Search

MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) lesioning is an innovative, safe and effective treatment which provides an innovative development in the field of minimally invasive stereotactic neurosurgery. Based on the application of focused ultrasound energy under full MR planning and thermal imaging control, unilateral lesioning of the thalamus, subthalamic nucleus, and globus pallidus is indicated for the treatment of movement disorders, including essential tremor, Parkinson's disease, and dystonia. We started to apply this technique in February 2019 for the treatment of patients with movement disorders. The authors developed a diagnostic therapeutic care pathway, which is herewith proposed and applied as an explication of standard clinical practice in use. The project was the result of the application of different methods such as Health Technology Assessment (HTA), Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats analysis (SWOT) and Demin-Plan, Do, Check, Act (PDCA) cycle. The aim of this project was to standardize the MRgFUS diagnostic-therapeutic pathway (DTP), describe its application and the appropriateness of different phases (patient selection, intervention phase and follow-up). Here, we described in detail our experience in the DTP application from 2019 up to now in 610 patients with movement disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Effects of dopaminergic medications used to treat Parkinson's disease (PD) may be compared with each other by using conversion factors, calculated as Levodopa equivalent dose (LED). However, current LED proposals on MAO‐B inhibitors (iMAO‐B) safinamide and rasagiline are still based on empirical approaches. Objectives: To estimate LED of safinamide 50 and 100 mg. Methods: In this multicenter, longitudinal, case–control study, we retrospectively reviewed clinical charts of 500 consecutive PD patients with motor complications and treated with (i) safinamide 100 mg (N = 130), safinamide 50 mg (N = 144), or rasagiline 1 mg (N = 97) for 9 ± 3 months and a control group of patients never treated with any iMAO‐B (N = 129). Results: Major baseline features (age, sex, disease duration and stage, severity of motor signs and motor complications) were similar among the groups. Patients on rasagiline had lower UPDRS‐II scores and Levodopa dose than control subjects. After a mean follow‐up of 8.8‐to‐10.1 months, patients on Safinamide 50 mg and 100 mg had lower UPDRS‐III and OFF‐related UPDRS‐IV scores than control subjects, who in turn had larger increase in total LED than the three iMAO‐B groups. After adjusting for age, disease duration, duration of follow‐up, baseline values and taking change in UPDRS‐III scores into account (sensitivity analysis), safinamide 100 mg corresponded to 125 mg LED, whereas safinamide 50 mg and rasagiline 1 mg equally corresponded to 100 mg LED. Conclusions: We used a rigorous approach to calculate LED of safinamide 50 and 100 mg. Large prospective pragmatic trials are needed to replicate our findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Understanding the pathophysiology and genetic background of Parkinson's disease (PD) increases the likelihood of developing effective disease-modifying therapeutic strategies. In particular, the discovery of genetic variants causing or increasing the risk for PD has contributed to refining the clinical, biological, and molecular classification of the disease and has offered new insights into sporadic forms. It is even more evident that specific genetic mutations can show different responses to pharmacological and device-aided therapies. To date, several agents acting on multiple PD-causing pathogenic pathways have been tested as disease-modifying strategies, with disappointing results. This may be caused by the recruitment of PD populations whose underlying molecular pathophysiology is heterogeneous. We believe that an effective model of personalized medicine must be prioritized in the near future. Here, we review the current therapeutic options under clinical and preclinical development for PD and discuss the key pending questions and challenges to face for successful clinical trials. Furthermore, we provide some insights into the role of genetics in guiding the decision-making process on symptomatic and device-aided therapies for PD in daily clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]