Search

• Four types of reactions from leading vehicles when being tailgated were identified. • Changing lanes was the most prevalent reaction by leading vehicle. • Random Forests analysis showed three main factors related to lead vehicle's reactions. • For 95% of the cases, vehicles change lanes when being tailgated for over two minutes. • Male drivers were overrepresented in the tailgating events. • Middle-aged drivers tailgated more frequently than the other cohorts. Background: Tailgating is a common aggressive driving behavior that has been identified as one of the leading causes of rear-end crashes. Previous studies have explored the behavior of tailgating drivers and have reported effective solutions to decrease the amount or prevalence of tailgating. This paper tries to fill the research gap by focusing on understanding highway tailgating scenarios and examining the leading vehicles' reaction using existing naturalistic driving data. Method: A total of 1,255 tailgating events were identified by using the one-second time headway threshold criterion. Four types of reactions from the leading vehicles were identified, including changing lanes, slowing down, speeding up, and making no response. A Random Forests algorithm was employed in this study to predict the leading vehicle's reaction based on corresponding factors including driver, vehicle, and environmental variables. Results: The analysis of the tailgating scenarios and associated factors showed that male drivers were more frequently involved in tailgating events than female drivers and that tailgating was more prevalent under sunny weather and in daytime conditions. Changing lanes was the most prevalent reaction from the leading vehicle during tailgating, which accounted for more than half of the total events. The results of Random Forests showed that mean time headway, duration of tailgating, and minimum time headway were three main factors, which had the greatest impact on the leading vehicle drivers' reaction. It was found that in 95% of the events, leading vehicles would change lanes when being tailgated for two minutes or longer. Practical Applications: Results of this study can help to better understand the behavior and decision making of drivers. This understanding can be used in designing countermeasures or assistance systems to reduce tailgating behavior and related negative safety consequences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Enhanced dynamic Forward Collision Warning (FCW) model tailored for hazmat truck drivers with varying driving characteristics and risk levels. • Multi-objective optimization method employed to determine the optimal warning time considering real-time driving risk, driver acceptance, and driving comfort. • Differentiation in optimal warning times for driver categories under mid-level and low-level risks, while similar warning time for high-level risks. • Development of user profiles based on historical driving records improves driver trust and enhances driving safety with ADAS systems. The risky driving behavior of hazmat truck drivers is a crucial factor in many severe traffic accidents. In-vehicle Advanced Driving Assistance Systems (ADAS), integrating vehicle active safety and driver assistance technology, has been installed into hazmat trucks aiming to reduce driving risks during emergencies. This paper presents an enhanced dynamic Forward Collision Warning (FCW) model tailored for hazmat truck drivers with different driving characteristics and risk levels. Our objective is to determine the optimal moment to alert drivers during risky situations. The novelty of our approach lies in analyzing the driver's response mechanism to the warning by considering their characteristics and real-time driving risk levels. We employ a multi-objective optimization method that integrates real-time driving risk, driver acceptance, and driving comfort to calculate the optimal warning time. Our findings indicate that the appropriate warning time is similar for all drivers under high-level risks, while significant differentiation exists for different driver categories under mid-level and low-level risks. Additionally, aggressive drivers tend to follow leading vehicles closely and exhibit lower deceleration intentions when faced with dangers compared to normal and cautious drivers. Our research outcomes enable the development of user profiles for hazmat truck drivers based on extensive historical driving records, facilitating the analysis of driver response differences to FCWs. This enhances driving safety and improves driver trust in ADAS systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• A novel collision warning system is proposed based on the visual road environment schema. • This schema can quantify drivers' unequal attention to different road environmental elements and visual fields. • The visual motion state of vehicles is calculated by the sensitivity matrix and the vision matrix. • The effectiveness of this novel system is examined by vehicle and driver characteristics. • A grey target decision-making model is built to comprehensively evaluate the system. Drivers pay unequal attention to different road environmental elements and visual fields, which greatly influences their driving behavior. However, existing collision warning systems ignore these visual characteristics of drivers, which limits the performance of collision warning systems. Therefore, this study proposes a novel collision warning system based on the visual road environment schema, in order to enhance the support for avoiding potential dangers in objects and areas that are easily overlooked by the drivers' vision. To capture the above visual characteristics of drivers, the visual road environment schema that consists of the semantic layer, the scene depth layer, the sensitive layer, and the visual field layer is established by using several different deep neural networks, which realizes the recognition, quantization, and analysis of the road environment from the drivers' visual perspective. The effectiveness of the novel collision warning system is verified by the driving simulation experiment from six indicators, including warning distance, maximum lateral acceleration, maximum longitudinal deceleration, minimum collision time, reaction time, and heart rate. Additionally, a grey target decision-making model is built to comprehensively evaluate the system. The results show that compared with the traditional collision warning system, the novel collision warning system proposed in this study performs significantly better and can discover potential dangers earlier, give timely warnings, enhance the vehicles' lateral stability and driving comfort, shorten reaction time, and relieve the drivers' nervousness. By integrating the drivers' visual characteristics into the collision warning system, this study could help to optimize the existing collision warning system and promote the mutual understanding between intelligent vehicles and human drivers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]