Search

Background: Many recommendations regarding peritonitis prevention in international consensus guidelines are opinion-based rather than evidence-based. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion technique, timing of gastrostomy placement, and use of prophylactic antibiotics prior to dental, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary procedures on the risk of peritonitis in pediatric patients on PD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients on maintenance PD using data from the SCOPE collaborative from 2011 to 2022. Data pertaining to laparoscopic PD catheter insertion (vs. open), gastrostomy placement after PD catheter insertion (vs. before/concurrent), and no prophylactic antibiotics (vs. yes) were obtained. Multivariable generalized linear mixed modeling was used to assess the relationship between each exposure and occurrence of peritonitis. Results: There was no significant association between PD catheter insertion technique and development of peritonitis (aOR = 2.50, 95% CI 0.64–9.80, p = 0.19). Patients who had a gastrostomy placed after PD catheter insertion had higher rates of peritonitis, but the difference was not statistically significant (aOR = 3.19, 95% CI 0.90–11.28, p = 0.07). Most patients received prophylactic antibiotics prior to procedures, but there was no significant association between prophylactic antibiotic use and peritonitis (aOR = 1.74, 95% CI 0.23–13.11, p = 0.59). Conclusions: PD catheter insertion technique does not appear to have a significant impact on peritonitis risk. Timing of gastrostomy placement may have some impact on peritonitis risk. Further study must be done to clarify the effect of prophylactic antibiotics on peritonitis risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) is a mainstay of therapy for management of severe acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill pediatric patients. There is limited data on the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) after discharge in this population. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of all pediatric patients ages 0–17 years who received CKRT from 2013 to 2017. The study excluded patients with pre-existing CKD, those who died prior to discharge, and those who had insufficient follow-up data. Patients were followed after hospital discharge and electronic health record data was collected and analyzed to assess for incidence of and risk factors for kidney sequelae. Results: A total of 42 patients were followed at a median time of 27 months (IQR 17.2, 39.8). Of these, 26.2% had evidence of CKD and 19% were at risk for CKD. Lower eGFR at hospital discharge was associated with increased odds of kidney sequelae (aOR 0.985; 95% CI 0.972, 0.996). Ages 0– < 1 and 12–17 were not significantly different (aOR 0.235, 95% CI 0.024, 1.718) and had the highest incidence of kidney sequelae (50% and 77%, respectively). Ages 1–5 and 6–11 had a decreased odds of kidney sequelae compared to the 12–17 year age group (aOR 0.098; 95% CI 0.009, 0.703 and aOR 0.035; 95% CI 0.001, 0.39, respectively). Only 54.8% of patients (n = 23) were seen in the nephrology clinic after discharge. Conclusions: Patients who receive CKRT for AKI have a significant risk of CKD, while follow-up with a pediatric nephrologist in these high-risk patients is sub-optimal. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]