1. Author's Reply to Comment by Greaves et al. on "Phosphine in the Venusian Atmosphere: A Strict Upper Limit From SOFIA GREAT Observations".
- Author
-
Cordiner, M. A., Wiesemeyer, H., Villanueva, G. L., de Pater, I., Stutzki, J., Liuzzi, G., Aladro, R., Charnley, S. B., Cosentino, R., Faggi, S., Kofman, V., McGuire, B. A., Milam, S. N., Moullet, A., Nixon, C. A., and Thelen, A. E.
- Subjects
VENUSIAN atmosphere ,UPPER atmosphere ,PHOSPHINE ,INFRARED astronomy ,ARCHAEOLOGY methodology ,PHOSPHINES - Abstract
In an attempt to understand the findings presented in the Comment by Greaves et al. (2023, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL103539), we followed their data analysis methodology, omitting the hot and cold‐load calibrations that are an important part of the standard SOFIA GREAT instrument calibration procedure. This process requires scaling of the Venus off‐source spectra by an arbitrary factor, which in turn introduces residuals of the intrinsic receiver bandpass shape as spurious components in the resulting line/continuum spectra. Although these additional artifacts can be reduced via Fourier‐domain spectral filtering, their removal depends on an ill‐constrained interpolation of the Venus continuum across the PH3 spectral line positions, resulting in an unreliable final spectrum. We therefore conclude that the PH3 lines claimed to be detected in the Comment by Greaves et al. (2023, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL103539) originate from data/analysis artifacts, and confirm our original result that there is no evidence for phosphine in the SOFIA Venus data. Plain Language Summary: We performed observations using a unique, flying telescope—the Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA)—to search for a gas called phosphine in the atmosphere of Venus, which has been suggested to be an indicator for life. The observations, published by Cordiner et al. (2022, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022gl101055), were analyzed carefully but showed no evidence of phosphine. Our findings were called into question in the Comment by Greaves et al. (2023, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL103539), who claimed to find phosphine lines in the SOFIA observations after following an unconventional data analysis method. We have investigated their method, and conclude that it is likely to introduce spurious signals into the data, so the claimed phosphine detection is therefore not significant. Key Points: The revised calibration procedure adopted by Greaves et al. (2023, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL103539) introduces additional receiver artifacts into the SOFIA 4G2 Venus spectraThe claimed PH3 detection is likely a result of this, combined with interpolation artifacts that occur during subsequent Fourier filteringWe confirm our original conclusion that there is no evidence for phosphine in the SOFIA GREAT Venus data [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF