Search

Objective To determine the prevalence of use of a range of information and communications technology (ICT) applications in general practice in London, UK. Design Cross-sectional postal questionnaire study. Participants 996 general practitioners (GPs) working in 32 primary care trusts (PCTs) in London. Main outcome measures Rates of self-reported use of paperless, paper-light and paper-based consultations in general practice, perceived barriers and facilitating factors relating to their use and current use or interest in using innovative ICT. Results Questionnaires from 520 respondents (52%) were analysed. A computer was used in clinical consultations by 95% of respondents; 34% operated paper-light consultations, and 41% paperless consultations. An electronic record was always used in 76% of consultations and paper records were never used in 19%. Paper-light and paperless consultations were conducted more frequently in larger practices and those in more affluent PCTs. Numerous barriers to the implementation of ICT were identified, including lack of time, lack of training resources and negative attitudes to computers. Personal digital assistants were used by 18% of respondents and 72% were interested in their use in the future. Conclusion We have shown that there has been a considerable increase in the rate of use of ICT in general practice in recent years, but these rates have fallen behind targets set by the NHS IT Strategy. Numerous barriers to the implementation of ICT exist, and further research is needed into means of overcoming them and on the evaluation of computer-supported consultations and other technologies in primary care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and objectives: This paper aims to improve understanding of factors that contribute to persistent ethnic disparities in patient satisfaction in England. The specific objectives are to (i) examine ethnic differences in patient satisfaction with their primary care in England; and (ii) establish factors that contribute to ethnic differences in patient satisfaction. Data and methods: The study is based on secondary analysis of recent General Practitioner Patient Survey (GPPS) datasets of 2019, 2020 and 2021. Descriptive bivariate analysis was used to examine ethnic differences in patient satisfaction across the three years. This was followed with multilevel linear regression, with General Practice (GP) at level-1 and Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) at level-2 to identify factors contributing to ethnic differences in patient satisfaction. Results: The findings show consistent negative correlations between the proportion of patients reporting good (very or fairly good) overall experience and each of the ethnic minority groups. Further examination of the distribution of patient satisfaction by ethnicity, based on combined ethnic minority groups, depicted a clear negative association between ethnic minority group and patient satisfaction at both GP and CCG levels. Multilevel regression analysis identified several service-related factors (especially ease of using GP website and being treated with care and concern) that largely explained the ethnic differences in patient satisfaction. Of all factors relating to patient characteristics considered in the analysis, none was significant after controlling for GP service-related factors. Conclusions: Ethnic minority patients in England continue to consistently report lower satisfaction with their primary health care in recent years. This is largely attributable to supply (service related) rather than demand (patient characteristics) factors. These findings have important implications for health care system policy and practice at both GP and CCG levels in England. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Medication errors are an important cause of morbidity and mortality. The pharmacist-led IT-based intervention to reduce clinically important medication errors (PINCER) intervention was shown to reduce medication errors when tested in a cluster randomised controlled trial and when implemented across one region of England. Now that it has been rolled out nationally, and to enhance findings from evaluations with staff and stakeholders, this paper is the first to report patients' perceived acceptability on the use of PINCER in primary care and proposes suggestions on how delivery of PINCER related care could be delivered in a way that is acceptable and not unnecessarily burdensome. Methods: A total of 46 participants living with long-term health conditions who had experience of medication reviews and/or monitoring were recruited through patient participant groups and social media. Semi-structured, qualitative interviews and focus groups were conducted face-to-face or via telephone. A thematic analysis was conducted and findings mapped to the constructs of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). Results: Two themes were identified and interpreted within the most relevant TFA construct: Perceptions on the purpose and components of PINCER (Affective Attitude and Intervention Coherence) and Perceived patient implications (Burden and Self-efficacy). Overall perceptions on PINCER were positive with participants showing good understanding of the components. Access to medication reviews, which PINCER related care can involve, was reported to be limited and a lack of consistency in practitioners delivering reviews was considered challenging, as was lack of communication between primary care and other health-care providers. Patients thought it would be helpful if medication reviews and prescription renewal times were synchronised. Remote medication review consultations were more convenient for some but viewed as a barrier to communication by others. It was acknowledged that some patients may be more resistant to change and more willing to accept changes initiated by general practitioners. Conclusions: Participants found the concept of PINCER acceptable; however, acceptability could be improved if awareness on the role of primary care pharmacists is raised and patient-pharmacist relationships enhanced. Being transparent with communication and delivering streamlined and consistent but flexible PINCER related care is recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In some countries, such as the Netherlands and Norway, point-of-care testing (POCT) is more widely implemented in general practice compared to countries such as England and Australia. To comprehend what is necessary to realize the benefits of POCT, regarding its integration in primary care, it would be beneficial to have an overview of the structure of healthcare operations and the transactions between stakeholders (also referred to as value networks). The aim of this paper is to identify the current value networks in place applying to POCT implementation at general practices in England, Australia, Norway and the Netherlands and to compare these networks in terms of seven previously published factors that support the successful implementation, sustainability and scale-up of innovations. Methods: The value networks were described based on formal guidelines and standards published by the respective governments, organizational bodies and affiliates. The value network of each country was validated by at least two relevant stakeholders from the respective country. Results: The analysis revealed that the biggest challenge for countries with low POCT uptake was the lack of effective communication between the several organizations involved with POCT as well as the high workload for general practitioners (GPs) aiming to implement POCT. It is observed that countries with a single national authority responsible for POCT have a better uptake as they can govern the task of POCT roll-out and management and reduce the workload for GPs by assisting with set-up, quality control, training and support. Conclusion: Setting up a single national authority may be an effective step towards realizing the full benefits of POCT. Although it is possible for day-to-day operations to fall under the responsibility of the GP, this is only feasible if support and guidance are readily available to ensure that the workload associated with POCT is limited and as low as possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose -- The purpose of this paper is to describe the approach adopted to building relationships between health and social care in Birmingham. Design/methodology/approach -- This is a practical case study, reflecting on personal experience of being directly involved in the situations and discussions described. It supplements a 2012 paper (Lotinga and Glasby, 2012) on the creation of Birmingham's Health and Well-being Board. Findings -- Local history and context is crucial in shaping the nature of local joint working initiatives -- understanding where local services have come from and why they have made the choices they have is a crucial pre-requisite for understanding current and future opportunities. Research limitations/implications -- This paper aims to place joint working between general practice and social work in a broader organisational, financial and policy setting -- and placing local developments in this wider context is crucial for understanding barriers and opportunities locally. Originality/value -- In the absence of a detailed evidence base, front-line practice is often far ahead of the current research evidence. This means that local case studies like this are crucial in terms of sharing learning with other areas of the country, with policy makers and with researchers. While many case studies of joint working are small in nature, Birmingham is the largest local authority in Europe -- so this paper also contributes learning based on trying to develop joint working in very large, complex authorities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article reports that nurses are being encouraged in September 2010 to express their views on the plans of the British government to give general practitioners the authority to commission 80 billion British pounds of health services.

The article discusses two medical research papers recognized by the Royal College of General Practitioners in London, England in 2005. One of the two studies found that patients with mental health problems value the core characteristics of general practice. The other study indicated that the choice of general practitioners to listen to the evidence base and to stop prescribing antibiotics for conjunctivitis is a challenge.

The authors reflects on a paper which explores the expertise and case-based teaching requirements in primary care and the results of the evaluation of an initiative for self-directed clinical learning across three primary care trusts in London, England. He considers the organizational perspective of clinical learning and the implications of learning initiatives for recruitment and retention of general practitioners. He also offers examples of the strategies adopted by the South London Organization of Vocational Training Schemes to consider the implications of sustaining a learning culture in a climate of organizational change.

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between general practitioners (GPs) and social care professionals by reflecting on a project (the Home Truths project) which sought to improve joint working between general practice and social care though an action-research process. Design/methodology/approach – iMPOWER's Home Truths project involved gathering local data regarding joint working in local areas and using this data as a catalyst for change. The Institute of Local Government Studies and the Health Services Management Centre at the University of Birmingham were asked to act as a critical friend to the project. This involved supporting the design of the data collection, offering advice on the process and to carrying out a short evaluation of the impact of the first wave. The paper reflects on the collected data from the sites and information from the impact evaluation. Findings – The paper highlights the poor quality of the relationship between GPs and social workers. Findings that illustrate this include GPs’ poor knowledge of social care services; a perception that social care services were of poor quality and rating the quality of their relationships with social workers as poor. However GPs felt that knowing more about social care could help prevent their patients going into residential care earlier than necessary and wanted to work more closely with social care to exploit the benefits and opportunities. The interventions that have been put in place to try and improve relationships focus on the day-to-day working lives of the professionals rather than attempting to introduce new initiatives. Research limitations/implications – The response rate from GPs in the areas was low (average response rate was 10 per cent in each area) and it may be that only those GPs who are interested in working with social care responded. The initiatives that have been developed appear to be reasonable responses to the issues identified. However, a lack of discrete outcomes through which to measure improvement will make it difficult to demonstrate the impact of the interventions. Originality/value – This paper underlines that despite many years of policy makers promoting better integration, the relationship between the key gate-keepers within the health and social care systems is still poor. The findings from the Home Truths surveys and action plans has gone some way to address the gap identified in the evidence base about the relationships between GPs and social workers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mothers often make key decisions regarding their children's health. They hold core beliefs and attitudes towards healthcare providers, relying on healthcare services to provide support, advice and reassurance. It is crucial that health providers form authentic relationships with families with young children, in order to effectively provide healthcare, support and information as needed. In this paper, we explore mothers' views on the accessibility and expertise of healthcare professionals caring for their child's health. A case study, using a geographic post code as the case boundary was used. Focus groups and semi‐structured interviews with mothers of children aged under five years old were conducted. Participants (n = 33) were recruited from local playgroups and six focus groups (19 participants) and 14 individual interviews were conducted. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. General Practice (including general practitioners [GPs] and practice nurses) was considered to be the preferred option when seeking timely healthcare advice and information. Participant mothers were open to accessing professional advice concerning their child's health, from a range of health professionals and understood the role and potential contribution of various health professionals. However, some factors, influenced mothers' decision‐making. These were captured in three themes: maternal perceptions of GPs as accessible experts; practice nurses as approachable and reassuring sources of advice; and difficulty in accessing health visiting services primarily due to service funding cuts. Further investment in primary care services, including expansion of the practice nurse role and an increase in health visiting service provision, may help to provide sufficient support for mothers seeking healthcare advice. In addition, healthcare service strategies, which engage with mothers and ensure nurses are recognised as knowledgeable, accessible, supportive and a suitable alternative to GPs, would be beneficial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) were in early development when fieldwork took place. Public Health (PH) was moving into the local authority, and new ways of working were being established. Methods Three qualitative case studies in the North of England were undertaken using three different data collection methods: observations, interviews and the collection of documents that were related to the project. Comprehensive field notes were taken during observations, analysed alongside interview transcriptions and collected documentation using the software programme Atlas.ti. Results The relationship between the CCG and their local PH team was in development at the time of data collection. Three different PH roles could be discerned from the data: 'co-owner', 'service provider' and 'critical friend'. These roles impacted on the utilization of PH by CCGs and the wider relationship between the CCG and PH. Conclusions These models are 'ideal types', and in reality the CCG-PH relationship in most areas will contain elements of all three models. However, to think of them as set out in this paper is instructive for both CCGs and PH. It is important that CCGs and their PH colleagues to think clearly about what they are trying to achieve and how that can most effectively work together. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose -- The purpose of this paper is to present a case study of one element of the integrated work which has taken place in Central Manchester, the development of multi-disciplinary Practice-Integrated Care Teams (PICT). The paper will show how working together has become a practical reality for members of these teams, and is forming the building blocks for further integration across neighbourhoods. Design/methodology/approach -- This paper draws on the author's experience of working in the PICT project from 2012 to 2014. The report will draw on the evaluation work which took place during the project, and will include reflections from others involved in the project and members of the teams. Findings -- The integrated care teams which have been developed in Central Manchester have started to make significant changes to the ways that professionals work together, to the experience that patients have and to the costs of urgent care provision. Whilst there is still a long way to go, there has been significant learning from the PICT. This includes improved patient outcomes and experience. There has been an overall reduction in secondary care activity for patients the teams have been working with, with the largest reduction being in emergency admissions. Alongside this, patient feedback has reinforced the value of this personalised approach and increased overall satisfaction with the care and advice received from health and social care professionals and an improved professional experience. Evaluation has demonstrated that amongst professionals involved in the team there is a strong commitment to the principles of integrated care and that the confidence, skills and capacity of the teams have strengthened since this way of working has been introduced. As monitoring of financial impact continues to develop, cost savings from secondary care, particularly around emergency unplanned care, are encouraging. Originality/value -- This paper draws on the recent experience of designing and delivering integrated care across a range of multi-agency, multi-professional partners. The model which has been developed centres around the role of general practice, and has enabled primary care to take a key role in the development of an out-of-hospital integrated care system. This has enabled community professionals such as nurses and social workers to build a much stronger relationship with general practice and enable system linkages which will be essential to the delivery of joined-up health and social care in the future. The project has been accompanied by thorough and ongoing evaluation to support the validity of the learnings which have been reported. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prescribing in palliative care was an ‘early candidate’ area for the extension of nurse prescribing authority, but has failed to meet expectations. The low number of nurse prescribers working in palliative care, and the impact of the lack of this kind of professional, has received little attention. This paper gives details of an ‘in-depth service evaluation project’ relating to the prescribing activity of specialist palliative care nurse independent prescribers (SPCNIPs) in one community palliative care team to ascertain the volume of their prescribing activity as well identifications of the outcomes and influences to their prescribing activity [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Visualising and analysing geographical patterns in mental illness can be a starting point for understanding and creating effective policy around inequalities and how to resolve them. The paper aims to discuss these issues.Design/methodology/approach This research note looks at geographical variations in GP drug prescribing for schizophrenia and similar psychosis using open Presentation-level Data for England downloaded from NHS Digital.Findings The authors found considerable geographical variation in both the level of prescribing per thousand population at local authority level and in the rate of change measured over five years. There is a statistically significant north-south divide in prescribing. The authors have used social marketing geodemographics to explore possible correlates with the geographical patterns. Highest positive correlations show links to deprivation and less healthy lifestyle choices.Originality/value This is the first time National maps of geographical variation of GP prescribing for schizophrenia and psychosis have been produced. Seeing this geographical variation is in itself informative and a potential eye-opener. In doing so, new questions can be asked of the data, practice and policy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accessible summary: What is known on the subject: People with dementia can experience symptoms that upset them and upset the people who care for them To cope, care homes sometimes use strong medicines called antipsychotics but these can make people with dementia become more ill We do not know just why doctors and nurses caring for people with dementia still use these strong medicines more than they need to What the paper adds to existing knowledge: Giving antipsychotics can make it easier to care for residents within busy care homes, so people tend to see and remember the benefits of antipsychotics The harm of antipsychotics is noticed less, meaning carers will use them again, in a “vicious circle” What are the implications for practice: If these medicines worked before it does not make them the right choice again It might help to show carers very clearly the harms from using these medicines, to stress the dangers Abstract: Introduction: Treating the behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia with antipsychotics can cause detrimental side‐effects but their use in care homes remains problematic with the views of professionals not fully explored. Aim/question: To develop an in‐depth explanatory model about inappropriate prescribing of antipsychotics in dementia within care homes. Methods: Twenty‐eight participants from eight different professional groups with a role in shaping treatment decisions in dementia care were recruited and interviewed. The audio‐recorded interviews were transcribed and analyzed using constructivist grounded theory. Results: When patients with dementia present with behavioural and psychological symptoms, the prescribing of antipsychotics allows the multitude of work in a care home to be managed; the effectiveness of antipsychotics is more perceptible than their side‐effects. This perceived usefulness strengthens beliefs that these medications ought to be prescribed again in future situations, generating a self‐fulfilling prophecy. Discussion: Our findings may partly explain why the launch of the national dementia strategy in England has been found not to have reduced antipsychotic prescribing in care homes. Implications for practice: Positive perceptions based on past experiences with antipsychotics should be challenged through future interventions that tackle inappropriate prescribing, for example using behaviour change techniques to better highlight adverse consequences of prescribing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Depression is the second most common chronic condition affecting women of reproductive age; 23.4% of women enter pregnancy with depression and use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in pregnancy is often necessary for maternal wellbeing. However, SSRI use during pregnancy can cause congenital malformations, postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), and persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN). In UK primary care, prescribing formularies are one medium by which prescribers are provided with local medicines advice. Aim: To review all local prescribing formularies with respect to prescribing SSRIs in women of reproductive age, during pregnancy, and during breastfeeding. Design & setting: A systematic review of prescribing formularies in England and Wales. Method: A systematic keyword search of all clinical commissioning group and Integrated Care Board websites in England and Local Health Board websites in Wales was undertaken between December 2021–22 to identify prescribing formularies. Data were extracted on prescribing guidance for SSRIs. Results: Seventy-four prescribing formularies were reviewed. Of these, 14.9% (n = 11/74) provided links to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency guidance on congenital abnormalities associated with SSRIs, 28.4% (n = 21/74) provided links to guidance on PPH risk, and 1.4% (n = 1/74) provided links to guidance on PPHN. Specific local guidance was given on SSRI prescribing for women of reproductive age, during pregnancy, and during breastfeeding in 12.2% (n = 9/74), 23.0% (n = 17/74), and 21.6% (n = 16/74) of formularies, respectively. Conclusion: Our results suggest that prescribers may be poorly informed by local formularies about the risks of SSRI use around pregnancy. This could place babies at increased risk of unintentional SSRI exposure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Social prescribing link workers are recently introduced roles in English primary care. One of their intended functions is to support patients with conditions influenced by the wider, social determinants of health. Their main purpose is to connect people to community resources to meet their nonmedical needs. However, our research reveals that link workers provide not only connections but also what we have described as "holding" for individuals with complex needs, who lack informal networks of support or who are waiting to access services. We explore the concept of holding, its meaning and significance in this context, and consider its consequences. As part of a realist evaluation, we observed seven link workers in GP practices in England during focussed ethnographies over a 3‐week period. We took field notes and interviewed 61 patients and 93 healthcare and voluntary sector professionals. Nine to twelve months later, we carried out follow‐up interviews with forty‐one patients, seven link workers, and a link worker manager. We identified four functions of holding: supporting patients waiting for services, sustaining patients as they prepare for change, reducing the emotional burden of primary healthcare professionals, and bearing witness to patients' distress. Holding appears to be a vital but often overlooked aspect of social prescribing. Patients benefit from having a reliable and consistent person to support their emotional needs. However, similar to the impact of holding on other primary care professionals, there are unintended consequences: some link workers exceed their capacity, become overburdened, experience burnout, and leave their job. Recognizing the importance of holding and understanding its role in link workers' primary care responsibilities are critical. If holding work is accepted as a role for link workers, providing training and support to them should be prioritised to ensure successful implementation and positive outcomes for patients, link workers, and primary healthcare staff. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper examines the new approaches to older bodies found within primary care, with the purpose of determining whether they represent a significant disjunction from established approaches in geriatric medicine. A genealogical review of clinical approaches to certain conditions commonly found in old age is undertaken utilising (a) key texts of pioneering British geriatricians and (b) three editions of a key textbook of general practice, published between 1989 and 2009. The discourses and practices established by the Quality and Outcome Frameworks in England are then examined, focusing on evidence-based guidance for these same conditions. Following this excavation of written texts, empirical data are analysed, namely the accounts of general practitioners and practice nurses regarding application of the technologies associated with chronic disease management to older patients. Continuities and changes identified by these practitioners are explored in terms of three specific consequences, namely conceptualising and treatment of older bodies and interaction with patients. The paper's conclusion considers whether these changes are significant enough to warrant describing them as representative of an epistemic rupture or break in the way older bodies are perceived, both in medicine and also in society more generally, and thus of constituting a new political anatomy of the older body. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Objectives: This paper examines how the interaction between financial and clinical risk at two critical phases of health care reform in England has been experienced by frontline staff caring for vulnerable patients with long term conditions. Methods: The paper draws on contracting theory and two interdisciplinary and in-depth qualitative research studies undertaken in 1995 and 2007. Methods common to both studies included documentary analysis and interviews with managers and front line professionals. The 1995 study employed action-based research and included observation of community care; the 2007 study used realistic evaluation and included engagement with service user groups. Results: In both reform processes, financial risk was increasingly devolved to frontline practitioners and smaller organizational units such as GP commissioning groups, with payment by unit of activity, aimed at changing professionals' behaviour. This financing increased perceived clinical risk and fragmented the delivery of health and social care services requiring staff efforts to improve collaboration and integration, and created some perverse incentives and staff demoralisation. Conclusions: Health services reform should only shift financial risk to frontline professionals to the extent that it can be efficiently borne. Where team work is required, contracts should reward collaborative multiprofessional activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To explore some of the key assumptions underpinning the continued development of general practitioner-led commissioning in health services. Methods:Qualitative data from two studies of service improvement in the English NHS were considered against England's plans for GP-led commissioning. These data were collected through in-depth interviews with a total of 187 professionals and 99 people affected by services in 10 different primary care trust areas across England between 2008 and 2009. Results: Internationally, GPs are seen to have a central position in health systems. In keeping with this, the English policy places emphasis on the 'pivotal role' of general practitioners, considered to be ideally placed to commission in the best interests of their patients. However, our evidence suggests that general practitioners do not always have a pivotal role for all patients. Moreover, it is planned that the new commissioning groups in England will not be subject to top-down performance management and this raises the question of how agreed quality standards will be met under the proposed new system. Conclusions: This paper questions the assumption that GPs are best placed to commission health services in a way that meets quality standards and leads to equitable outcomes. There is little evidence to suggest that GPs will succeed where others have failed and a risk that, without top-down performance management, service improvement will be patchy, leading to greater, not reduced, inequity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As a part of the national carers' strategy, the Department of Health commissioned six pilot workshops spread across England for General Practitioners (GPs) and other primary healthcare workers. The six workshops were held during September and October 2009, arranged by the Royal College of General Practitioners and planned in consultation with the Princess Royal Trust for Carers. The workshops were delivered by one of two GPs and by a carer. The Department of Health commissioned an evaluation of the workshop programme. This paper reports on the attitudes towards and knowledge of carers by GPs and other primary care workers, such as community matrons, practice nurses, healthcare assistants, practice managers and receptionists. It also tracks changes over time from the questionnaire responses pre- and post-workshop and 3 months later in the GPs' and other primary care workers' response to carers. Prior to the workshops, GPs and other primary care workers saw primary care as having a significant role in directly assisting carers, especially with emotional support and in signposting to other services. However, there was a lack of knowledge about issues facing carers, limited confidence in assisting carers and few services within the primary care teams directly focussed on carers. The workshops were regarded positively by those who attended, and the evaluation found that there was a positive impact with GPs and other primary care workers reporting specific actions they had taken post-workshop to assist carers, greater confidence and awareness in working with carers, and increased knowledge about carers. The paper concludes by recommending how the pilot programme might be rolled out more widely. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Violence against doctors provides an illuminating context for studying medicalisation and its limits in the management of deviance. The paper examines the emergence of such violence as a policy issue in England, with particular reference to general practitioners (GPs) in the National Health Service. Recent guidance exhorts doctors to exercise ‘zero tolerance’ with respect to acts of violence. The emphasis is on risk management and protecting victims rather than on resolving the perpetrators’ problems. The paper argues that this policy frame is consistent with recent claims from criminologists that there is a new ‘turn’ in penal policy, away from rehabilitation and addressing the needs of individual offenders. However, responses of individual GPs, obtained through a postal questionnaire sent to c.1000 GPs and in–depth interviews with a sub–sample, suggest that doctors are not ‘zero tolerant’ in responding to attacks. But nor are they medical imperialists seeking to include all perpetrators within their professional jurisdiction. Rather, they exercise professional discretion about behaviours which often fall into a ‘grey area’ between ‘illness’ and ‘crime’, and about individuals who are not clearly categorisable as either ‘sick’ or ‘bad’. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Studies using video-recordings of GPs' consultations have been important in investigating GPs' clinical behaviour. Unfortunately, the characteristics of participating GPs are rarely described, making it difficult to assess how representative they are or how generalizable the studies' results can be. This paper documents the recruitment of 53 GPs to a research project which involved video-recording their consultations to determine how GPs approach the topic of smoking cessation with patients.Methods: The Attitudes to Smoking Advice Questionnaire was used to select GPs with diverse attitudes towards discussing smoking with patients.Results: Out of 123 GPs who were eligible to take part, 53 (43.1%) agreed. GPs who agreed to become research subjects were younger, more likely to work in teaching or training practices and more likely to be current members of the RCGP.Conclusions: When planning studies which utilize video-recordings of GPs' consultations, researchers should give consideration to how this apparent self-selection by participating GPs could influence research results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The anticipatory prescribing of injectable controlled drugs (ICDs) by general practitioners (GPs) to care home residents is common practice and is believed to reduce emergency hospital transfers at the end-of-life. However, evidence about the process of ICD prescribing and how it affects residents' hospital transfer is limited. The study examined how care home nurses and senior carers (senior staff) describe their role in ICDs prescribing and identify that role to affect residents' hospital transfers at the end-of-life. Methods: 1,440 h of participant observation in five care homes in England between May 2019 and March 2020. Semi-structured interviews with a range of staff. Interviews (n = 25) and fieldnotes (2,761 handwritten A5 pages) were analysed thematically. Results: Senior staff request GPs to prescribe ICDs ahead of residents' expected death and review prescribed ICDs for as long as residents survive. Senior staff use this mechanism to ascertain the clinical appropriateness of withholding potentially life-extending emergency care (which usually led to hospital transfer) and demonstrate safe care provision to GPs certifying the medical cause of death. This enables senior staff to facilitate a care home death for residents experiencing uncertain dying trajectories. Conclusion: Senior staff use GPs' prescriptions and reviews of ICDs to pre-empt hospital transfers at the end-of-life. Policy should indicate a clear timeframe for ICD review to make hospital transfer avoidance less reliant on trust between senior staff and GPs. The timeframe should match the period before death allowing GPs to certify death without triggering a Coroner's referral. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Temporary doctors, known as locums, are a key component of the medical workforce in the NHS but evidence on differences in quality and safety between locum and permanent doctors is limited. We aimed to examine differences in the clinical practice, and prescribing safety for locum and permanent doctors working in primary care in England. Methods: We accessed electronic health care records (EHRs) for 3.5 million patients from the CPRD GOLD database with linkage to Hospital Episode Statistics from 1st April 2010 to 31st March 2022. We used multi-level mixed effects logistic regression to compare consultations with locum and permanent GPs for several patient outcomes including general practice revisits; prescribing of antibiotics; strong opioids; hypnotics; A&E visits; emergency hospital admissions; admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions; test ordering; referrals; and prescribing safety indicators while controlling for patient and practice characteristics. Results: Consultations with locum GPs were 22% more likely to involve a prescription for an antibiotic (OR = 1.22 (1.21 to 1.22)), 8% more likely to involve a prescription for a strong opioid (OR = 1.08 (1.06 to 1.09)), 4% more likely to be followed by an A&E visit on the same day (OR = 1.04 (1.01 to 1.08)) and 5% more likely to be followed by an A&E visit within 1 to 7 days (OR = 1.05 (1.02 to 1.08)). Consultations with a locum were 12% less likely to lead to a practice revisit within 7 days (OR = 0.88 (0.87 to 0.88)), 4% less likely to involve a prescription for a hypnotic (OR = 0.96 (0.94 to 0.98)), 15% less likely to involve a referral (OR = 0.85 (0.84 to 0.86)) and 19% less likely to involve a test (OR = 0.81 (0.80 to 0.82)). We found no evidence that emergency admissions, ACSC admissions and eight out of the eleven prescribing safety indicators were different if patients were seen by a locum or a permanent GP. Conclusions: Despite existing concerns, the clinical practice and performance of locum GPs did not appear to be systematically different from that of permanent GPs. The practice and performance of both locum and permanent GPs is likely shaped by the organisational setting and systems within which they work. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Many people living with dementia are supported at home using a variety of health and social care services. This paper reports the findings from a focus group study undertaken with staff in community mental health teams to explore areas for improvement in relation to national policies and recommendations for dementia care. Two focus groups were held with staff (n = 23) in 2011 to discuss topics including service delivery, information and communication, and provision of health and community care for people with dementia. Respondents identified problems with information sharing and incompatible electronic systems; inflexibility in home care services; and poor recognition of dementia in hospital settings. General practitioners had developed a greater awareness of the disease and some community services worked well. They felt that budgetary constraints and a focus on quality indicators impeded good dementia care. Key areas suggested by staff for improvements in dementia care included the implementation of more flexible services, dementia training for health and social care staff, and better quality care in acute hospital settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patient feedback websites or doctor rating websites are increasingly being used by patients to give feedback about their health care experiences. There is little known about why patients in England may give Web-based feedback and what may motivate or dissuade them from giving Web-based feedback.Objective: The aim of this study was to explore patients' views toward giving Web-based feedback and ratings to general practitioners (GPs), within the context of other feedback methods available in primary care in England, and in particular, paper-based feedback cards.Methods: A descriptive exploratory qualitative approach using face-to-face semistructured interviews was used in this study. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 18 participants from different age groups in London and Coventry. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using applied thematic analysis.Results: Half of the participants in this study were not aware of the opportunity to leave feedback for GPs, and there was limited awareness about the methods available to leave feedback for a GP. The majority of participants were not convinced that formal patient feedback was needed by GPs or would be used by GPs for improvement, regardless of whether they gave it via a website or on paper. Some participants said or suggested that they may leave feedback on a website rather than on a paper-based feedback card for several reasons: because of the ability and ease of giving it remotely; because it would be shared with the public; and because it would be taken more seriously by GPs. Others, however, suggested that they would not use a website to leave feedback for the opposite reasons: because of accessibility issues; privacy and security concerns; and because they felt feedback left on a website may be ignored.Conclusions: Patient feedback and rating websites as they currently are will not replace other mechanisms for patients in England to leave feedback for a GP. Rather, they may motivate a small number of patients who have more altruistic motives or wish to place collective pressure on a GP to give Web-based feedback. If the National Health Service or GP practices want more patients to leave Web-based feedback, we suggest they first make patients aware that they can leave anonymous feedback securely on a website for a GP. They can then convince them that their feedback is needed and wanted by GPs for improvement, and that the reviews they leave on the website will be of benefit to other patients to decide which GP to see or which GP practice to join. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose - As the notion of "integrated care" has received ever greater policy traction, so the idea that a named individual should take responsibility for coordinating the various elements of care for service users has also gained ground. The purpose of this paper is to look at the proposal to hand this role to GPs, examine the policy expectations and explore some of the implementation dilemmas. Design/methodology/approach - Review of policy documents and relevant literature. Findings - That the role of "care coordinator" has rarely succeeded in the past and that there are specific difficulties in expecting GPs to take on the task. Research limitations/implications - Review of existing literature linked to emergent policy - no original research. Originality/value - This is a new application of an enduring policy concept. Currently the literature is thin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used to assess impact of disease and treatment on quality of life and symptoms; however, their use in primary care is fragmented. We aimed to understand how PROMs are currently being used in primary care, the barriers and facilitators of this use and if appropriate how it might be optimised. Methods: Cross-sectional survey and semi-structured interviews among general practitioners (GPs) in England. GPs' opinions were explored using an electronic, self-completed questionnaire disseminated to 100 GPs via an online doctors' community and semi-structured qualitative interviews with 25 GPs. Results: Most GPs surveyed (77/100; 77%) reported using one or more PROM, primarily to aid clinical management (n = 66) or as screening/diagnostic tools (n = 62). Qualitative interviews highlighted challenges in identifying and selecting PROMs; however, some GPs valued PROMs for shared decision making and to direct patient discussions. The interviews identified key barriers to PROM use including: time constraints; insufficient knowledge; lack of integration into clinical systems; and PROMs being mandated without consultation or explanation. Evidence of the benefit of PROMs is required to promote uptake and use of PROMs in primary care. Conclusion: Implementation of PROMs in primary care requires integration with clinical systems, a bottom-up approach to PROM selection and system design involving meaningful consultation with patients and primary care clinicians and training/support for use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This final report of the Lancet Commission into liver disease in the UK stresses the continuing increase in burden of liver disease from excess alcohol consumption and obesity, with high levels of hospital admissions which are worsening in deprived areas. Only with comprehensive food and alcohol strategies based on fiscal and regulatory measures (including a minimum unit price for alcohol, the alcohol duty escalator, and an extension of the sugar levy on food content) can the disease burden be curtailed. Following introduction of minimum unit pricing in Scotland, alcohol sales fell by 3%, with the greatest effect on heavy drinkers of low-cost alcohol products. We also discuss the major contribution of obesity and alcohol to the ten most common cancers as well as measures outlined by the departing Chief Medical Officer to combat rising levels of obesity-the highest of any country in the west. Mortality of severely ill patients with liver disease in district general hospitals is unacceptably high, indicating the need to develop a masterplan for improving hospital care. We propose a plan based around specialist hospital centres that are linked to district general hospitals by operational delivery networks. This plan has received strong backing from the British Association for Study of the Liver and British Society of Gastroenterology, but is held up at NHS England. The value of so-called day-case care bundles to reduce high hospital readmission rates with greater care in the community is described, along with examples of locally derived schemes for the early detection of disease and, in particular, schemes to allow general practitioners to refer patients directly for elastography assessment. New funding arrangements for general practitioners will be required if these proposals are to be taken up more widely around the country. Understanding of the harm to health from lifestyle causes among the general population is low, with a poor knowledge of alcohol consumption and dietary guidelines. The Lancet Commission has serious doubts about whether the initiatives described in the Prevention Green Paper, with the onus placed on the individual based on the use of information technology and the latest in behavioural science, will be effective. We call for greater coordination between official and non-official bodies that have highlighted the unacceptable disease burden from liver disease in England in order to present a single, strong voice to the higher echelons of government. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

2013/14 saw the start of the introduction of a new live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) programme for children in England. 2018/19 saw co-circulation of both A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2), when LAIV was offered to all healthy children 2–9 years of age. LAIV effectiveness against influenza hospitalisation is not well described. This paper presents the 2018/19 end-of-season adjusted vaccine effectiveness (aVE) against laboratory confirmed influenza related hospitalisation in children aged 2–17. The test negative case control approach was used to estimate aVE by influenza A subtype and vaccine type. Cases and controls were selected from a sentinel laboratory surveillance system which collates details of individuals tested for influenza with reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on respiratory samples. Vaccine and clinical history was obtained from general practitioners of study participants. There were 307 hospitalised cases and 679 hospitalised controls. End-of-season influenza aVE was 53.0% (95% CI: 33.3, 66.8) against influenza confirmed hospitalisation; 63.5% (95% CI: 34.4, 79.7) against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 hospitalisation and 31.1% (95% CI: −53.9, 69.2) against influenza A(H3N2). LAIV aVE was 49.1% (95% CI: 25.9, 65.0) for any influenza and 70.7% (95% CI: 41.8, 85.3) for A(H1N1)pdm09, whereas for those receiving quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (QIV), aVE was 64.4% (95% CI: 29.4, 82.0) and 44.4% (95% CI: −51.9, 79.6) respectively. We provide evidence of overall significant VE for both LAIV and QIV against influenza associated hospitalisation in children 2–17 years of age, most notably against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, with non-significant protection against A(H3N2). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

2018/19 was the first season of introduction in England of a newly licensed adjuvanted influenza vaccine (aTIV) for adults 65 years or older, who were previously offered standard-dose, non-adjuvanted vaccine, achieving uptake levels >70%, often with poor effectiveness. This paper presents the end-of-season adjusted vaccine effectiveness (aVE) against laboratory confirmed influenza hospitalisation in this population. A frequency-matched test negative case control approach was used to estimate aVE by influenza A subtype and vaccine type. Cases were influenza confirmed hospitalisations and controls influenza negative hospitalisations who were 65 years or more. Cases and controls were selected from a sentinel laboratory surveillance system which collates details of inpatients and outpatients routinely tested on clinical advice for influenza infection with reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on respiratory samples. Vaccine and clinical history was obtained from the general practitioners of study participants. A total of 428 cases and 1013 controls were included in the analysis. End-of-season any-influenza aVE against hospitalisation was 53.4% (95% CI: 39.9, 63.9). By influenza A subtype, aVE was 64.8% (95% CI: 49.6, 75.3) against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and 39.3% (95% CI: 6.5, 60.6) against influenza A(H3N2). There was insufficient data to estimate influenza B VE. aVE estimates for all influenza, influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and influenza A(H3N2) for aTIV were 53.8% (39.8, 64.5); 65.9% (50.6, 76.4) and 39.5% (4.8, 61.5) respectively. We provide evidence of significant influenza VE in the elderly, most notably against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, but also against A(H3N2) for aTIV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite longstanding problems of access to general practice, attempts to understand and address the issues do not adequately include perspectives of the people providing or using care, nor do they use established theories of access to understand complexity. Aim: To understand problems of access to general practice from the multiple perspectives of service users and staff using an applied theory of access. Design and setting: A qualitative participatory case study in an area of northwest England. Method: A community-based participatory approach was used with qualitative interviews, focus groups, and observation to understand perspectives about accessing general practice. Data were collected between October 2015 and October 2016. Inductive and abductive analysis, informed by Levesque et al's theory of access, allowed the team to identify complexities and relationships between interrelated problems. Results: This study presents a paradox of problems in accessing general practice, in which the demand on general practice both creates and hides unmet need in the population. Data show how reactive rules to control demand have undermined important aspects of care, such as continuity. The layers of rules and decreased continuity create extra work for practice staff, clinicians, and patients. Complicated rules, combined with a lack of capacity to reach out or be flexible, leave many patients, including those with complex and/or unrecognised health needs, unable to navigate the system to access care. This relationship between demand and unmet need exacerbates existing health inequities. Conclusion: Understanding the paradox of access problems allows for different targets for change and different solutions to free up capacity in general practice to address the unmet need in the population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this article, the author focuses on the impact of the British National Health Service (NHS) health care guidelines restraints on clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) in England. He informs that four CCGs have implemented the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline for in vitro fertilisation and the general practitioner (GP) referral service management guideline has restricted the flow of patients in CCGs. It states that a white paper released by the NHS in 2010 has revealed that NHS has planned to abolish primary health care trusts. It also mentions that the guidelines have impacted both the budget and responsibilities of CCGs. INSETS: BOX 1: CCGS FAIL TO IMPLEMENT NICE GUIDANCE ON IVF;BOX 2: CLOSING THE GATES¿NEW REFERRAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS;COMMISSIONING GROUPS ¿ HOW THEY CAME INTO BEING;BOX 3: FAMILY DOCTOR¿PATIENTS¿ ADVOCATE OR GUARDIAN OF THE PUBLIC

Background: Addressing health inequalities remains a prominent policy objective of the current UK government, but current NHS reforms involve a significant shift in roles and responsibilities. Clinicians are now placed at the heart of healthcare commissioning through which significant inequalities in access, uptake and impact of healthcare services must be addressed. Questions arise as to whether these new arrangements will help or hinder progress on health inequalities. This paper explores the perspectives of experienced healthcare professionals working within the commissioning arena; many of whom are likely to remain key actors in this unfolding scenario. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 42 professionals involved with health and social care commissioning at national and local levels. These included representatives from the Department of Health, Primary Care Trusts, Strategic Health Authorities, Local Authorities, and third sector organisations. Results: In general, respondents lamented the lack of progress on health inequalities during the PCT commissioning era, where strong policy had not resulted in measurable improvements. However, there was concern that GP-led commissioning will fare little better, particularly in a time of reduced spending. Specific concerns centred on: reduced commitment to a health inequalities agenda; inadequate skills and loss of expertise; and weakened partnership working and engagement. There were more mixed opinions as to whether GP commissioners would be better able than their predecessors to challenge large provider trusts and shift spend towards prevention and early intervention, and whether GPs' clinical experience would support commissioning action on inequalities. Though largely pessimistic, respondents highlighted some opportunities, including the potential for greater accountability of healthcare commissioners to the public and more influential needs assessments via emergent Health & Wellbeing Boards. Conclusions: There is doubt about the ability of GP commissioners to take clearer action on health inequalities than PCTs have historically achieved. Key actors expect the contribution from commissioning to address health inequalities to become even more piecemeal in the new arrangements, as it will be dependent upon the interest and agency of particular individuals within the new commissioning groups to engage and influence a wider range of stakeholders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose – The purpose of the article is to explore the implications of GP commissioning through the lens of complexity theory. The key point that the article attempts to rise is that GP commissioning does imply greater freedom, responsibility and ability to move the English NHS in a more public oriented, locally responsive and public health oriented direction. At the same time, as demonstrated by the Stacey diagram, it forces GPs into difficult, complex situations that lie outside of their traditional skill range and experiences and implores them to deal with a much wider range of actors and institutions that they are unfamiliar with and are well beyond their control. Design/methodology/approach – This is a discussion paper that explores the recent proposals for GP commissioning from a complexity framework, and in particular the "Stacey diagram". Findings – The commissioning reforms may represent a healthy organisational transformation of the NHS and over time generate a number of positive outcomes. Nevertheless, with a complexity perspective, one can begin to understand why this reform is so challenging for GPs, and that it will take a whole new range of GP skills and decision-making strategies (and maybe even a shift in the overall GP culture) in order to make it work. Originality/value – To the author's knowledge this is the first attempt to use complexity theory to explore the strengths and weaknesses of GP commissioning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patient non-adherence to medicines represents a significant waste of health resource and lost opportunity for health gain. Medicine management services are a key health policy strategy to encourage patients to take medicines as they are prescribed. One such service is the English Medicines Use Review (MUR) which is an NHS-funded community pharmacy service involving a patient-pharmacist consultation aiming to improve patients' knowledge of medicines and their use. To date the evidence for MURs to improve patient health outcomes is equivocal and GPs are reported to be sceptical about the value of the service. This paper presents the patient's perspective of the MUR service and focuses on the importance of GP-pharmacist collaboration for patient care. Suggestions on how MURs may have value to GPs through the delivery of increased patient benefit are discussed. Method: A qualitative study involving ten weeks of ethnographic observations in two English community pharmacies. Observations were made of all pharmacy activities including patient-pharmacist MUR consultations. Subsequent interviews with these patients were conducted to explore their experience of the service. Interviews with the pharmacy staff were conducted after the period of observations. A thematic approach was used to analyse the data. Results: Fifty-four patients agreed to have their MUR observed of which thirty-four were interviewed. Seventeen pharmacy staff were also interviewed. Patients reported positive views about MURs. However, there was little evidence suggesting that pharmacists and GPs were working collaboratively or communicating outcomes resulting from MURs. MURs were conducted in isolation from other aspects of patient care. Patients considered GPs to have authority over medicines making a few wary that MURs had the potential to cause tensions between these professionals and possibly adversely affect their own relationship with their doctor. Conclusions: This study reveals the potential for effective GP-pharmacist collaboration to improve the capacity of the MUR service to support patient medicine taking. Closer collaboration between GPs and pharmacists could potentially improve patients' use of medicines and associated health care outcomes. The current lack of such collaboration constitutes a missed opportunity for pharmacists and GPs to work together with patients to improve effective prescribing and optimise patient use of medicines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hypertension is the commonest risk factor contributing to the global burden of disease. Public Health England estimates that, in England, 24% of the population are hypertensive, with 40% possibly undiagnosed. With this in mind, dentists, in particular those undertaking sedation, are in a perfect position to screen for high blood pressure and refer on for further detailed assessment. This paper outlines when a referral to the General Medical Practitioner (GP) should be considered, when sedation should be deferred and how hypertension is diagnosed and managed in primary care based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)/British Hypertension Society (BHS) guidelines. CPD/Clinical Relevance: The purpose of this article is to update General Dental Practitioners (GDPs), including those who practise IV Midazolam sedation, on how patients who present with suspected hypertension are managed by their GP. Consideration is given to what blood pressures are deemed safe to sedate and what blood pressures should be referred for further assessment, even if considered safe to sedate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Making a decision is not only one of the physician's most important responsibilities but also one of patients' most sensitive moments in medical encounters. Drawing from pragmatics studies, this paper explores rapport maintenance and/or enhancement (Spencer-Oatey 2000, 2008) in the decision-making strategies that General Practitioners (GPs) and patients employ in 80 encounters in various areas of England and Spain. The results show that such strategies are context-bound and subject to role specifications: while patients may make use of (dis)agreement strategies and initiate decisions and/or selfdiagnosis, doctors give options, show empathy, expand explanations or show explicit or implicit (dis) agreement. In relation to this, notable findings were revealed: first, these communicative strategies may vary not only in terms of frequency but also quality and distribution; second, the Spanish interlocutors in the data gathered tend to negotiate through the explicit expression of opinions, while the British interlocutors prefer the discussion of different alternatives and value the other's freedom to act. Third, there is higher tolerance of disagreement in the Spanish data. Fourth, negotiation may be undertaken on the basis of either self-affirmation or consensus-seeking beliefs. Finally, patient empowerment is displayed in divergent ways in both sets of data. In short, the decision-making processes examined are subject to social and psychological factors with a direct impact on communicative styles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Revalidation will be introduced in 2010; it will require general practitioners (GPs) to demonstrate they are fit to practise according to standards set by the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP). This will include the requirement to achieve 50 continuing professional development (CPD) credits per year. There has been no published analysis of GPs' current CPD. This paper describes a retrospective analysis of the learning logs kept by 71 practising GPs undertaking the interim Membership by Assessment of Performance (iMAP) programme, considering quantity of recorded learning, evidence of reflection on outcome and spread of content across the domains of the General Medical Council's Good Medical Practice (GMP). The average GP iMAP candidate undertook 87 hours of CPD over the year (range 21.5 hours to 293.5 hours); 16 (22.5%) undertook less than 50 hours while 22 recorded more than 100 hours. The GPs averaged five different types of CPD and 31 recorded outcomes across the year. Most GPs recorded outcomes in each domain of GMP. Those who logged more activities were also those more likely to record a wider spread of learning across the RCGP's curriculum. These results suggest that the RCGP's proposed managed CPD scheme is feasible based on the current CPD activity of this self-selected group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this paper is to investigate interprofessional collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and pharmacists involved in the delivery of enhanced pharmacy services under the local pharmaceutical services (LPS) contract in England. Previous research suggests that a number of interprofessional barriers exist between community pharmacists and GPs which hinders the integration of community pharmacists into the primary health care team (PHCT). One of the aims of the LPS contract, introduced in England in 2002 as an alternative to national contractual arrangements, was to enable pharmacists to work more closely with other health care professionals. A two-stage survey was distributed to all pharmacists involved in the first wave of LPS and in-depth interviews undertaken with pharmacists and GPs at six of the LPS sites. Overall the level to which the LPS pharmacists felt integrated into the PHCT did not substantially increase with the introduction of LPS, although co-location was reported to have facilitated integration. New relationships were formed with GPs and existing ones strengthened. A good existing working relationship with GPs was found to be an important factor in the successful operation of the pilots as many were dependent on GPs for patient referrals. The findings suggest that establishing interprofessional collaboration between GPs and pharmacists is a piecemeal process, with a reliance on goodwill and trust-based relationships. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the Kent Surrey Sussex (KSS) Deanery we have run four different Foundation programme pilots. This paper describes the East Kent F2 pilot from a general practice perspective and highlights the importance of establishing locality sensitive, multi-professional learning communities to support F2 doctors and their 'teachers'. We utilise experience from GP vocational training schemes (VTS) and trainer groups to support the F2 doctors and teachers and work across geographic and professional boundaries. In acknowledging the tension between educational reform and service delivery we establish a model of three days a week in clinical general practice over a four-month rotation. For the future we look to supporting colleagues in 'non-training' practices in their development as clinical supervisors as part of a wider educational network in primary care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is a growing body of literature highlighting inequities in GP practice prescribing rates for a number of drug therapies. The small amount of research on statin prescribing has either focussed on variations rather than equity per se, been based on populations other than GP practices or has used cost-based prescribing rates. Aim: To explore the equity of GP practice prescribing rates for statins, using the theoretical framework of equity of treatment (also known as horizontal equity or comparative need). Methods: The study involved a cross-sectional secondary analysis in four primary care trusts (PCTs 1-4) in the North West of England, including 132 GP practices. Prescribing rates and health care needs indicators (HCNIs) were developed for all GP practices. Results: Scatter-plots revealed large differences between individual GP practices, both within and between PCTs, in terms of the relationship between statin prescribing and healthcare need. In addition, there were large differences between GP practices in terms of the relationship between actual and expected prescribing rates for statins. Multiple regression analyses explained almost 30% of the variation in prescribing rates in the combined dataset, 25% in PCT1, 31% in PCT3, 51% in PC4 and 58% in PCT2. There were positive associations with variables relating to CHD hospital diagnoses and procedures and negative associations with variables relating to ethnicity, material deprivation, the proportion of patients aged over 75 years and single-handed GP practices. Conclusion: Overall, this study found inequitable relationships between actual and expected prescribing rates, and possible inequities in statin prescribing rates on the basis of ethnicity, deprivation, single-handed practices and the proportion of patients aged over 75 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper reports the views of 56 general practice registrars (GPRs) holding innovative posts in Yorkshire Deanery in November 2004. A questionnaire survey identified high levels of satisfaction with innovative posts, whether based on identified educational needs documented in a personal educational plan, or pre-existing structured posts developed to be relevant training for any GPR. Although perceived to be less onerous in workload, these posts were identified as more relevant to a career in general practice and more relevant to GPRs' educational needs. The main concerns related to the increased difficulty of becoming part of at least two teams and the need for careful timetabling if working between a number of sites, to facilitate both work and contact with supervisors. Despite the limitations in depth of this study, we believe it provides evidence that more innovative posts should be developed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Relatively little is understood concerning the exact role of general practice in the cancer patients’ pre-diagnostic, and post-diagnostic journey. This paper aims to explore this role using data from the National Survey of NHS Patients – Cancer. Data from 65 192 patients relating to five questions from this survey were analysed in detail with particular relevance to differences between the six cancers [breast, colorectal, lung, ovarian, prostate and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL)], and socio-demographic variables (age, gender and social class). There were considerable differences between patients with the six cancers, and the role of general practice in the cancer diagnosis, and post-diagnosis management. The vast majority of patients saw their general practitioner (GP) with symptoms prior to being seen in hospital. A significant minority were told their diagnosis by their GP. About half the sample were told to contact their GP post-discharge, and about half did so. Being told to contact the GP post-discharge was strongly associated with actually seeing the GP. Most patients felt that their GP was given enough information about their treatment or condition. In conclusion, this work has quantified the central role of general practice in cancer diagnosis and management in England. There remain considerable resource, educational and research needs to continue to provide high-quality cancer care in primary care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Focus: The paper focuses on public health practitioners who collectively represent one of three key workforce groups identified by England's Chief Medical Officer as critical to the successful delivery of national public health policy priorities. Question: We report on two areas of work which attempt to address the following two-part question: in developing the public health practitioner workforce in England, what is needed, and how do we do it? Approach: First, we describe a five-component conceptual framework for developing the public health workforce which is grounded in data derived from a national Open Space event hosted by the University of the West of England in March 2005. The five components are (i) strategic support and oversight; (ii) national technical and professional support; (iii) national career building; (iv) Local organisational development, and (v) sub-regional skills development. Key elements of each component are described in the paper. Second, we describe in some detail a new multidisciplinary skills development programme which illustrates one of the framework components (sub-regional skills development). The programme, established in January 2005, is aimed at three key groups of public health practitioners: health visitors (specialist community public health nurse), school nurses and environmental health officers. Its main features and some initial evaluation findings are presented. Conclusions: To be effective, activities aimed at supporting the development of the public health practitioner workforce should, where possible, aim to be congruent with core public health principles of self-determination and collective responsibility. We also conclude that Leadership and vision at a national level, combined with local implementation of evidence-based training programme such as the one described could help to achieve much greater and more rapid progress in skilling up the existing public health practitioner workforce than has been possible up to now. But we note that this requires sustained investment, robust sector-wide delivery frameworks, and a group of committed local public health champions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present paper explores general practitioners’ (GPs’) perspectives on the difficulties which they face when discussing sexual health issues with lesbian and gay patients in primary care consultations. It draws upon data obtained from a qualitative interview study with 22 GPs aged between 34 and 57 years who were practising in Sheffield, UK. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and the data were analysed thematically. The results indicate that (non-hetero)sexual orientation could form a barrier to talking about sexual health matters for almost half of this GP sample. Difficulties related primarily to ignorance of lesbian and gay lifestyles and sexual practices, and also included concerns about the appropriate language to use and assumptions about the nature of gay men's relationships. Homophobic attitudes were also identified in a minority of the sample. Participants suggested improvements around improving communication about sexual health with lesbian and gay patients. These included training at undergraduate and postgraduate levels, taking a proactive role during consultations, not making assumptions about patients’ sexual orientation and having a non-discriminatory policy for their practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper presents an overview of the findings of a recent interview-based research project that examined the educational experiences of trainers who have been part of the Wessex four-month general practice pre-registration house officer (GP-PRHO) placement scheme. The objectives of the research project were to: • gain better insight into the educational needs and experiences of GP-PRHOs from the perspective of the trainers • explore how trainers meet the needs of this group of learners • uncover barriers to participation experienced by Wessex trainers. The data revealed the strategies used to manage PRHO learning in general practice, how PRHOs developed and changed over the four months, and the three 'barriers' to participation encountered by trainers, all of which are discussed in the context of previous research. INSETS: Box 1 Summary of the educational strategies and tools used...;Box 2 Summary of the major landmarks identified by the trainers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Personal development plans (PDPs) are a relatively new tool within the field of general practice training, but have rapidly gained credence, in part due to a ‘new climate’ of lifelong learning and regular appraisal within primary care. Kent, Surrey and Sussex (KSS) GP Deanery has run a senior general practice registrar (SGPR) scheme since August 2001. It has required registrars to complete a PDP as part of their application process and has encouraged course members to view their PDPs as a formative aid throughout their six-month post and as a tool for self-assessment at the end. This paper attempts to explore the senior registrars' experience of using their PDPs, comparing the views of those currently in post with those of previous senior registrars. This data is supported by, and contrasted with, data supplied by previous senior registrars in the form of their end of scheme reports. Analysis of this data reveals whether or not the extensive use of PDPs within the scheme is justified (according to adult-learning principles) and whether recommendations for future development can be made. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]