing efficacy and with reduced side effects have been synthesized when compared to previously used agents. An opioid modulator is a drug that can produce both agonistic and antagonistic effects by binding to different opioid receptors and therefore cannot be classified as one or the other alone. These compounds can differ in their structures while still possessing opioid-mediated actions. This review will discuss TRV130 receptor modulators and other novel opioid receptor modulators, including Mitragyna "Kratom," Ignavine, Salvinorin-A, DPI-289, UFP-505, LP1, SKF-10,047, Cebranopadol, Naltrexone-14-O-sulfate, and Naloxegol. In summary, the structural elucidation of opioid receptors, allosteric modulation of opioid receptors, new opioid modulators and agonists, the employment of optogenetics, optopharmacology, and next-generation sequencing of opioid receptor genes and related functionality should create exciting new avenues for research and therapeutic development to treat conditions including pain, opioid abuse, and addiction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cebranopadol (a.k.a. GRT-6005) is a dually acting nociceptin/orphanin FQ and opioid receptor agonist that has been recently developed in Phase 2 clinical trials for painful diabetic neuropathy or cancer pain. It also showed analgesic properties in various rat models of pain and had a better safety profile as compared to equi-analgesic doses of morphine. Since antinociceptive properties of cebranopadol have been studied mainly in rat models, in the present study, we assessed analgesic activity of subcutaneous cebranopadol (10 mg/kg) in various mouse pain models.Methods: We used models of acute, tonic, and chronic pain induced by thermal and chemical stimuli, with a particular emphasis on pharmacoresistant chronic neuropathic pain evoked by oxaliplatin in which cebranopadol was used alone or in combination with simvastatin.Key results: As shown in the hot plate test, the analgesic activity of cebranopadol developed more slowly as compared to morphine (90-120 min vs. 60 min). Cebranopadol displayed a significant antinociceptive activity in acute pain models, i.e., the hot plate, writhing, and capsaicin tests. It attenuated nocifensive responses in both phases of the formalin test and reduced cold allodynia in oxaliplatin-induced neuropathic pain model. Its efficacy was similar to that of morphine. Used in combination and administered simultaneously, 4 or 6 h after simvastatin, cebranopadol did not potentiate antiallodynic activity of this cholesterol-lowering drug. Cebranopadol did not induce any motor deficits in the rotarod test.Conclusion: Cebranopadol may have significant potential for the treatment of various pain types, including inflammatory and chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a common condition, usually with the involvement of nociceptive and neuropathic pain components, high economic burden and impact on quality of life. Cebranopadol is a potent, first-in-class drug candidate with a novel mechanistic approach, combining nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide and opioid peptide receptor agonism. We conducted the first phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled trial, evaluating the analgesic efficacy, safety, and tolerability of cebranopadol in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic LBP with and without neuropathic pain component. Patients were treated for 14 weeks with cebranopadol 200, 400, or 600 μg once daily, tapentadol 200 mg twice daily, or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoints were the change from baseline pain to the weekly average 24-hour pain during the entire 12 weeks and during week 12 of the maintenance phase. Cebranopadol demonstrated analgesic efficacy, with statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements over placebo for all doses as did tapentadol. The responder analysis (≥30% or ≥50% pain reduction) confirmed these results. Cebranopadol and tapentadol displayed beneficial effects on sleep and functionality. Cebranopadol treatment was safe, with higher doses leading to higher treatment discontinuations because of treatment-emergent adverse events occurring mostly during titration. Those patients reaching the target doses had an acceptable tolerability profile. The incidence rate of most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events during maintenance phase was ≤10%. Although further optimizing the titration scheme to the optimal dose for individual patients is essential, cebranopadol is a new drug candidate with a novel mechanistic approach for potential chronic LBP treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) modulates several biological functions, including pain transmission via selective activation of a specific receptor named NOP. The aim of this study was the investigation of the antinociceptive properties of NOP agonists and their interaction with opioids in the trigeminal territory. The orofacial formalin (OFF) test in mice was used to investigate the antinociceptive potential associated to the activation of NOP and opioid receptors. Mice subjected to OFF test displayed the typical biphasic nociceptive response and sensitivity to opioid and NSAID drugs. Mice knockout for the NOP gene displayed a robust pronociceptive phenotype. The NOP selective agonist Ro 65-6570 (0.1–1 mg kg −1 ) and morphine (0.1–10 mg kg −1 ) elicited dose dependent antinociceptive effects in the OFF with the alkaloid showing larger effects; the isobologram analysis of their actions demonstrated an additive type of interaction. The mixed NOP/opioid receptor agonist cebranopadol elicited potent (0.01–0.1 mg kg −1 ) and robust antinociceptive effects. In the investigated dose range, all drugs did not modify the motor performance of the mice in the rotarod test. Collectively the results of this study demonstrated that selective NOP agonists and particularly mixed NOP/opioid agonists are worthy of development as innovative drugs to treat painful conditions of the trigeminal territory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

What is known and objective Chronic pain presents a difficult clinical challenge because of the limited efficacy, the limiting adverse-effect profile or the abuse potential of current analgesic options. Cebranopadol is a novel new agent in clinical trials that combines dual agonist action at opioid and nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide ( NOP) receptors. It is the first truly unique, centrally acting analgesic in several years. We here review the basic and clinical pharmacology of cebranopadol. Methods Published literature and Internet sources were searched to identify information related to the basic science (pharmacology and medicinal chemistry) and development (clinical trial) information on the mechanism of dual opioid and NOP receptor pharmacologic action in general, and for cebranopadol in particular. The identified sources were reviewed and the information synthesized. Results The preclinical testing of cebranopadol has characterized it as a dual opioid and NOP receptor agonist that displays antinociceptive and antihyperalgesic action in a variety of acute and chronic pain models in animals. Unlike most current traditional opioids, it is generally more potent against neuropathic than nociceptive pain. Several phase 2 clinical trials have been completed. What is new and conclusion Despite the medical need, a truly novel centrally acting analgesic has not been developed in many years. Cebranopadol represents a truly novel mechanistic approach. Its actual place in pain pharmacotherapy awaits the results of phase 3 clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of the study was to investigate the in vitro and in vivo pharmacological profile of cebranopadol, a novel agonist for opioid and nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) receptors (NOP). In vitro cebranopadol was assayed in calcium mobilization studies in cells coexpressing NOP or opioid receptors and chimeric G-proteins and in a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) assay for studying receptor interaction with G-protein and b-arrestin 2. The mouse tail withdrawal and formalin tests were used for investigating cebranopadol antinociceptive properties. In calcium mobilization studies cebranopadol showed the following rank order of potency NOP = mu > kappa ≥ delta. In BRET studies, cebranopadol promoted NOP and mu receptors interaction with G-protein with similar high potency and efficacy. However, cebranopadol did not stimulated NOP–b-arrestin 2 interactions and displayed reduced potency at mu/b-arrestin 2. In vivo, cebranopadol exhibits highly potent and extremely long-lasting antinociceptive effects. The effects of cebranopadol in the tail withdrawal assay were sensitive to both SB-612111 and naloxone. Collectively the present results confirm and extend previous finding demonstrating that cebranopadol, by acting as mixed NOP/opioid receptor agonist, elicits robust analgesic effects in different pain models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As a novel first-in-class potent analgesic acting as an agonist of multiple opioid receptors, cebranopadol showed high efficacy and good tolerability in a broad range of preclinical models and clinical trials related to pain. In the present study, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cebranopadol as a potential treatment of cocaine dependence, we tested the effects of cebranopadol with single and repeated doses (25, 50, 75, or 100 μg/kg, oral gavage) using rat models of cocaine fixed-ratio (FR) self-administration (SA), cocaine progressive-ratio (PR) SA, and sucrose pellet SA. In single-dosing treatment paradigm, cebranopadol significantly and dose-dependently reduced cocaine SA under FR and PR schedules and suppressed food intake under FR schedule without causing apparent side effects. In repeated-dosing treatment scheme, i.e. daily administration of 25, 50, 75, or 100 μg/kg cebranopadol for a week, the similar reduction in cocaine intake was detected, while non-negligible complications/side effects were observed at repeated high doses (75 and 100 μg/kg). The observed side effects were similar to the common toxic signs elicited by heroin at high doses, although cebranopadol did not fully substitute heroin's discriminative stimulant effects in our drug discriminative tests. These results demonstrated that the most appropriate oral dose of cebranopadol to balance the efficacy and safety is 50 μg/kg. Collectively, although cebranopadol may serve as a new treatment for cocaine dependence, more consideration, cautiousness, and a clear optimal dose window to dissociate its therapeutic effects from opioid side effects/complications in male and female subjects will be necessary to increase its practical clinical utility. • Cebranopadol is known as a candidate for treatment of pain and cocaine dependence. • Administration of cebranopadol dose-dependently reduced cocaine self-administration. • Repeated high doses (≥75 μg/kg) of cebranopadol led to significant adverse effects. • Cebranopadol-induced adverse effects were similar to classic opioid adverse effects. • Cebranopadol did not fully substitute heroin's discriminative stimulant effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]