Search

We report the current status of the FlyBase annotated gene set for Drosophila melanogaster and highlight improvements based on high-throughput data. The FlyBase annotated gene set consists entirely of manually annotated gene models, with the exception of some classes of small non-coding RNAs. All gene models have been reviewed using evidence from high-throughput datasets, primarily from the modENCODE project. These datasets include RNA-Seq coverage data, RNA-Seq junction data, transcription start site profiles, and translation stop-codon read-through predictions. New annotation guidelines were developed to take into account the use of the high-throughput data. We describe how this flood of new data was incorporated into thousands of new and revised annotations. FlyBase has adopted a philosophy of excluding low-confidence and low-frequency data from gene model annotations; we also do not attempt to represent all possible permutations for complex and modularly organized genes. This has allowed us to produce a high-confidence, manageable gene annotation dataset that is available at FlyBase (http://flybase.org). Interesting aspects of new annotations include new genes (coding, non-coding, and antisense), many genes with alternative transcripts with very long 3′ UTRs (up to 15–18 kb), and a stunning mismatch in the number of male-specific genes (approximately 13% of all annotated gene models) vs. female-specific genes (less than 1%). The number of identified pseudogenes and mutations in the sequenced strain also increased significantly. We discuss remaining challenges, for instance, identification of functional small polypeptides and detection of alternative translation starts.

We have sequenced the genome of a second Drosophila species, Drosophila pseudoobscura, and compared this to the genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster, a primary model organism. Throughout evolution the vast majority of Drosophila genes have remained on the same chromosome arm, but within each arm gene order has been extensively reshuffled, leading to a minimum of 921 syntenic blocks shared between the species. A repetitive sequence is found in the D. pseudoobscura genome at many junctions between adjacent syntenic blocks. Analysis of this novel repetitive element family suggests that recombination between offset elements may have given rise to many paracentric inversions, thereby contributing to the shuffling of gene order in the D. pseudoobscura lineage. Based on sequence similarity and synteny, 10,516 putative orthologs have been identified as a core gene set conserved over 25–55 million years (Myr) since the pseudoobscura/melanogaster divergence. Genes expressed in the testes had higher amino acid sequence divergence than the genome-wide average, consistent with the rapid evolution of sex-specific proteins. Cis-regulatory sequences are more conserved than random and nearby sequences between the species—but the difference is slight, suggesting that the evolution of cis-regulatory elements is flexible. Overall, a pattern of repeat-mediated chromosomal rearrangement, and high coadaptation of both male genes and cis-regulatory sequences emerges as important themes of genome divergence between these species of Drosophila.

The lark gene was initially identified in a behavioral screen for flies that displayed circadian rhythm defects (Newby and Jackson, 1993, 1996). It encodes an RNAbinding protein of the RNA Recognition Motif (RRM) class. Whereas lark heterozygotes exhibit a rhythm defect, homozygotes die during embryonic development because of a zygotic requirement for the gene product. Subsequently, it was shown that there is also a maternal requirement for lark function during oogenesis and early embryonic development (McNeil et al., 1999). Currently, several fly labs are pursuing studies of LARK function as related to oogenesis and embryonic development. LARK protein contains three potential RNA binding domains, two RNA recognition motifs, and a single retroviral type zinc finger, that have been shown to be important for LARK function during development but appear to play functionally redundant roles in the circadian regulation of eclosion (Newby and Jackson, 1996; McNeil et al., 2000). The LARK protein is widely expressed in most if not all tissues and throughout development (Zhang et al., 2000). In the majority of cells that express LARK, the protein has a nuclear localization. A notable exception occurs in a subset of neurosecretory cells that express the neuropeptide crustacean cardioactive peptide (CCAP), in which LARK is cytoplasmic. Of interest for the rhythm phenotype, CCAP cells exhibit circadian changes in LARK abundance (Zhang et al., 2000). In order to further characterize LARK protein function we generated pP{UAS-lark T:Ivir }(UAS-lark-3HA, Fig. 1, panel a). To distinguish GAL4 driven expression of the UAS-lark transgene from endogenous LARK expression, sequences encoding a triple hemagglutinin (HA) epitope were incorporated into the construct immediately prior to the LARK stop codon. Seven independent UAS-lark3HA transgenic lines were generated and here we report the preliminary characterization of three of these lines. We employed one line carrying a second chromosome insertion (w; P{w mC UAS-lark }94A) and two lines with independent third chromosome insertions (w; P{w mC UAS-lark }9A and (w; P{w mC UAS-lark }23A). All three lines are homozygous viable and fertile. To examine the effect of LARK overexpression, we first used the strong ubiquitous Act5C-GAL4 driver to drive expression of UAS-lark-3HA transgenes. Flies carrying an Act5C-GAL4 third chromosome insert (balanced over TM6b, Tb) were crossed to flies homozygous for a UAS-lark-3HA transgene. Adults carrying both the Act5C-GAL4 driver and any of the three UAS-lark-3HA transgenes were never observed; i.e., the only adult progeny that resulted from these crosses carried the TM6b, Tb chromosome (Table 1). In the case of two of the UAS-lark-3HA lines, 94A and 9A, some of the LARK overexpressing flies were able to develop to the early pupal stage (as indicated by a few Tb pupae in the vials; data not shown). However, these individuals ceased to develop soon after pupal formation and no brown or black Tb pupae were observed in these crosses. In the case of crosses with the 23A UAS-lark-3HA line, Tb pupae were never observed, suggesting that ubiquitous overexpression of LARK from this insertion is lethal prior to pupation. To determine if the observed lethality was caused by increased LARK protein expression in the nervous system, we used an elav-GAL4 driver (c155) to express UAS-lark-3HA transgenes in all differentiated neurons. Such a pan-neural overexpression of LARK caused lethality, the severity of which was dependent on the particular UAS-lark-3HA line employed in crosses. For example, crosses of males bearing the X-linked elav-GAL4 driver to females homozygous for the 23A UAS-lark-3HA transgene failed to produce any female offspring (Table 1). In similar crosses with elav-GAL4 and either the 94A or 9A UAS-lark-3HA transgene, GAL4/UAS flies were observed to eclose at a reduced frequency compared to UAS sibling controls (Table 1). Of the GAL4/UAS flies that do eclose, all display a cuticle-tanning defect characterized by a significant delay in cuticle hardening and pigmentation (not seen in control flies). In addition, the GAL4/UAS flies do not show normal wing expansion (Fig. 1, panel b). With the 94A UAS-lark-3HA transgene, none of the GAL4/UAS flies ever expanded their wings. Approximately 2% of the GAL4/UAS flies displayed nor

Mental retardation is a pervasive societal problem, 25 times more common than blindness for example. Fragile X syndrome, the most common form of inherited mental retardation, is caused by mutations in the FMR1 gene. Fragile X patients display neurite morphology defects in the brain, suggesting that this may be the basis of their mental retardation. Drosophila contains a single homolog of FMR1, dfxr (also called dfmr1). We analyzed the role of dfxr in neurite development in three distinct neuronal classes. We find that DFXR is required for normal neurite extension, guidance, and branching. dfxr mutants also display strong eclosion failure and circadian rhythm defects. Interestingly, distinct neuronal cell types show different phenotypes, suggesting that dfxr differentially regulates diverse targets in the brain.

Molecular genetic analysis indicates that rhythmic changes in the abundance of the Drosophila lark RNA-binding protein are important for circadian regulation of adult eclosion (the emergence or ecdysis of the adult from the pupal case). To define the tissues and cell types that might be important for lark function, we have characterized the spatial and developmental patterns of lark protein expression. Using immunocytochemical or protein blotting methods, lark can be detected in late embryos and throughout postembryonic development, from the third instar larval stage to adulthood. At the late pupal (pharate adult) stage, lark protein has a broad pattern of tissue expression, which includes two groups of crustacean cardioactive peptide (CCAP)-containing neurons within the ventral nervous system. In other insects, the homologous neurons have been implicated in the physiological regulation of ecdysis. Whereas lark has a nuclear distribution in most cell types, it is present in the cytoplasm of the CCAP neurons and certain other cells, which suggests that the protein might execute two different RNA-binding functions. Lark protein exhibits significant circadian changes in abundance in at least one group of CCAP neurons, with abundance being lowest during the night, several hours prior to the time of adult ecdysis. Such a temporal profile is consistent with genetic evidence indicating that the protein serves a repressor function in mediating the clock regulation of adult ecdysis. In contrast, we did not observe circadian changes in CCAP neuropeptide abundance in late pupae, although CCAP amounts were decreased in newly-emerged adults, presumably because the peptide is released at the time of ecdysis. Given the cytoplasmic localization of the lark RNA-binding protein within CCAP neurons, and the known role of CCAP in the control of ecdysis, we suggest that changes in lark abundance may regulate the translation of a factor important for CCAP release or CCAP cell excitability. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Neurobiol 45: 14–29, 2000