Search

Glucocorticoids (GCs) represent the standard treatment for acute disease bouts in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, for which methylprednisolone (MP) pulse therapy is the most frequently used protocol. Here, we compared the efficacy of therapeutic and preventive MP application in MOG35-55-induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) in C57Bl/6 mice. When administered briefly after the onset of the disease, MP efficiently ameliorated EAE in a dose-dependent manner. Surprisingly, MP administration around the time of immunization was contraindicated as it even increased leukocyte infiltration into the CNS and worsened the disease symptoms. Our analyses suggest that in the latter case an incomplete depletion of peripheral T cells by MP triggers homeostatic proliferation, which presumably results in an enhanced priming of autoreactive T cells and causes an aggravated disease course. Thus, the timing and selection of a particular GC derivative require careful consideration in MS therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pre- and early clinical studies on patients with autoimmune diseases suggested that induction of regulatory T(Treg) cells may contribute to the immunosuppressive effects of glucocorticoids(GCs). Objective: We readdressed the influence of GC therapy on Treg cells in immunocompetent human subjects and naïve mice. Methods: Mice were treated with increasing doses of intravenous dexamethasone followed by oral taper, and Treg cells in spleen and blood were analyzed by FACS. Sixteen patients with sudden hearing loss but without an inflammatory disease received high-dose intravenous prednisolone followed by stepwise dose reduction to low oral prednisolone. Peripheral blood Treg cells were analyzed prior and after a 14 day GC therapy based on different markers. Results: Repeated GC administration to mice for three days dose-dependently decreased the absolute numbers of Treg cells in blood (100 mg dexamethasone/kg body weight: 2.8±1.8×104 cells/ml vs. 336116104 in control mice) and spleen (dexamethasone: 2.8±1.9×15/spleen vs. 956226105/spleen in control mice), which slowly recovered after 14 days taper in spleen but not in blood. The relative frequency of FOXP3+ Treg cells amongst the CD4+ T cells also decreased in a dose dependent manner with the effect being more pronounced in blood than in spleen. The suppressive capacity of Treg cells was unaltered by GC treatment in vitro. In immunocompetent humans, GCs induced mild T cell lymphocytosis. However, it did not change the relative frequency of circulating Treg cells in a relevant manner, although there was some variation depending on the definition of the Treg cells (FOXP3+: 4.0±1.5% vs 3.4±1.5%*; AITR+: 0.6±0.4 vs 0.5±0.3%, CD127low: 4.0±1.3 vs 5.0±3.0%* and CTLA4+: 13.8±11.5 vs 15.6±12.5%; * p<0.05). Conclusion: Short-term GC therapy does not induce the hitherto supposed increase in circulating Treg cell frequency, neither in immunocompetent humans nor in mice. Thus, it is questionable that the clinical efficacy of GCs is achieved by modulating Treg cell numbers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are involved in the modulation of macrophage function and thereby control the host's immune responses to pathogens. However, neither the role of hormone concentration nor the differential contribution of the glucocorticoid (GR) and the mineralocorticoid receptors (MR) to these activities are known. Here we show that low levels of corticosterone enhance NO production as well as mRNA expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and enzymes required for mediator synthesis. In contrast, at high corticosterone concentrations macrophage function was strongly repressed. Importantly, inactivation of the GR by lentiviral delivery of siRNAs abrogated both the immunostimulatory and the immunosuppressive GC actions whereas inactivation of the MR had no effect. Furthermore, removal of endogenous GCs by adrenalectomy in vivo induced a preactivated state in macrophages that could be modulated by corticosterone. We conclude that GCs exert distinct effects on macrophage function dependent on their concentration, and that they primarily act through the GR despite concomitant expression of the MR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Glucocorticoids (GCs) repress lymphocyte function by controlling gene expression. In this study, we investigated Ag-specific effector T cells and provide evidence that GCs also modulate these cells' cytoskeletal architecture by nongenomic mechanisms. Following GC treatment, effector T cells rapidly lose their polarized morphology, which impedes both their migratory capacity and their interaction with APCs. The cytoskeleton rearrangements are preceded by an activation of ezrin-radixin-moesin proteins, which transiently increases the cellular rigidity but seems to occur independently of altered tyrosine phosphorylation. Phospholipase C activity is critically involved in mediating these nongenomic effects, because its inhibition prevents both T cell depolarization and ezrin-radixin-moesin phosphorylation after GC exposure. GC administration in vivo induced similar morphological changes in effector T cells as observed in vitro, suggesting that the above process plays a role in modulating inflammatory diseases. Taken together, our findings identify a novel mechanism through which GCs rapidly repress T cell function independently of gene transcription. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The activity of acid sphingomyelinase (aSMase) was previously reported to be involved in glucocorticoid-induced cell death (GICD) of T lymphocytes. This mechanism in turn is believed to contribute to the therapeutic efficacy of glucocorticoids (GCs) in the treatment of inflammatory diseases. In this study, we reassessed the role of aSMase in GICD by using aSMase knockout mice. The absence of aSMase largely abolished the partial protection that effector memory CD4+ T cells in wild-type mice possess against GICD. Reduced IL-2 secretion by aSMase-deficient CD4+ T cells suggested that a lack of this important survival factor might be the cause of these cells' enhanced susceptibility to GICD. Indeed, addition of IL-2 restored the protection against GICD, whereas neutralization of IL-2 abrogated the otherwise protective effect seen in wild-type effector memory CD4+ T cells. The therapeutic implications of the altered sensitivity of aSMase-deficient T cells to GICD were assessed in models of inflammatory disorders; namely, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and acute graft-versus-host disease. Surprisingly, GC treatment was equally efficient in both models in terms of ameliorating the diseases, regardless of the genotype of the T cells. Thus, our data reveal a hitherto unrecognized contribution of aSMase to the sensitivity of effector memory CD4+ T cells to GICD and call into question the traditionally attributed importance of GICD of T cells to the treatment of inflammatory diseases by GCs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are widely used to treat acute relapses of multiple sclerosis (MS). In this study, we demonstrate that liposomal encapsulation augments the therapeutic potency of GCs as they ameliorate experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) to the same extent as free GC, but at strongly reduced dosage and application frequency. Importantly, this is accompanied by an altered mode of action. Unlike free GCs, which mainly target T lymphocytes during EAE therapy, liposomal GCs only marginally affect T cell apoptosis and function. In contrast, liposomal GCs efficiently repress proinflammatory macrophage functions and upregulate anti-inflammatory genes associated with the alternatively activated M2 phenotype. The GC receptor (GR) per se is indispensable for the therapeutic efficacy of liposomal GC. In contrast to free GCs, however, the individual deletion of the GR either in T cells or myeloid cells has little effect on the efficacy of liposomal GCs in the treatment of EAE. Only the combined deletion of the GR in both cellular compartments markedly compromises the therapeutic effect of liposomal GCs on disease progression. In conclusion, encapsulation of GC does not only enhance their efficacy in the treatment of EAE but also alters their target cell specificity and their mode of action compared with free GCs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]