Search

Objectives: This paper aims to map home-living older adults' subjective perceptions, evaluations, and interpretations of various welfare technologies. Study design: Systematic literature review. Methods: The study was designed as a systematic literature review of qualitative studies. This systematic literature review was carried out according to the PRISMA statement and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO registration number CRD42020190206. The international electronic bibliographic databases included AMED, Academic, CINAHL, Cochrane Reviews, EMBASE, Google Scholar, MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The scientific evidence was synthesized using qualitative analysis. All aspects of the study method followed COREQ guidelines. Results: Following a detailed systematic search and screening of 1405 studies, 10 were included in the systematic review. The study shows that implementing Welfare Technology seems to prolong older adults' independent living in their own homes and was perceived as a complement to face-to-face contact with health care providers. Conclusions: This study indicated that older adults consider accepting Welfare Technology as it contributes to a sense of security and empowerment in their everyday lives.

Abstract Old age is the leading cause of impaired bodily function, which gradually increases healthcare service needs. To offer the best possible care in the home and to be able to detect health‐related functional impairment at an early stage, it is necessary to carry out systematic and structured observations. The assessment tool Subacute and Acute Dysfunction in the Elderly (SAFE) has been developed explicitly for these structured observations. This study aims to explore the experiences and challenges of home‐based care work team coordinators (WTCs) regarding the introduction and use of SAFE. Method The present qualitative study was performed following Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines. The data were collected through individual interviews (n = 3) and focus group (FG) interviews (n = 7). The interview transcripts were analysed using the Gioia method. Results Five aggregated dimensions were identified: Varying acceptance of SAFE, Structuring and quality‐assurance of home‐based nursing practice, Obstacles for the integration of SAFE in daily practice, Acceptance and use of SAFE require continuous supervision and SAFE contributes to increased quality of nursing care. Conclusion The introduction of SAFE contributes to a structured follow‐up of functional status in patients receiving home care. In order to incorporate the tool into home care practice, it is essential to set aside time to introduce the tool and to support nurses' use of it by offering continuous supervision.

Introduction Registered nurses are crucial in home care nursing for elderly patients, as detecting geriatric conditions can be difficult due to age-related changes or communication barriers. Disability is often overlooked in elderly care, requiring different assessment tools to determine patient status and necessary nursing interventions. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the subacute functional decline in the elderly (SAFE) instrument was implemented in some Oslo districts to detect early signs of sub acute functional decline in hospital and home care settings. However, the nurses’ perception of this new assessment tool and its effectiveness has not been evaluated. Objectives This study aims to explore home care nurses’ experiences and perceptions regarding the introduction and use of the new assessment tool, SAFE. Objectives were to conduct focus group interviews and perform qualitative analysis. Method The study followed Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines, had a qualitative design, and included 15 out of 60 permanently employed RNs at Oslo municipality's home care service in Frogner district. Data was collected via three focus group interviews and analyzed thematically. Results The study identified three themes: (1) Nurses learned to use SAFE through direct experience due to a lack of standard introduction or training. (2) SAFE supported patient-centred care by enabling communication, preventive work, and identifying patients’ needs. (3) Integrating SAFE into electronic databases and daily clinical work could improve nursing efficiency. Conclusion Overall, using SAFE can improve patient outcomes and care quality in home care, but clear guidelines, ongoing support, and standardized procedures are crucial for its effectiveness. Regular updates and complete management support are also necessary. The study's findings align with previous research and can guide the development and implementation of tools in home care to enhance patient outcomes and the quality of care delivered.