Search

A single‐row crossflow heat exchanger with concentric and eccentric circular fins is designed and shown in this paper using a constructal design approach. The transverse fins spacing, the spanwise fins spacing, and the fin‐tube eccentricity are varied inside a fixed volume. In addition to the concentric case (ε = 0), two tube‐fin eccentricities are considered with (ε = ±0.25). The (heat transfer/volume) heat density is to be optimized with respect to the transverse and the spanwise spacing. The height and the width of the heat exchanger occupation space in addition to the fin diameter are fixed as design constraints. The crossflow is motivated by constant pressure drop with two dimensionless pressure drop numbers (Bejan number) (Be = 103 and 105). Both the fins and the tubes are maintained at a constant temperature, and they are cooled by the cross air of ambient temperature. The ratio of the fin to tube diameter is kept at 0.5. Three‐dimensional equations for conservation of mass, conservation of momentum, and conservation of energy are solved using finite volume method for incompressible and steady flows. The heat density for concentric fins (ε = 0) and eccentric fins (ε = ±0.25) is maximized two times, one with respect to transverse spacing, and the other with respect to spanwise spacing at Bejan numbers (Be = 103 and 105). The highest double‐maximized heat density is attained at the fin eccentricity (ε = 0.25). The increase in the double maximized heat density when the fin eccentricity (ε = 0.25) is 7.65% for Be = 103, and it is 12% for Be = 105. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The maximization of volumetric heat transfer density from radially finned tubes in cross‐flow is investigated in this study based on the constructal design method. A row of radially finned tubes is placed in cross‐air flow. The tubes and the radial fins are heated at uniform temperatures and cooled by the air cross‐flow. The cross‐air flow is generated by a finite pressure difference. Two dimensionless pressure differences (Bejan number) are considered (Be = 103 and Be = 105). The objective function, the degrees of freedom, and the constraints in the constructal design method should be identified. The objective function is the maximization of the heat transfer density from the finned tubes. The degrees of freedom are; the fin tip‐to‐fin tip spacing, the number of fins, the tube diameter, the fin thickness, and the angle between the fins. The constraints are the length and height of the space occupied by the finned tubes. The pressure‐driven flow and energy equations (steady, two‐dimensional, and incompressible) are solved by means of the finite volume method. The ranges of the dimensionless fin tip‐to‐fin tip spacing are (0.2 ≤ S ≤ 1 for Be = 103 and 0.05≤ S ≤ 0.3 for Be = 105). The number of fins is changed as (N = 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12). The dimensionless tube diameter is changed as (D = 0.25, 0.5, and 0.75). The dimensionless fin thickness is changed as (T = 0.001, 0.01, and 0.05). The results showed that for both (Be = 103) and (Be = 105), the highest value of the maximum volumetric heat transfer density is for (N = 2) and decreases as the number of fins increases. In addition, the minimum values of the maximum volumetric heat transfer density occur when the vertical fins exist at (N = 4, 8, and 12). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The density of heat transfer rate from a vertical array of flat tubes in cross flow is maximized under fixed pressure drop using constructal design. With the constructal design, the tube arrangement is found such that the heat currents from the tubes to the coolant flow easily. The constraint in the present constructal design is the volume where the tubes are arranged inside it. The two degrees of freedom available inside the volume are the tube‐to‐tube spacing and the length of the flat part of the tubes (tube flatness). The tubes are heated with constant surface temperature. The equations of continuity, momentums, and energy for steady, two‐dimensional, and laminar forced convection are solved by means of a finite‐volume method. The ranges of the present study are Bejan number (dimensionless pressure drop) (103 ≤ Be ≤ 105) and tube flatness (dimensionless length of the tube flat part) (0 ≤ F ≤ 0.8). The coolant used is air with Prandtl number (Pr = 0.72). The results reveal that the maximum heat transfer density decreases when the tube flatness decreases at constant Bejan number. At constant tube flatness, the heat transfer density increases as the dimensionless pressure drop (Bejan number) increases. Also, the optimal tube‐to‐tube spacing is constant, irrespective of the tube flatness at constant Bejan number. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The heat transfer density rate from a row of rhombic tubes cooled by forced convection is maximized based on constructal design. A row of parallel rhombic tubes are placed in a fixed volume, the horizontal axis of the tubes is kept constant while the vertical axis of the tubes and the spacing between the tubes are changed to facilitate the heat flow from the tubes to the coolant. The tubes are kept at constant temperature and the incoming free‐stream flow is induced by constant pressure drop. For steady, two‐dimensional, incompressible, and laminar forced convection, the governing equations are solved numerically by finite volume method with SIMPLE algorithm. The dimensionless pressure drop (Bejan number, Be) ranging from 10 3 to 10 5, the range of the vertical axis of the tube is 0.2 ≤ B ≤ 2, and the working fluid is air (Pr = 0.71). The results show that the optimal spacing decreases and the maximum heat transfer density increases as the Bejan number increases for all vertical axes of the tube. Bejan number and the bluntness of the tube have a significant effect of the flow structure (separation and vortex formation) around the tubes at the optimal spacings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]