Search

Aim: To estimate the rate of unexpected brain abnormalities detected by in utero magnetic resonance imaging (iuMRI) in fetuses without abnormalities at ultrasonography (USS).Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study of pregnant women whose fetus had no structural brain (or body) abnormalities recognised on antenatal ultrasonography. Women were recruited from 12 centres across the UK and underwent iuMRI at 18 gestational weeks or more in the [blinded for review]. The imaging studies were reviewed by an experienced neuroradiologist. The positive and negative predictive values of both USS and iuMRI have been calculated by combining the results of this study with the results from the main [blinded for review] study.Results: One hundred and ninety-eight pregnant women were recruited and underwent iuMRI of 205 fetuses. Brain abnormalities were shown on iuMRI in two fetuses that were not recognised on USS (one case of a focal cortical abnormality and one case of mild ventriculomegaly). The negative predictive value for USS was 99.5% and 100% for iuMRI.Conclusions: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study comparing USS and iuMRI in low-risk pregnancies. USS has a comparatively high rule-out for fetal brain abnormalities and should remain the screening tool of choice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ultrasound is routinely used as a prenatal screening and diagnostic tool but has limitations. Some anomalies in the developing fetal brain can be difficult to detect, and in utero magnetic resonance imaging (iuMRI) is increasingly used as an adjunct to ultrasound. However, understandings of patient perspectives of iuMRI technology are still developing. Our qualitative study of 41 mothers who experienced iuMRI was embedded in a diagnostic accuracy trial and aimed to inform policy recommendations that might stem from the clinical findings. Our analysis suggests that iuMRI is seen as useful, offering valuable additional information and helping women make decisions about care options at a difficult time. However, patients’ experiences demonstrated the uncertainty and anxiety associated with the prenatal diagnosis (PND) process relating to brain anomalies including the challenges of their embodied contributions. Our findings suggest more could be done to reduce the impact on pregnant women during an already difficult, anxious period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To determine the level of patient knowledge regarding the 20-week screening ultrasound examination, which is performed on over 95% of women in our unit, and to ascertain whether the use of targeted education could improve patient knowledge and expectations, to determine from where patients obtained information on the scan and to ascertain whether patients felt they had chosen to undergo the scan. Methods An anonymous questionnaire was issued to all patients attending for their 20-week scan over a 3-week period in July 2002 (n = 220). There were nine questions, focusing on maternal choice, information and knowledge. As a result of the information obtained, we undertook a program of education for hospital and community medical and midwifery staff. A printed information sheet given to the patients at the time of booking their 20-week scan was introduced. We then issued the questionnaire for another 3-week period in July 2003 (n = 171). Results As a result of our education program, there was a significant increase in the number of women answering various knowledge-based questions correctly about the 20-week scan, in those using the written information provided as a source of information (P < 0.0001), and in those who felt they had been involved in the decision to have the scan (P = 0.003). Conclusions Patients need to be better informed about the 20-week scan, and choose whether or not to have it. Health professionals are pivotal in this process. While written information helps to reinforce the information given, alone it has only a small effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]