Search

Objective: Most of the fractures and dislocations are reduced in the emergency setting. Many drugs are available for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department (ED); however, the adverse effects are still a common problem. The aim of our study was to compare the 2 drug combinations. Method: We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of patients presenting to the ED after a traumatic event and required urgent reduction either for a fracture or dislocation. Patients were randomized to midazolam-fentanyl (MF) group or ketamine-low-dose midazolam (KM) group. Hypoxia, duration of hypoxia, need for oxygen, time to onset of sedation, recovery time, pain scores during reduction, and sedation depth were set as primary outcome measures and were recorded. Results: A total of 498 patients who presented to ED with extremity injury and required closed reduction were assessed; 130 of them were approached for eligibility and 69 patients were excluded. The remaining 61 patients were randomized to either KM group (n = 31) or MF group (n = 30). Hypoxia and duration of hypoxia were significantly lower in the KM group compared with the MF group. Patients in the KM group reported significantly lower pain scores during reduction; however, adverse effects were higher compared with MF group. Conclusion: Both drug combinations can be effectively used for procedural sedation and analgesia; however, with lower risk for hypoxia and lower pain scores, KM combination stands as a reasonable choice for orthopedic interventions in the emergency unit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic and the prognostic value of a laboratory panel consisting of mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP), procalcitonin (PCT), and mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) for patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute dyspnea.Methods: We prospectively enrolled ED patients who presented with a chief complaint of dyspnea and who had an uncertain diagnosis after physician evaluation. Final primary diagnosis of the cause of shortness of breath was confirmed through additional testing per physician discretion. We recorded inpatient admission and 30-day mortality rates.Results: One hundred fifty-four patients were enrolled in the study. Congestive heart failure exacerbation was the final primary diagnosis in 42.2% of patients, while infectious etiology was diagnosed in 33.1% of patients. For the diagnosis of congestive heart failure exacerbation, MR-proANP had a sensitivity of 92.7% and specificity of 36.8%, with a negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.16 and a positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 1.44 (cut-off value: 120 pmol/L). For the diagnosis of an infectious etiology, PCT had a 96.5% specificity and 48.8% sensitivity (LR-: 0.58, LR+: 13.8, cutoff value: 0.25 ng/mL). As a prognostic indicator, MR-proADM demonstrated similar values: odds ratio for 30-day mortality was 8.5 (95% CI, 2.5-28.5, cutoff value: 1.5 nmol/L) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in predicting mortality was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.71-0.91).Conclusion: The good negative LR- of MR-proANP and the good positive LR+ of PCT may suggest a role for these markers in the early diagnosis of ED patients with dyspnea. Furthermore, MR-proADM may assist in risk stratification and prognosis in these patients.. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]