Search

There is growing recognition of the importance of food quality over quantity for aquatic consumers. In streams and rivers, most previous studies considered this primarily in terms of the quality of terrestrial leaf litter and importance of microbial conditioning. However, many recent studies suggest that algae are a more nutritional food source for riverine consumers than leaf litter. To date, few studies have quantified longitudinal shifts in the nutritional quality of basal food resources in river ecosystems and how these may affect consumers.We conducted a field investigation in a subalpine river ecosystem in Austria to investigate longitudinal variations in diet quality of basal food sources (submerged leaves and periphyton) and diet source dependence of stream consumers (invertebrate grazers, shredders, filterers and predators, and fish). Fatty acid (FA) profiles of basal food sources and their consumers were measured.Our results indicate systematic differences between the FA profiles of terrestrial leaves and aquatic biota, that is periphyton, invertebrates and fish. Submerged leaves contained very low proportions of long‐chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC‐PUFAs), which were conversely rich in aquatic biota. While the FA composition of submerged leaves remained similar among sites, the LC‐PUFAs of periphyton increased longitudinally, which was associated with increasing nutrients from upstream to downstream.Longitudinal variations in periphyton LC‐PUFAs were reflected in the LC‐PUFAs of invertebrate grazers and shredders, and further tracked by invertebrate predators and fish. However, brown trout Salmo trutta contained a large proportion of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6ω3), a LC‐PUFA almost entirely missing in basal sources and invertebrates. The fish accumulated eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 20:5ω3) from invertebrate prey and may use this FA to synthesize DHA.Our results provide a nutritional perspective for river food web studies, emphasizing the importance of algal resources to consumer somatic growth and the need to account for the longitudinal shifts in the quality of these basal resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Algae are generally a high‐quality diet source because they provide essential compounds to aquatic consumers. In forested stream ecosystems, the availability of high‐quality algae is low compared to terrestrial organic matter, which may constrain the dietary transfer of essential compounds to consumers. However, there could be other overlooked high‐quality resource pools that provide essential compounds to consumers in river ecosystems.We conducted a field study along a subalpine river continuum in Austria to identify the nutritional role of a 'hidden' food resource for aquatic consumers; the biofilms growing on the underside of rocks (dark biofilms). Dark and light (i.e. upper surface of rocks) biofilms and invertebrates were collected, and their fatty acid (FA) composition was analysed.Compared with light biofilms, dark biofilms contained greater proportions of bacterial FA, long‐chain saturated FA (biomarkers of terrestrial plants) and oleic acid (18:1ω9; a fungal biomarker), but a lower proportion of algal FA, especially omega‐3 polyunsaturated FA (ω3 PUFA). The ω3 PUFA composition in dark biofilms was strongly correlated with that in light biofilms. Furthermore, the overall FA profiles of dark biofilms were significantly associated with invertebrate FA profiles. Strong correlations were also observed between invertebrates and dark biofilms for bacterial FA and the ω3 PUFA eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 20:5ω3).Synthesis. This field study demonstrates that dark biofilms are a high‐quality resource pool for invertebrates in river ecosystems that is often overlooked. Similar to light biofilms, dark biofilms provide physiologically important FA and bacterial FA for stream invertebrates. However, these high‐quality resources are threatened by increasing human disturbances to river ecosystems. Future research is required to better understand how the quality of both dark and light biofilms changes in response to human disturbance, and how this affects dietary energy transfer to upper trophic consumers, including fish and humans. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]