Search

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) and potential prescription omissions (PPOs) in a Spanish cohort of people living with HIV (PLWH) aged ≥65 years and to identify risk factors for the presence of PIPs and PPOs. Methods: This retrospective cross‐sectional study was conducted across 10 public hospitals in the Autonomous Community of Madrid, Spain. Clinical and demographic data were cross‐checked against hospital and community pharmacy dispensation registries. PIPs and PPOs were assessed using the American Geriatrics Society (AGS)/Beers and Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions (STOPP)/Screening Tool to Alert Doctors to Right Treatment (START) criteria. Risk factors for PIPs and PPOs and agreement between AGS/Beers and STOPP/START criteria were statistically analysed. Results: This study included 313 PLWH (median age 72 years), of whom 80.5% were men. PIP prevalence rates were 29.4% and 44.4% based on the AGS/Beers and STOPP criteria, respectively. The concordance between AGS/Beers and STOPP criteria was moderate. Benzodiazepines and proton pump inhibitors were the chronic comedications most commonly involved in PIPs. PPOs were observed in 61.4% of the patients. The leading omissions were insufficient influenza and pneumococcal vaccine coverage and inadequate bone health‐related treatments. The number of chronic comedications, female sex, neuropsychiatric disorders, and cancer diagnosis were risk factors for PIPs, whereas osteopenia and osteoporosis were risk factors for PPOs. Conclusions: A high prevalence of PIPs and PPOs was observed in our cohort of older PLWH. These findings emphasize the importance of comprehensive medication reviews in this population to reduce inappropriate medication use and address their specific and underserved therapeutic needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale, aims, and objectives To evaluate the effect of an electronic medication administration record (eMAR) application on the rate of medication errors in medication administration recording (ME-MAR). Methods A before-and-after, quasiexperimental study was conducted in a university hospital that implemented the eMAR application in March 2014. Data collection was conducted in April 2012 (pre-) and June 2014 (post-) by two pharmacists. The ME-MARs were analysed by the staff involved to identify their cause. The two pharmacists independently classified the ME-MARs. In the case of disagreement, a research team examined the ME-MARs and categorized them by consensus. Three classifications were used: A classic medication error taxonomy and 2 technology-induced error taxonomies. Results The pharmacists analysed 2835 (pre-) and 2621 (post-) medication administration records (MAR), respectively. Overall, the ME-MAR rate decreased from 48.0% (pre-) to 36.9% (post-) ( P < .05). The same types of ME-MAR were observed in both phases except for 'MAR with incomplete information,' which was not observed in the postimplementation phase. In both phases, the most frequent ME-MAR was 'MAR at the wrong time' (MAR before or after medication administration) (31.6% vs 30.2%). The main cause of ME-MARs in both phases was the failure to follow work procedures. The potential future risk of ME-MARs significantly decreased after the eMAR implementation ( P < .05). All ME-MARs were 'use errors' because of human factors. New ME-MARs (1.24%; n = 12) were observed in the postimplementation phase. Conclusion Use of the eMAR application significantly reduces the rate of ME-MAR and their potential risk. The main cause of ME-MAR was the failure to follow work procedures . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale, aims and objectives The aim of this study is to adapt and assess the interrater reliability of a potential future risk matrix for medication errors in medication administration recording (ME-MAR). Methods The study was carried out in a teaching hospital. It was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, a consensus method was used in order to adapt the potential future risk matrix published by the National Patient Safety and Otero et al. to the ME-MAR. The consensus method consisted in a nominal group formed by four pharmacists. In the second phase, a multidisciplinary group of experts in patient safety assessed the reliability of the adapted matrix. Five raters evaluated 100 ME-MAR. Its reliability was evaluated using the kappa statistic. Results In the first phase, two meetings were necessary until consensus was reached to adapt the potential future risk matrix to the ME-MAR. For this purpose, the two following categories were defined: likelihood of ME-MAR's recurrence and most likely consequences of ME-MAR. The definition of each grade of likelihood of recurrence was based on the incidence of ME-MAR from an unpublished study carried out in our hospital. In order to determine the most likely consequences of ME-MAR, a two-dimensional matrix was designed, with severity per type of ME-MAR on one axis and the class of medication on the other. In the second phase, the reliability of the matrix was tested. The overall interrater agreement for the five raters was substantial at 0.68 (Confidence interval 95% 0.60-0.76). Conclusion The adapted matrix of potential future risk to ME-MAR is reliable and can serve as a guide for future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Although outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) can be a good approach to treatment of infections, a lack of data regarding antibiotic stability in portable elastomeric infusion devices restricts its safe, appropriate, and effective use. The objective of this work was to complete a systematic peer-reviewed analysis of published articles about antibiotic stability in elastomeric infusion devices that provide evidence supporting their use in OPAT. Summary A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted in January 2021 to identify published articles about antibiotic stability in portable elastomeric infusion devices. The databases used were PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and a Cochrane database. A total of 1,615 original studies and conference communications were found. After title, abstract, and full-text review, 33 articles met the inclusion criteria. The data obtained included information about the stability of 30 different antibiotics. To our knowledge, this is the first review to summarize the available published data on the stability of antibiotics in portable elastomeric infusion devices. The results highlight the poor stability of some antibiotics in solution and the variability of the laboratory conditions in the included studies. Conclusion This systematic review can serve as a useful resource for healthcare professionals involved in providing OPAT using portable elastomeric infusion devices. However, further stability studies should be performed, especially high-quality studies simulating real-life time and temperature conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]