Search

Background: The clinical presentations in patients with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infections range from asymptomatic upper respiratory infections to acute respiratory failure with bilateral pulmonary infiltrates requiring mechanical ventilation. Clinicians often measured inflammatory markers in hospitalized patients to characterize the severity of the infection. Multiple studies published in 2020 reported information on the frequency of elevated inflammatory markers in hospitalized patients in various categories of disease severity. Methods: The PubMed database was searched using the terms “Inflammatory markers in COVID-19 patients” and “Clinical features of patients infected with COVID-19.” Thirty-three publications were analyzed in detail to determine which inflammatory markers were increased and the frequency of these increases in various clinical classifications, including patients requiring hospitalization, patients with pneumonia, patients with severe infection, patients requiring intensive care unit admission, and patients who died. Results: C-reactive protein (CRP) was the most frequently elevated inflammatory marker in all categories. Ferritin, D-dimer, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate levels were also frequently elevated. In general, frequencies were higher in patients with more severe infections. For example, 24 out of 24 patients who died had an elevated CRP level. Conclusion: This review provides concrete information about the frequency of various inflammatory markers in patients with COVID-19 infection who required hospitalization. It also provides us some insight into the approach clinicians took in the early phase of this pandemic in their efforts to characterize these patients and perhaps understand the disease process better. However, these results might suggest that clinicians and laboratory directors should develop protocols to optimize laboratory testing.

Objectives: The current guidelines for managing patients with sepsis include the early cultures, administration of antibiotics, and fluid resuscitation. Several clinical trials have tried to determine whether or not the administration of corticosteroids improves outcomes in these patients. This study analyzed the characteristics of a large group of critically ill patients who either had cortisol levels drawn during their intensive care unit management or had hydrocortisone administered during their management. Methods: A list of patients who had cortisol levels measured or who had hydrocortisone administered empirically for the treatment of sepsis was identified by the medical record department at University Medical Center in Lubbock, Texas. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included the need for mechanical ventilation, the need for renal replacement therapy, the need for vasopressors, length of stay, and the development of nosocomial infections. Results: This study included 351 patients, including 194 women (55.3%). The mean age was 62.9 ± 16.1 years. The mean admission SOFA score was 9.3 ± 3.63, the mean APACHE 2 score was 18.15 ± 7.7, and the mean lactic acid level was 3.8 ± 4.0 mmol/L. One hundred sixty-two patients required intubation, 262 required vasopressors, 215 developed acute kidney injury, and 319 had cortisol levels measured. The mean length of stay was 11.5 ± 13.7 days; the mortality rate was 32.2%. Multiple variable analysis demonstrated that higher cortisol levels were associated with increased mortality (44.1% if cortisol ⩾20 µg/dL versus 17.5% if cortisol