Search

The aim of this study was to understand experiences of wait time among patients awaiting scheduled orthopaedic or cardiac surgery. Using a qualitative approach, 32 patients completed two interviews each regarding their wait time experiences, including effects of waiting. Patient experiences of wait time varied regardless of actual wait time and included reports of restriction, uncertainty, resignation, coping and opportunity. Participants’ waiting experiences indicate a complex relationship between greater symptom severity and less tolerance for wait time. We suggest healthcare resources focus on alleviating the deleterious effects of waiting for certain patients rather than reducing absolute wait times. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The strong male predominance in oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) and Barrett’s oesophagus (BO) continues to puzzle. Hormonal influence, e.g. oestrogen or oxytocin, might contribute. Methods: This genetic-epidemiological study pooled 14 studies from three continents, Australia, Europe, and North America. Polymorphisms in 3 key genes coding for the oestrogen pathway (receptor alpha (ESR1), receptor beta (ESR2), and aromatase (CYP19A1)), and 3 key genes of the oxytocin pathway (the oxytocin receptor (OXTR), oxytocin protein (OXT), and cyclic ADP ribose hydrolase glycoprotein (CD38)), were analysed using a gene-based approach, versatile gene-based test association study (VEGAS). Results: Among 1508 OAC patients, 2383 BO patients, and 2170 controls, genetic variants within ESR1 were associated with BO in males (p = 0.0058) and an increased risk of OAC and BO combined in males (p = 0.0023). Genetic variants within OXTR were associated with an increased risk of BO in both sexes combined (p = 0.0035) and in males (p = 0.0012). We followed up these suggestive findings in a further smaller data set, but found no replication. There were no significant associations between the other 4 genes studied and risk of OAC, BO, separately on in combination, in males and females combined or in males only. Conclusion: Genetic variants in the oestrogen receptor alpha and the oxytocin receptor may be associated with an increased risk of BO or OAC, but replication in other large samples are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) has increased substantially in recent decades. Multiple risk factors have been identified for EA and its precursor, Barrett’s esophagus (BE), such as reflux, European ancestry, male sex, obesity, and tobacco smoking, and several germline genetic variants were recently associated with disease risk. Using data from the Barrett’s and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Consortium (BEACON) genome-wide association study (GWAS) of 2,515 EA cases, 3,295 BE cases, and 3,207 controls, we examined single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that potentially affect the biogenesis or biological activity of microRNAs (miRNAs), small non-coding RNAs implicated in post-transcriptional gene regulation, and deregulated in many cancers, including EA. Polymorphisms in three classes of genes were examined for association with risk of EA or BE: miRNA biogenesis genes (157 SNPs, 21 genes); miRNA gene loci (234 SNPs, 210 genes); and miRNA-targeted mRNAs (177 SNPs, 158 genes). Nominal associations (P<0.05) of 29 SNPs with EA risk, and 25 SNPs with BE risk, were observed. None remained significant after correction for multiple comparisons (FDR q>0.50), and we did not find evidence for interactions between variants analyzed and two risk factors for EA/BE (smoking and obesity). This analysis provides the most extensive assessment to date of miRNA-related SNPs in relation to risk of EA and BE. While common genetic variants within components of the miRNA biogenesis core pathway appear unlikely to modulate susceptibility to EA or BE, further studies may be warranted to examine potential associations between unassessed variants in miRNA genes and targets with disease risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Previous studies have evidenced an association between gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA). It is unknown to what extent these associations vary by population, age, sex, body mass index, and cigarette smoking, or whether duration and frequency of symptoms interact in predicting risk. The Barrett’s and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Consortium (BEACON) allowed an in-depth assessment of these issues. Methods: Detailed information on heartburn and regurgitation symptoms and covariates were available from five BEACON case-control studies of EA and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (EGJA). We conducted single-study multivariable logistic regressions followed by random-effects meta-analysis. Stratified analyses, meta-regressions, and sensitivity analyses were also conducted. Results: Five studies provided 1,128 EA cases, 1,229 EGJA cases, and 4,057 controls for analysis. All summary estimates indicated positive, significant associations between heartburn/regurgitation symptoms and EA. Increasing heartburn duration was associated with increasing EA risk; odds ratios were 2.80, 3.85, and 6.24 for symptom durations of <10 years, 10 to <20 years, and ≥20 years. Associations with EGJA were slighter weaker, but still statistically significant for those with the highest exposure. Both frequency and duration of heartburn/regurgitation symptoms were independently associated with higher risk. We observed similar strengths of associations when stratified by age, sex, cigarette smoking, and body mass index. Conclusions: This analysis indicates that the association between heartburn/regurgitation symptoms and EA is strong, increases with increased duration and/or frequency, and is consistent across major risk factors. Weaker associations for EGJA suggest that this cancer site has a dissimilar pathogenesis or represents a mixed population of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although implicated in the pathogenesis of several chronic inflammatory disorders and hematologic malignancies, telomerase mutations have not been thoroughly characterized in human cancers. The present study was performed to examine the frequency and potential clinical relevance of telomerase mutations in esophageal carcinomas. Methods: Sequencing techniques were used to evaluate mutational status of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) and telomerase RNA component (TERC) in neoplastic and adjacent normal mucosa from 143 esophageal cancer (EsC) patients. MTS, flow cytometry, time lapse microscopy, and murine xenograft techniques were used to assess proliferation, apoptosis, chemotaxis, and tumorigenicity of EsC cells expressing either wtTERT or TERT variants. Immunoprecipitation, immunoblot, immunofluorescence, promoter-reporter and qRT-PCR techniques were used to evaluate interactions of TERT and several TERT variants with BRG-1 and β-catenin, and to assess expression of cytoskeletal proteins, and cell signaling. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization and spectral karyotyping techniques were used to examine telomere length and chromosomal stability. Results: Sequencing analysis revealed one deletion involving TERC (TERC del 341-360), and two non-synonymous TERT variants [A279T (2 homozygous, 9 heterozygous); A1062T (4 heterozygous)]. The minor allele frequency of the A279T variant was five-fold higher in EsC patients compared to healthy blood donors (p<0.01). Relative to wtTERT, A279T decreased telomere length, destabilized TERT-BRG-1-β-catenin complex, markedly depleted β-catenin, and down-regulated canonical Wnt signaling in cancer cells; these phenomena coincided with decreased proliferation, depletion of additional cytoskeletal proteins, impaired chemotaxis, increased chemosensitivity, and significantly decreased tumorigenicity of EsC cells. A279T expression significantly increased chromosomal aberrations in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) following Zeocin™ exposure, as well as Li Fraumeni fibroblasts in the absence of pharmacologically-induced DNA damage. Conclusions: A279T induces telomere dysfunction and inhibits non-canonical telomerase activity in esophageal cancer cells. These findings warrant further analysis of A279T expression in esophageal cancers and premalignant esophageal lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate loss of imprinting (LOI) and expression of the IGF2 gene in matched esophageal normal and adenocarcinoma tissues, we studied a prospective cohort of 77 patients who underwent esophageal resection between 1998 and 2003. IGF2 imprinting status was determined by reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (PCR) following ApaI digestion, and quantitative PCR was used to evaluate IGF2 expression, which was correlated with clinicopathologic findings, disease-free and overall survival. In total, 32% (14/44) of informative tissues showed loss of IGF2 imprinting, with a strong correlation between the tumor and normal esophageal epithelia (Kappa = 0.89, P < 0.01). Normal epithelia with LOI had increased expression of IGF2 [median: 2.91, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93–5.06] compared with imprinted normal epithelia (median: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.85–1.39) (P = 0.03). In contrast, tumors with LOI had significantly reduced IGF2 expression (median: 1.87, 95% CI: 0.53–5.21) compared with normally imprinted tumors (median: 6.79, 95% CI: 3.39–15.89) (P = 0.016). Patients below the age of 65 years with normally imprinted tumors had significantly reduced 5 year disease-free survival (DFS) (24%) compared with patients whose tumors had LOI for IGF2 (55%) (P = 0.03). Cox regression analysis showed that IGF2 overexpression was associated with significantly reduced disease-free survival (P = 0.04). We conclude that in a subgroup of younger patients, loss of IGF2 imprinting was associated with improved outcome following esophageal resection. Expression of IGF2 in esophageal adenocarcinoma and normal esophageal epithelia depended on imprinting status and tissue type, suggesting novel molecular regulatory mechanisms in esophageal tumorigenesis. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the impact of waiting for elective surgery from the patient perspective, with a focus on maximum tolerance, quality of life, and the nature of the waiting experience. Searches were conducted using Medline, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and HealthSTAR. Twenty-seven original research articles were identified which included each of these three themes. The current literature suggested that first, patients tend to state longer wait times as unacceptable when they experienced severe symptoms or functional impairment. Second, the relationship between length of wait and health-related quality of life depended on the nature and severity of proposed surgical intervention at the time of booking. Third, the waiting experience was consistently described as stressful and anxiety provoking. While many patients expressed anger and frustration at communication within the system, the experience of waiting was not uniformly negative. Some patients experienced waiting as an opportunity to live full lives despite pain and disability. The relatively unexamined relationship between waiting, illness and patient experience of time represents an area for future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: The primary aim of this study was to test the widespread assumption that the viability of the gastric fundus is compromised by fundoplication, thereby limiting the use of stomach to reconstruct the upper gastrointestinal tract after esophageal resection. Methods: Between February 1991 and February 2006, a consecutive series of 142 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EADC) underwent esophageal resection. To reconstruct the upper gastrointestinal tract, all patients had a narrow gastric tube (greater curvature of stomach based on the right gastroepiploic artery) transposed through the posterior mediastinum to the left neck where an anastomosis to the cervical esophagus was performed. From a prospective database, 15 patients were identified to have undergone an ‘open’ fundoplication (transabdominal Nissen, n =11; transthoracic Belsey, n =4) from 12 to 23 years earlier. Outcomes were compared between patients with EADC who had undergone previous fundoplication, and patients with EADC who never had antireflux surgery. Results: Gastric transposition and cervical esophagogastrostomy were technically feasible in all patients. No significant differences in outcome were found between patient groups. Gastric necrosis developed in only one patient, who had not undergone previous fundoplication. Anastomotic leak rates after esophageal resection and reconstruction were not statistically different based on whether patients had undergone previous fundoplication (2/15, 13.3%) or not (16/127, 12.6%; p =0.99). Conclusions: With careful attention to surgical technique, previous fundoplication does not preclude the use of stomach to reconstruct the foregut after esophageal resection, refuting the notion that previous antireflux surgery is a relative contraindication to, or alters the approach to esophageal cancer surgery. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Overexpression of FGF-2 is associated with tumor recurrence and reduced survival after surgical resection of esophageal cancer, and these risks are reduced in tumors co-expressing the FGF antisense (FGF-AS) RNA. The aim of this study was to characterize the expression of alternatively spliced FGF-AS transcripts and encoded nudix-motif proteins in normal human tissues and in esophageal adenocarcinoma, and to correlate their expression with clinicopathologic findings and outcome. Three alternatively spliced FGF-AS transcripts encoding GFG/NUDT6 isoforms with distinct N termini were detected in various human tissues including esophageal adenocarcinoma. Expression of each isoform as a fusion protein with enhanced green fluorescent protein revealed differential subcellular trafficking: hGFG a is localized to mitochondria by an N-terminal targeting sequence (MTS), whereas hGFG b and hGFG c were localized in the cytoplasm and nucleus. Mutation/deletion analysis confirmed that the predicted MTS was necessary and sufficient for mitochondrial compartmentalization. The predominant FGF-AS mRNA expressed in esophageal tumors was splice variant b. GFG immunoreactivity was detected in the cytoplasm of all esophageal adenocarcinomas and in 88% of tumor cell nuclei. Although we found a trend towards reduced disease-free survival in patients with FGF-2 overexpressing esophageal adenocarcinomas, significantly worse disease-free survival was noted among patients whose tumors did not also overexpress the FGF-AS b isoform ( p = 0.03). Tetracycline-inducible FGF-AS b expression in stably transfected human Seg-1 esophageal adenocarcinoma cells resulted in a significant suppression of steady state FGF-2 mRNA content and cell proliferation. Our data implicate the FGF-AS b isoform in modulation of FGF-2 expression and clinical outcome in esophageal adenocarcinoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: The aim of this case-control study was to test the hypothesis that polymorphisms of the microsomal epoxide hydroxylase (mEH) and glutathione S-transferase (GST) genes modulate the susceptibility to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EADC) associated with smoking. Methods: Cases included patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (n =126), Barrett esophagus (BE) (n =125), and EADC (n =56); controls comprised 95 strictly asymptomatic individuals. Genomic DNA was extracted from blood samples, and PCR-based assays were used to genotype mEH (slow allele, fast allele, predicted activity) and GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1. Logistic regression was used to study associations between smoking and genotype, adjusting for age, gender and alcohol consumption. Results: Relative to asymptomatic controls, no significant differences were found for the distribution of mEH and GST polymorphic variants in cases with GERD, BE or EADC. Smoking was a risk factor for EADC, especially when cigarette exposure was greater than 30 pack-years (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 6.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2–17.32; P =0.001). The strong association between smoking and EADC was seen preferentially in patients with the active allele of either GSTM1 (OR 7.9, 95% CI 1.14–54.76; P =0.003) or GSTT1 (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.23–8.35; P =0.004). Conclusions: Cigarette smoking is an independent risk factor for EADC, and in particular for heavy smokers. The strong statistical association between smoking and risk for EADC in individuals with the active allele of either GSTM1 or GSTT1 may have potential clinical application in endoscopic surveillance programs to identify individuals with BE at increased risk for progression to EADC. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]