Search

Joanna Bieniek, Krzysztof Wilczynski, Jan Szewieczek Department of Geriatrics, School of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland Background: Management of geriatric patients would be simplified if a universally accepted definition of frailty for clinical use was defined. Among definitions of frailty, Fried frailty phenotype criteria constitute a common reference frame for many geriatric studies. However, this reference frame has been tested primarily in elderly patients presenting with relatively good health status. Objective: The aim of this article was to assess the usefulness and limitations of Fried frailty phenotype criteria in geriatric inpatients, characterized by comorbidity and functional impairments, and to estimate the frailty phenotype prevalence in this group. Patients and methods: Five hundred consecutive patients of the university hospital subacute geriatric ward, aged 79.0±8.4 years (67% women and 33% men), participated in this cross-sectional study. Comprehensive geriatric assessment and Fried frailty phenotype component evaluation were performed in all patients. Results: Multimorbidity (6.0±2.8 diseases) characterized our study group, with a wide range of clinical conditions and functional states (Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living 72.2±28.2 and Mini-Mental State Examination 23.6±7.1 scores). All five Fried frailty components were assessed in 65% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI] =60.8–69.2) (diagnostic group). One or more components were not feasible to be assessed in 35% of the remaining patients (nondiagnostic group) because of lack of past patient’s body mass control and/or cognitive or physical impairment. Patients from the nondiagnostic group, as compared to patients from the diagnostic group, presented with more advanced age, higher prevalence of dementia, lower prevalence of hypertension, lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure, body mass index, Mini-Mental State Examination and Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living. Despite diagnostic limitations, we found ≥3 positive criteria (thus, frailty diagnosis) in 54.2% of the study group (95% CI =49.8–58.6), with prevalence from 31.7% in sexagenarians to 67.6% in nonagenarians. Conclusion: Fried frailty phenotype criteria seem useful for geriatric inpatient assessment, despite diagnostic limitations. High prevalence of frailty among geriatric inpatients suggests that evaluation for frailty should be considered a part of the comprehensive geriatric assessment. Keywords: frail older adults, frailty phenotype, geriatric ward, multimorbidity, comprehensive geriatric assessment, geriatric subacute care

Introduction: Images featured in patient educational materials can enhance comprehension of medical conditions, particularly those associated with sensitive issues like erectile dysfunction (ED). Past research indicates that minority men are often underrepresented in online urological content and thus may not relate to the material. Objective: The present study aims to evaluate the representation of racial, ethnic, and sexual orientation diversity in ED and men's health content on reputable urology program websites. Methods: Websites of the top urology departments from U.S. News & World Reports 2022 rankings were reviewed as sources of high quality content. All subpages were reviewed to identify ED and men's health sites with extraction of photo and video imagery depicting human subjects. A three-person review team interpreted race, ethnicity, and sexual orientation categorically. Race was also interpreted using a numeric scale, Fitzpatrick skin rating, and median ratings classified as white (1-3) or non-white (4-6). Consensus ratings were summarized descriptively. Spearman's rank correlation was used to measure inter-rater reliability of Fitzpatrick ratings and MedCalc's z-test used to compare diversity proportions to national rates from census data. Results: The top 50 ranked urology program websites were reviewed. Seven programs did not have any patient-facing ED or men's health web pages. Nearly half of programs with sites did not contain any human images (n=19/43, 44%). A total of 113 images were collected and reviewed. Race in the 102 (90.3%) interpretable images included 6 (5.9%) Asian, 16 (15.7%) black, 75 (73.5%) white, and 5 (4.9%) other men. Latino men were represented in 3/70 (4.3%) images. Utilizing Fitzpatrick ratings, 94 (83.2%) subjects were classified as white and 19 (16.8%) non-white. Most images [67 (59.3%)] demonstrated a man without a partner which precluded sexual orientation evaluation. Of those pictured with a partner, 25 (92.6%) were interpreted as heterosexual and 2 (7.4%) as same sex. Between reviewer correlation coefficients for Fitzpatrick ratings ranged from 0.66-0.69. Table 1 compares interpreted image data to population benchmarks from United States census data. Conclusions: Limited imagery on academic urology ED websites continues to underrepresent some groups, namely Latinos. Although men in same sex relationships were depicted, the absolute number of such images was low. Conscious effort to improve diversity in online men's health, and namely ED, content is needed. Disclosure: No. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]