Search

Introduction. It has been theorised that the relationship between smaller body size and smaller ruptured intracranial aneurysms in Asians indirectly supports the treatment of small, unruptured intracranial aneurysms. There has also been uncertainty regarding whether the progress that has been made in neuroimaging allows for better detection of smaller ruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms. Therefore, we conducted this systemic review of ruptured intracranial saccular aneurysm sizes according to region and time. Material and Methods. Computerised MEDLINE and PubMed searches of the literature for population-based studies of ruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms were carried out from 1 January 1980 to 1 March 2011. Statistical analyses were generated using SPSS for Windows, Version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and Comprehensive MetaAnalysis 2.0 for Windows (Biostat, Englewood, NJ). The results of the meta-analyses are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results. Six eligible population- or hospital-based studies were analysed. The percentage of ruptured intracranial aneurysms measuring less than 5 mm was 28.4% (95% CI: 18.1% to 41.6%, I2 = 98%). The percentage of ruptured intracranial aneurysms measuring less than 10 mm was 76.7% (95% CI: 69.2% to 82.9%, I2 = 89%). A higher proportion of patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms of less than 5 mm was found in Asia compared to other regions. Similarly, a higher proportion of patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms of less than 10 mm was found in Asia compared to other regions. Conclusions. The present findings suggest that ruptured intracranial aneurysms are smaller in Asians and should be confirmed in future prospective international multi-centre registries to assess ethnicity. Whether these findings support treating smaller unruptured intracranial aneurysms in Asians should be investigated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The timing of definitive aneurysm treatment (coiling or clipping) in acute aneurysm subarachnoid hemorrhage was a subject of controversy. Although most vascular neurosurgeons agreed on early aneurysm treatment (within the first 72 hours), whether ultra-early aneurysm treatment (within the first 24 hours) was beneficial remained debatable. We aimed to investigate whether ultra-early aneurysm treatment is associated with better neurological outcome in all patients or only good-grade patients or only poor-grade patients. Methods: Two-hundred and seventy-six (84%) patients had hemorrhage onset time and aneurysm treatment time available for analysis. Values of P < 0.05 were taken as statistically significant, and P values between 0.05 and 0.10 were considered to be a trend. Results: For the 96 poor-grade (World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grading scale 4 to 5) patients, there was a significant association between Short Form-36 mental scores and ultra-early aneurysm treatment (50 ± 10 vs. 46 ± 10, P = 0.019) and a trend toward association between ultra-early surgery and favorable neurological outcome (odds ratio 2.4 [95% confidence interval 1.0 to 6.0], P = 0.062). A reduction in clinical rebleeding (12% vs. 22%, P = 0.168) was observed in patients undergoing ultra-early aneurysm treatment. Conclusions: Aneurysm treatment performed within the 24-hour window may be associated with a better outcome and halve the clinical rebleeding risk in poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]