Search

Objective: To examine the choices of women with both high-risk and low-risk pregnancies who are undergoing prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in a clinical setting regarding three challenging types of findings: variants of uncertain clinical significance, susceptibility loci for neurodevelopmental disorders, and copy number variants associated with risks for adult-onset conditions. We assessed whether women's choices were associated with indications for testing or with one-on-one pretest genetic counseling.Methods: In this cross-sectional study, medical records of women who underwent invasive prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis testing (N=1,070) at Hadassah Medical Center between June 2017 and February 2018 were examined for testing indications, choices regarding chromosomal microarray analysis findings, and type of pretest genetic counseling. Multivariable analyses to assess associations with testing indication and prior genetic counseling were carried out using logistic regression models.Results: In total, 56% of women (n=593) chose to be informed of all three types of findings and 20% (n=218) chose not to be informed of any of the findings beyond high-penetrance childhood-onset pathogenic findings. Variants of uncertain clinical significance as a single choice was the least-selected finding (2.5%, n=27). Low-risk pregnancies (ie, those with normal biochemical screening and fetal ultrasound examinations) were associated with increased interest in receiving genetic information about adult-onset conditions (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.7; 95% CI 1.18-2.33) and susceptibility loci (aOR 1.5; 95% CI 1.08-2.10).Conclusion: Women with both high-risk and low-risk pregnancies were generally more likely to choose to receive additional genetic information, albeit differences in preferences depend on testing indication and type of pretest counseling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To examine the risk for clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) among fetuses with apparently isolated horseshoe kidney.Methods: Data from all CMA analyses performed due to isolated horseshoe kidney reported to the Israeli Ministry of Health between January 2013 and September 2016 were retrospectively obtained from a computerized database. Risk estimation was performed comparing the rate of abnormal CMA findings to the general population, based on a systematic review encompassing 9272 pregnancies with normal ultrasound, and local data cohort of 5541 pregnancies undergoing CMA due to maternal request.Results: Of 82 pregnancies with isolated horseshoe kidney, one loss-of-copy-number variant compatible with 16p13.11 microdeletion syndrome was demonstrated (1.2%). In addition, two variants of unknown significance (VOUS) were detected (2.4%). The relative risk for pathogenic CMA findings among pregnancies with isolated single horseshoe kidney was not significantly different from the control population (1.03-1.39%).Discussion: To our best knowledge, our study is the first report describing the rate of clinically significant CMA findings in fetuses with isolated horseshoe kidney. The detection of one pathogenic CMA findings in our cohort implies that the value of CMA analysis in such pregnancies is similar to the general population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]