Search

Background/Objectives: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a non-invasive prenatal test used to screen for common trisomies (target cfDNA) that can be expanded to assess all autosomal chromosomes (genome-wide cfDNA). As cfDNA testing gains popularity, it is crucial to examine the factors influencing the decision-making process of pregnant individuals when choosing between these two approaches. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 190 individuals undergoing cfDNA testing for aneuploidy screening, according to the current screening protocol, were allowed to make their own choice between target and genome-wide cfDNA testing. They were asked to complete a first survey at 11–13 weeks, designed to explore their characteristics, preferences, and satisfaction with the prenatal genetic counseling session, as well as a Decisional Conflict Scale. A postnatal survey was administered three months after delivery, including the Decisional Regret Scale and two open questions. Results: 84% of participants opted for genome-wide cfDNA. However, 17% found the decision challenging, and 14% felt that the results might increase anxiety. No significant differences in participant characteristics were found when comparing decisions between genome-wide and target cfDNA. However, significant differences were observed regarding ethnicity (p = <0.001), educational level (p = 0.029), previous cfDNA experience (p = 0.004), and having sufficient information when comparing termination options (p = 0.002). After delivery, only 4% would have changed their decision. Conclusions: Individuals, regardless of their characteristics, prefer genome-wide cfDNA; however, the complexity of the results necessitates enhanced genetic education for prenatal care clinicians. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To evaluate the clinical significance of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for detecting fetal sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) in Korean pregnant women. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed NIPT data from 9,176 women with singleton pregnancies referred to the CHA Biotech genome diagnostics center. Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) was extracted from maternal peripheral blood, and high-throughput massively parallel sequencing was conducted. Subsequently, the positive NIPT results for SCA were validated via karyotype and chromosomal microarray analyses. Results: Overall, 46 cases were SCA positive after NIPT, including 20, 12, 8, and 6 for Turner, triple X, Klinefelter, and Jacob syndromes, respectively. Among 37 women with invasive prenatal diagnosis, 19 had true positive NIPT results. The overall positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPT for detecting SCAs was 51.35%. The PPV was 18.75% for Turner, 88.89% for triple X, 71.43% for Klinefelter, and 60.00% for Jacob's syndromes. NIPT accuracy for detecting sex chromosome trisomies was higher than that for sex chromosome monosomy (P = 0.002). No significant correlation was observed between fetal SCA incidence and maternal age (P = 0.914), except for the borderline significance of Jacob's syndrome (P = 0.048). No significant differences were observed when comparing NIPT and karyotyping validation for fetal SCA according to pregnancy characteristics. Conclusion: Our data suggest that NIPT can reliably screen for SCAs, and it performed better in predicting sex chromosome trisomies compared with monosomy X. No correlation was observed between maternal age and fetal SCA incidence, and no association was observed between different pregnancy characteristics. The accuracy of these findings requires improvements; however, our study provides an important reference for clinical genetic counseling and further management. Larger scale studies, considering confounding factors, are required for accurate evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To explore reasons for the failure of noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT) for cell‐free fetal DNA (cffDNA) in maternal peripheral blood, and discuss appropriate treatment schemes after the failure of the test. Methods: Altogether 41,136 pregnant women participated in NIPT. Blood samples were taken again from pregnant women who failed the first blood collection upon their informed consent. Prenatal genetic counseling or prenatal diagnosis was recommended for pregnant women with final NIPT failure. Results: The first failure rate of NIPT was 0.737% (303/41136), and the reason for the failure was the low ratio of cffDNA in 135 (44.6%) of the 303 pregnant women. After the second or third blood sampling, the final failure rate was 0.182% (75/41136). The low ratio of cffDNA was the main reason for test failure in 42 (56.0%) of the 75 pregnant women who finally failed NIPT, among whom 44 (58.7%) had underlying diseases, including 21 (47.7%) with more than two coexisting underlying diseases. Only 27 (36.0%) of the 75 pregnant women with NIPT failure underwent interventional prenatal diagnosis. Conclusions: The main reason for NIPT failure was the low ratio of cffDNA. Postponing the gestational weeks of blood collection may improve the success rate. Resampling and retesting upon informed consent in pregnant women who failed the first test could improve the success rate. For pregnant women who finally failed NIPT, it is suggested strengthening the genetic counseling, prenatal examination, and ultrasound evaluation, and carry out interventional prenatal diagnosis if necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping has been provided to nonimmunized RhD‐negative pregnant women to guide anti‐D prophylaxis. Among the Chinese, more than 30% of the RhD‐negative phenotype is associated with variant RHD alleles, which would limit the accuracy of fetal RHD status prediction; thus, more targeting and proper programs need to be developed. Study Design and Methods: Fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction PCR (qPCR) or Sanger sequencing on all RHD exons was used to detect maternal RHD genotypes. For pregnant women with RHD*01N.01 or RHD*01N.03 alleles, the presence of RHD exons 5 and 10 in cell‐free DNA was determined by qPCR. For pregnant women with the RHD(1227G>A) allele, high‐throughput sequencing on exon 9 of the RHD gene and RHCE gene was used to predict fetal RhD phenotype. Results: Among 65 cases of Chinese pregnant women with the serologic RhD‐negative phenotype, three major genotypes were identified: RHD*01N.01/RHD*01N.01 (61.5%), RHD*01N.01/RHD(1227G>A) or RHD*01N.03/RHD(1227G>A) (20%), and RHD*01N.01/RHD*01N.03 (13.8%), along with three cases of minor genotypes (4.6%). For 43 pregnant women with the RHD*01N.01 or RHD*01N.03 alleles, qPCR on maternal cell‐free DNA yielded a 98.5% (42/43) accuracy rate and 100% successful prediction rate. High‐throughput sequencing was successfully used to predict fetal RhD phenotypes for 13 pregnant women with RHD(1227G>A). Conclusion: On the basis of maternal RHD genotyping, fetal genotyping through qPCR or high‐throughput sequencing can improve the accuracy and success rate of prenatal fetal RhD phenotype prediction among Chinese pregnant women. It plays a potential role in guiding anti‐D prophylaxis and pregnancy management in Chinese pregnant women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This paper evaluated the clinical utility of massively parallel sequencing-based non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for detecting trisomy 21 (T21), T18, T13, sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCA), and rare chromosome aneuploidies (RCA) among the data collected by a clinical laboratory in southern China. Methods: In a 3-year period between January 2017 and December 2019, over 40,000 pregnant women underwent NIPT clinical screening test for fetal T21, T18, T13, SCA, and RCA in our laboratory. NIPT samples were processed using the NextSeq CN500 platform. The positive results were confirmed by karyotyping, and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) or copy number variants (CNV) sequencing. Details of the pregnancy outcomes were collected via telephone interview. Results: NIPT results were available for 41,819 cases; 691 positive cases were reported. The overall sensitivity for detection of T21, T18, T13, SCA, and RCA was 99.21, 100.00, 100.00, 98.55, and 100.00%, and the specificity was 99.95, 99.94, 99.98, 99.69, and 99.92%, respectively. The positive predictive values (PPVs) for detection of T21, T18, T13, SCA, and RCA were 85.62, 45.24, 40.00, 34.17, and 13.51%, respectively, and those for detection of 45,X, 47,XXY, 47,XXX, 47,XYY, and 46,XY(delX) 20.00, 59.18, 28.95, 61.54, and 25.00%, respectively. Regarding pregnancy outcomes, 92.38% of the pregnancies with confirmed aneuploidies were terminated, and 91.20% of those identified as having a false-positive result were carried to term. Among 252 unconfirmed cases, 24.60% of the pregnancies were terminated and 38.10% carried to term, while 37.30% declined interview. Conclusions: NIPT is widely used to screen fetal aneuploidies based on its high sensitivity and specificity. However, in this study, the PPVs of NIPT in terms of detecting T18, T13, XO, XXX and RCA were < 50%. In addition, more than one-third of NIPT-positive women did not accept invasive prenatal diagnosis. Confirmatory diagnosis is strongly recommended for women with positive NIPT outcomes before any further decision is made. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Liquid biopsy using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has gained global interest as a molecular diagnostic tool. However, the analysis of cfDNA in cancer patients and pregnant women has been focused on short DNA molecules (e.g., ≤ 600 bp). With the detection of long cfDNA in the plasma of pregnant women and cancer patients in two recent studies, a new avenue of long cfDNA-based liquid biopsy has been opened. In this review, we summarize our current knowledge in this nascent field of long cfDNA analysis, focusing on the fragmentomic and epigenetic features of long cfDNA. In particular, long-read sequencing enabled single-molecule methylation analysis and subsequent determination of the tissue-of-origin of long cfDNA, which has promising clinical potential in prenatal and cancer testing. We also examine some of the limitations that may hinder the immediate clinical applications of long cfDNA analysis and the current efforts involved in addressing them. With concerted efforts in this area, it is hoped that long cfDNA analysis will add to the expanding armamentarium of liquid biopsy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We developed and validated a next generation sequencing-(NGS) based NIPT assay using quantitative counting template (QCT) technology to detect RhD, C, c, E, K (Kell), and Fya (Duffy) fetal antigen genotypes from maternal blood samples in the ethnically diverse U.S. population. Quantitative counting template (QCT) technology is utilized to enable quantification and detection of paternally derived fetal antigen alleles in cell-free DNA with high sensitivity and specificity. In an analytical validation, fetal antigen status was determined for 1061 preclinical samples with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 99–100%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI 99–100%). Independent analysis of two duplicate plasma samples was conducted for 1683 clinical samples, demonstrating precision of 99.9%. Importantly, in clinical practice the no-results rate was 0% for 711 RhD-negative non-alloimmunized pregnant people and 0.1% for 769 alloimmunized pregnancies. In a clinical validation, NIPT results were 100% concordant with corresponding neonatal antigen genotype/serology for 23 RhD-negative pregnant individuals and 93 antigen evaluations in 30 alloimmunized pregnancies. Overall, this NGS-based fetal antigen NIPT assay had high performance that was comparable to invasive diagnostic assays in a validation study of a diverse U.S. population as early as 10 weeks of gestation, without the need for a sample from the biological partner. These results suggest that NGS-based fetal antigen NIPT may identify more fetuses at risk for hemolytic disease than current clinical practice, which relies on paternal genotyping and invasive diagnostics and therefore is limited by adherence rates and incorrect results due to non-paternity. Clinical adoption of NIPT for the detection of fetal antigens for both alloimmunized and RhD-negative non-alloimmunized pregnant individuals may streamline care and reduce unnecessary treatment, monitoring, and patient anxiety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In pregnant women at risk of autosomal recessive (AR) disorders, prenatal diagnosis of AR disorders primarily involves invasive procedures, such as chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis. Methods: We collected blood samples from four pregnant women in their first trimester who presented a risk of having a child with an AR disorder. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was extracted, amplified, and double-purified to reduce maternal DNA interference. Additionally, whole-genome amplification was performed for traces of residual purified cfDNA for utilization in subsequent applications. Results: Based on our findings, we detected the fetal status with the family corresponding different genes, i.e., LZTR1, DVL2, HBB, RNASEH2B, and MYO7A, as homozygous affected, wild-type, and heterozygous carriers, respectively. Results were subsequently confirmed by prenatal amniocentesis. The results of AmpFLSTR™ Identifiler™ presented a distinct profile from the corresponding mother profile, thereby corroborating the result reflecting the genetic material of the fetus. Conclusion: Herein, we detected AR disease mutations in the first trimester of pregnancy while surmounting limitations associated with maternal genetic material interference. Importantly, such detection strategies would allow the screening of pregnant women for common AR diseases, especially in highly consanguineous marriage populations. This technique would open avenues for the early detection and prevention of recessive diseases among the population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Noninvasive prenatal testing by cell-free DNA analysis is offered to pregnant women worldwide to screen for fetal aneuploidies. In noninvasive prenatal testing, the fetal fraction of cell-free DNA in the maternal circulation is measured as a quality control parameter. Given that fetal cell-free DNA originates from the placenta, the fetal fraction might also reflect placental health and maternal pregnancy adaptation. This study aimed to assess the association between the fetal fraction and adverse pregnancy outcomes. We performed a retrospective cohort study of women with singleton pregnancies opting for noninvasive prenatal testing between June 2018 and June 2019 within the Dutch nationwide implementation study (Trial by Dutch Laboratories for Evaluation of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing [TRIDENT]-2). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess associations between fetal fraction and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Fetal fraction was assessed as a continuous variable and as <10th percentile, corresponding to a fetal fraction <2.5%. The cohort comprised 56,110 pregnancies. In the analysis of fetal fraction as a continuous variable, a decrease in fetal fraction was associated with increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio, 2.27 [95% confidence interval, 1.89–2.78]), small for gestational age neonates <10th percentile (adjusted odds ratio, 1.37 [1.28–1.45]) and <2.3rd percentile (adjusted odds ratio, 2.63 [1.96–3.57]), and spontaneous preterm birth from 24 to 37 weeks of gestation (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02 [1.01–1.03]). No association was found for fetal congenital anomalies (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02 [1.00–1.04]), stillbirth (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02 [0.96–1.08]), or neonatal death (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02 [0.96–1.08]). Similar associations were found for adverse pregnancy outcomes when fetal fraction was <10th percentile. In early pregnancy, a low fetal fraction is associated with increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. These findings can be used to expand the potential of noninvasive prenatal testing in the future, enabling the prediction of pregnancy complications and facilitating tailored pregnancy management through intensified monitoring or preventive measures. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study explored the degree to which pregnant women in Korea made informed choices regarding noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and investigated factors influencing whether they made informed choices. Methods: In total, 129 pregnant women in Korea participated in a web-based survey. Multidimensional measures of informed choice regarding NIPT and decisional conflict were used to measure participants' levels of knowledge, attitudes, deliberation, uptake, and decisional conflict related to NIPT. Additional questions were asked about participants' NIPT experiences and opinions. Results: All 129 pregnant women were recruited from an online community. Excluding those who expressed neutral attitudes toward NIPT, according to the definition of informed choice used in this study, only 91 made an informed choice (n=63, 69.2%) or an uninformed choice (n=28, 30.8%). Of the latter, 75.0% had insufficient knowledge, 39.3% made a value-inconsistent decision, and 14.3% did not deliberate sufficiently. No difference in decisional conflict was found between the two groups. A significant difference was found between the two groups in the reasons why NIPT was introduced or recommended (p=.021). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that pregnant women who were knowledgeable (odds ratio [OR], 4.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.17-- 10.47) and deliberated (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.57--0.98) were significantly more likely to make an informed choice. Conclusion: The results of this study help healthcare providers, including nurses in maternity units, understand pregnant women's experiences of NIPT. Counseling strategies are needed to improve pregnant women's knowledge of NIPT and create an environment that promotes deliberation regarding this decision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

α-Thalassemia is a common inherited blood disorder manifested mainly by the deletions of α-globin genes. In geographical areas with high carrier frequencies, screening of α-thalassemia carrier state is therefore of vital importance. This study presents a novel method for identifying female carriers of common α-thalassemia deletions using samples routinely taken for non-invasive prenatal tests for screening of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies. A total of 68,885 Vietnamese pregnant women were recruited and α-thalassemia statuses were determined by gap-PCR, revealing 5344 women (7.76%) carried deletions including αα/−−SEA (4.066%), αα/−α3.7 (2.934%), αα/−α4.2 (0.656%), and rare genotypes (0.102%). A two-stage model was built to predict these α-thalassemia deletions from targeted sequencing of the HBA gene cluster on maternal cfDNA. Our method achieved F1-scores of 97.14–99.55% for detecting the three common genotypes and 94.74% for detecting rare genotypes (−α3.7/−α4.2, αα/−−THAI, −α3.7/−−SEA, −α4.2/−−SEA). Additionally, the positive predictive values were 100.00% for αα/αα, 99.29% for αα/−−SEA, 94.87% for αα/−α3.7, and 96.51% for αα/−α4.2; and the negative predictive values were 97.63%, 99.99%, 99.99%, and 100.00%, respectively. As NIPT is increasingly adopted for pregnant women, utilizing cfDNA from NIPT to detect maternal carriers of common α-thalassemia deletions will be cost-effective and expand the benefits of NIPT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Down syndrome (DS), also known as trisomy 21 (T21), is the most common genetic disorder associated with intellectual disability. There are two methods commonly used for prenatal testing of DS: serum screening (SS) for biomarkers in maternal serum and noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidy by cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal plasma. However, cost-effectiveness analyses of these two methods are mostly based on data derived from simulations with various models, with theoretical values calculated. In this study, we statistically analyzed clinical DS screening data and pregnancy outcomes during the follow-up of pregnant women in Zhuhai City, China. The economics of the two mainstream prenatal DS screening methods was evaluated from a public health perspective. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on the data of 17,363 pregnant women who received SS and NIPT during gestation in Zhuhai from 2018 to 2019, and a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed with four screening strategies. In strategy I, all pregnant women received SS, and those with T21 risk ≥1/270 had invasive prenatal diagnosis (IPD). In strategy II, all pregnant women received SS, those with T21 risk ≥ 1/270 had IPD, and those with 1/270 > T21 risk ≥ 1/1,000 had NIPT; then, women at high risk based on NIPT also had IPD. In strategy III, all pregnant women received SS, and those with T21 risk ≥1,000 had NIPT; then, women at high risk based on NIPT results had IPD. In strategy IV, all pregnant women received NIPT and those at high risk based on NIPT results had IPD. Finally, to assess the cost and effectiveness of DS screening, the total costs were calculated as the sum of screening and diagnosis as well as the direct and indirect economic burden during the average life cycle of DS patients. Results: A total of 22 of the 17,363 (1/789) pregnant women had DS, of which only one woman was over 35 years of age. SS detected 1,024 cases at high risk of T21 (≥1/270), 8 cases were true positive, with a positive predictive value of 0.78% and a detection rate of 36.4%. NIPT detected 27 cases at high risk of T21 (Z ≥ 3) and 22 cases of DS, with a positive predictive value of 81.5% and a detection rate of 100%. Strategy I had the largest total cost of 65.54 million CNY, strategy II and III had similar total costs of 40 million CNY, and strategy IV had the lowest total cost of 14.91 million CNY. By comparison, the screening strategy with NIPT alone had the highest health economic value for DS. Conclusions: SS was greatly affected by nuchal translucency and the accuracy of gestational age measured by ultrasonography. Unstandardized ultrasonography was an important reason for the low DS detection rate with SS. The influence of interfering factors on NIPT was much lower than in SS. NIPT can be used as an alternative to SS and as a primary screening strategy of prenatal DS screening for secondary prevention and control of birth defects. NIPT greatly decreased the frequency of IPD and the miscarriages associated with IPD, saved the limited medical and health resources, and greatly increased DS detection rate. Therefore, NIPT has great social and economic benefits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A majority of non-invasive prenatal screening studies determining fetal RhD status have been tested on Caucasian and Asian populations, but limited or no studies have been conducted on the Ethiopian population. In the current study, we carried non-invasive prenatal screening of fetal RHD genotype in selected RhD negative Ethiopian pregnant women. Methods: Cell-free DNA was extracted from the plasma samples of 117 RhD pregnant women between 9 and 38 weeks of gestation. Fetal RHD genotypes were detected by targeting exons 5, 7 and 10 of the RHD gene by using real-time PCR assay. RHD genotypic results were confirmed by neonatal cord blood serology. Results: Fetal RHD genotyping was conclusive in all 117 subjects. RHD genotype was correctly predicted in 115 of 117 cases, thus the test yielded 98.3% accuracy (95%CI: 97.3–99.1%). Among 115 cases, 105 were genotyped as RHD positive and 12 were genotyped as RHD negative. The sensitivity and specificity of the test were 99.1% (95% CI: 94.8–99.9%) and 91.7% (95%CI: 61.5–99.7%) respectively. The negative and positive predictive values were 99.9% (95%CI: 99.2–99.9%) and 54.0% (95% CI: 15.2–88.4%) respectively. SRY genotyping results were in complete concordance with fetal sex. Conclusion: Multi exon targeted non-invasive prenatal screening test for fetal RhD determination exhibited high accuracy and sensitivity. A confirmatory study with a bigger size of study subjects is warranted before enabling clinical implementation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Résumé: La procédure du dépistage du risque de trisomie 21 est complexe : une succession de tests pouvant aboutir à une amniocentèse est proposée. Le soignant doit donner une information claire et objective aux femmes enceintes, aux couples. Ce dépistage n'est pas obligatoire. Les modalités pour les groupes à risque de trisomie 21 ont été modifiées fin 2018 avec l'introduction du test ADN libre circulant de la trisomie 21 (test ADNlcT21). Un document d'information sur le dépistage combiné de la trisomie 21 avait été élaboré en 2014, en respectant certains critères de la méthodologie de la Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS). Une actualisation de ce document était nécessaire. Les modifications des seuils définissant les groupes à risque, et l'introduction du test ADNlcT21 ont été intégrées au document d'information. Il a été soumis à des groupes de travail composés de soignants et d'usagers. La lisibilité, la compréhension, l'objectivité des informations ont été discutées au sein de chaque groupe et les modifications proposées étaient validées successivement. Le document final a été repris par un graphiste pour en améliorer la présentation. Le document d'information actualisé peut servir de support au dialogue entre le soignant et la femme enceinte, entre le soignant et le couple et permettre aux futurs parents de discuter et décider de s'engager ou non dans le processus de dépistage. Ce document devra faire l'objet d'une évaluation. The procedure for screening risks of Down syndrome is complex : a series of tests that may lead to amniocentesis is offered. The caregiver must provide clear and objective information to pregnant women and/or couples. This screening is not mandatory. The modalities for groups at risk for Down syndrome changed at the end of 2018 with the introduction of the cell-free DNA test for Down syndrome (T21 cf-DNA test). A background document on combined screening for Down syndrome was developed in 2014 following some of the criteria in the methodology from the French High Health Authority (Haute Autorité de Santé – HAS). This document has been updated with changes to the thresholds identifying the groups at risk, and the introduction of the T21 cf-DNA test. Working groups composed of health users and professionals were set up. The readability, clarity and objectivity of the information were discussed within each group, after which proposed changes were validated. The final document was adapted by a graphic designer to improve its presentation. The updated document can be used as a supporting tool in the conversation between the caregiver and the pregnant woman and/or couple and allow future parents to discuss and decide whether to enter the screening process. This document will need to be assessed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The existence of maternal malignancy may cause false-positive results or failed tests of NIPT. Though recent studies have shown multiple chromosomal aneuploidies (MCA) are associated with malignancy, there is still no effective solution to identify maternal cancer patients from pregnant women with MCA results using NIPT. We aimed to develop a new method to effectively detect maternal cancer in pregnant women with MCA results using NIPT and a random forest classifier to identify the tissue origin of common maternal cancer types. Methods: For examination, 496 participants with MCA results via NIPT were enrolled from January 2016 to June 2019 at BGI. Cancer and non-cancer participants were confirmed through the clinical follow-up. The cohort comprising 42 maternal cancer cases and 294 non-cancer cases enrolled from January 2016 to December 2017 was utilized to develop a method named mean of the top five chromosome z scores (MTOP5Zscores). The remaining 160 participants enrolled from January 2018 to June 2019 were used to validate the performance of MTOP5Zscores. We established a random forest model to classify three common cancer types using normalized Pearson correlation coefficient (NPCC) values, z scores of 22 chromosomes, and seven plasma tumor markers (PTMs) as predictor variables. Results: 62 maternal cancer cases were confirmed with breast cancer, liver cancer, and lymphoma, the most common cancer types. MTOP5Zscores showed a sensitivity of 85% (95% confidence interval (CI), 62.11–96.79%) and specificity of 80% (95% CI, 72.41–88.28%) in the detection of maternal cancer among pregnant women with MCA results. The sensitivity of the classifier was 93.33, 66.67, and 50%, while specificity was 66.67, 90, and 97.06%, and positive predictive value (PPV) was 60.87, 72.73, and 80% for the prediction of breast cancer, liver cancer, and lymphoma, respectively. Conclusion: This study presents a solution to identify maternal cancer patients from pregnant women with MCA results using NIPT, indicating it as a value-added application of NIPT in the detection of maternal malignancies in addition to screening for fetal aneuploidies with no extra cost. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although the non-invasive prenatal test has very high sensitivity and specificity as a screening test, few false positive and false negative results have been reported. Since it is performed in the early weeks of pregnancy, this test reduces the need for invasive testing, and its prevalence and scope are gradually increasing. However, the fact that this test can be performed outside of medical reasons causes important ethical problems and controversy. Consultancy and informed consent are very important for the optimum non-invasive prenatal test offered to pregnant women. Ethical issues such as avoiding harm, equality, inclusiveness, autonomy and free choice of the pregnant woman and her partner should be addressed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The presence of an unbalanced familial translocation can be reliably assessed in the cytotrophoblast of chorionic villi. However, carriers of a balanced translocation often decline invasive testing. This study aimed to investigate whether an unbalanced translocation can also be diagnosed in cell free DNA by whole‐genome non‐invasive prenatal screening (NIPS). Material and methods: Pregnant women carrying a fetus with an unbalanced familial translocation, for whom NIPS as well as microarray data were available, were included in this retrospective assessment. NIPS was performed in the course of the TRIDENT study. Results: In 12 cases, both NIPS and microarray data were available. In 10 of 12 cases the unbalanced translocation was correctly identified by NIPS without prior knowledge on parental translocation. One was missed because the fetal fraction was too low. One was missed because of technical restrictions in calling 16p gains. Conclusions: This study supports the hypothesis that routine NIPS may be used for prenatal diagnosis of unbalanced inheritance of familial translocations, especially with prior knowledge of the translocation allowing focused examination of the involved chromosomal regions. Our study showed that routine shallow sequencing designed for aneuploidy detection in cell free DNA may be sufficient for higher resolution NIPS, if specialized copy number software is used and if sufficient fetal fraction is present. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Our aim was to provide a theoretical basis for clinicians to conduct genetic counseling and choose further prenatal diagnosis methods for pregnant women who failed non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS). Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on pregnant women who had failed NIPS tests. Results: Among the 123,291 samples, 394 pregnant women did not obtain valid results due to test failures. A total of 378 pregnant women were available for follow-up, while 16 patients were lost to follow-up. Of these 378, 135 pregnant women chose further prenatal diagnosis through amniocentesis, and one case of dysplasia was recalled for postpartum chromosome testing. The incidence rate of congenital chromosomal abnormalities in those who failed the NIPS was 3.97% (15/378), which was higher than that of the chromosomal abnormalities in the common population (1.8%). Among the pregnant women who received prenatal diagnosis, the positive rates of chromosomal abnormalities in the chromosomal microarray analysis/copy number variation sequencing (CMA/CNV-seq) group and in the karyotyping group were 15.28 and 4.76%, respectively. Conclusion: Prenatal diagnosis should be strongly recommended in posttest genetic counseling for pregnant women with NIPS failures. Further, high-resolution detection methods should be recommended for additional prenatal diagnoses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aims of the study were to assess the false-positive and uninformative test rate with first trimester cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening for common trisomies and microdeletion 22q11.2 (22q11.2DS) and to examine women's attitudes toward such an approach.Methods: This is a prospective study at the Prenatal Medicine Department of the University of Tübingen, Germany, at 11-13 weeks. In all pregnancies, a detailed ultrasound examination was carried out, followed by a cfDNA analysis for common trisomies and 22q11.2DS. In cases where the cfDNA analysis indicated 22q11.2DS, invasive prenatal diagnostic testing and parental testing were performed. After delivery, a detailed neonatal clinical examination was carried out including further genetic testing. Prior to counselling about the study, we asked the pregnant women who were potentially eligible for the study to anonymously report on their knowledge about 22q11.2DS.Results: A total of 1,127 pregnancies were included in the final analysis of the study. The first cfDNA test was uninformative in 15 (1.33%) pregnancies. In 10 (0.89%) cases, the test remained uninformative, even after the second blood sample. There were 3 (0.27%) cases with a positive cfDNA test for 22q11.2DS. In all, 983 women returned the anonymous questionnaire prior to study participation. Only 80 (8.1%) women responded that they felt familiar or very familiar with 22q11.2DS.Conclusion: The addition of 22q11.2DS in first trimester cfDNA screening for common trisomies is feasible. The uninformative test rate for common trisomies and 22q11.2DS is 0.9%, and the false-positive rate for 22q11.2DS is 0.3%. Awareness and education around 22q11.2DS should be improved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To perform individual record linkage of women undergoing screening with cell-free DNA (cfDNA), combined first-trimester screening (CFTS), second-trimester serum screening (STSS), and/or prenatal and postnatal cytogenetic testing with the aim to (1) obtain population-based estimates of utilization of prenatal screening and invasive diagnosis, (2) analyze the performance of different prenatal screening strategies, and (3) report the residual risk of any major chromosomal abnormality following a low-risk aneuploidy screening result.Methods: This was a retrospective study of women residing in the state of Victoria, Australia, who underwent prenatal screening or invasive prenatal diagnosis in 2015. Patient-funded cfDNA referrals from multiple providers were merged with state-wide results for government-subsidized CFTS, STSS and invasive diagnostic procedures. Postnatal cytogenetic results from products of conception and infants up to 12 months of age were obtained to ascertain cases of false-negative screening results and atypical chromosomal abnormalities. Individual record linkage was performed using LinkageWizTM .Results: During the study period, there were 79 140 births and 66 166 (83.6%) women underwent at least one form of aneuploidy screening. Linkage data were complete for 93.5% (n = 61 877) of women who underwent screening, and of these, 73.2% (n = 45 275) had CFTS alone, 20.2% (n = 12 486) had cfDNA alone; 5.3% (n = 3268) had STSS alone, 1.3% (n = 813) had both CFTS and cfDNA, and < 0.1% (n = 35) had both STSS and cfDNA. CFTS had a combined sensitivity for trisomies 21 (T21), 18 (T18) and 13 (T13) of 89.57% (95% CI, 82.64-93.93%) for a screen-positive rate (SPR) of 2.94%. There were 12 false-negative results in the CFTS pathway, comprising 10 cases of T21, one of T18 and one of T13. cfDNA had a combined sensitivity for T21, T18 and T13 of 100% (95% CI, 95.00-100%) for a SPR of 1.21%. When high-risk cfDNA results for any chromosome (including the sex chromosomes) and failed cfDNA tests were treated as screen positives, the SPR for cfDNA increased to 2.42%. The risk of any major chromosomal abnormality (including atypical abnormalities) detected on prenatal or postnatal diagnostic testing after a low-risk screening result was 1 in 1188 for CFTS (n = 37) and 1 in 762 for cfDNA (n = 16) (P = 0.13). The range of chromosomal abnormalities detected after a low-risk cfDNA result included pathogenic copy-number variants (n = 6), triploidy (n = 3), rare autosomal trisomies (n = 3) and monosomy X (n = 2).Conclusions: Our state-wide record-linkage analysis delineated the utilization and clinical performance of the multitude of prenatal screening pathways available to pregnant women. The sensitivity of cfDNA for T21, T18 and T13 was clearly superior to that of CFTS. While there was no statistically significant difference in the residual risk of any major chromosomal abnormality after a low-risk CFTS or cfDNA result, there were fewer live infants diagnosed with a major chromosomal abnormality in the cfDNA cohort. These data provide valuable population-based evidence to inform practice recommendations and health policies. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common genetic haematological disorder. The availability of non‐invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) is predicted to increase uptake of prenatal diagnosis for SCD, as it has no perceived procedure‐related miscarriage risk. We report the development of a targeted massively parallel sequencing (MPS) assay for the NIPD of fetal SCD using fetal cell‐free (cf)DNA from maternal plasma, with no requirement for paternal or proband samples. In all, 64 plasma samples from pregnant women were analysed: 42 from SCD carriers, 15 from women with homozygous (Hb SS) SCD and seven from women with compound heterozygous (Hb SC) SCD. Our assay incorporated a relative mutation dosage assay for maternal carriers and a wild type allele detection assay for affected women (Hb SS/Hb SC). Selective analysis of only smaller cfDNA fragments and modifications to DNA fragment hybridisation capture improved diagnostic accuracy. Clinical sensitivity was 100% and clinical specificity was 100%. One sample with a fetal fraction of <4% was correctly called as 'unaffected', but with a discordant genotype (Hb AA rather than Hb AS). Six samples gave inconclusive results, of which two had a fetal fraction of <4%. This study demonstrates that NIPD for SCD is approaching clinical utility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The introduction of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is the newest option for aneuploidy screening during pregnancy. Compared with other aneuploidy screening options, NIPS offers a higher detection rate for trisomy 21 with a low false-positive rate. However, pretest and post-test patient counseling is essential and should include a discussion of the benefits and limitations, the screening rather than diagnostic nature of the test, and the association of a test failure with an increased risk of aneuploidy. Refer patients for genetic counseling when appropriate, particularly if test failure occurs due to a low fetal fraction or if maternal mosaicism or malignancy is suspected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the knowledge and opinions of US obstetric providers who use noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) to understand current utilization and guide future best practices.Methods: A questionnaire was designed to assess the level of knowledge and attitudes of OBGYNs toward screening options for aneuploidy, with a focus on NIPT. Initial questions evaluated obstetrician demographics, practice type, and NIPT familiarity. Subsequent questions were designed to solicit current practices regarding aneuploidy screening as well as opinions, experiences, and implications of NIPT.Results: Survey respondents identified NIPT as clinically superior to traditional screening methods and indicated that they would like ACOG to formally recommend NIPT for any pregnant woman. Insurance coverage, and therefore cost, was noted as the biggest barrier, and over 81% of surveyed providers would utilize NIPT as a first-line screening test if patients' insurance offered full coverage. The majority of providers who have implemented NIPT into clinical practice indicated improved patient care. While most providers demonstrated accurate understanding of the technology and its application, nearly 15% misunderstood NIPT as being a diagnostic test for fetal aneuploidy.Conclusion: The results of the survey suggest that there is a desire for changes to current practice guidelines and insurance coverage. Additionally, provider education remains paramount. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine the effect of shipping blood in Streck blood collection tubes (BCT) prior to processing on cell-free DNA (cf-DNA) levels. Methods: Blood was collected in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and BCT tubes from 10 pregnant women carrying male fetuses. One set of each tube for each subject was processed to plasma immediately (standard cf-DNA protocol), whereas the other set was shipped by air courier and then processed. DNA was extracted and total and fetal DNA concentrations were measured by TaqMan multiplexed quantitative real-time PCR. Results: No significant difference was observed in total cf-DNA in plasma between immediately processed EDTA (control) and immediately processed BCT samples. Moreover, no significant change in total cf-DNA was detected in plasma of BCT samples shipped at room temperature. Significant differences in total cf-DNA leading to a significantly decreased fetal fraction were found in shipped EDTA samples and BCT samples shipped at 4°C. Discussion: BCT tubes are suitable for shipping whole blood prior to processing with respect to cf-DNA levels. However, care should be taken to ensure that samples are not exposed to extreme temperatures during shipment. This finding will benefit the development and clinical application of noninvasive methods of fetal diagnosis that utilize cf-DNA. Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Key Clinical Message Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is becoming increasingly popular with some offering it as a primary screen option in all patients in place of serum screening. Serum screening offers insight into placental function, which NIPT does not. Abnormal levels of analytes in the serum screen have been associated with pregnancy complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Detection of copy number variants as an integral part of noninvasive prenatal testing is increasingly used in clinical practice worldwide. We performed validation on plasma samples from 34 pregnant women with known aberrations using cell-free DNA sequencing to evaluate the sensitivity for copy number variants (CNV) detection using an in-house CNV fraction-based detection algorithm. The sensitivity for CNVs smaller than 3 megabases (Mb), larger than 3Mb, and overall was 78.57%, 100%, and 90.6%, respectively. Regarding the fetal fraction, detection sensitivity in the group with a fetal fraction of less than 10% was 57.14%, whereas there was 100% sensitivity in the group with fetal fraction exceeding 10%. The assay is also capable of indicating whether the origin of an aberration is exclusively fetal or fetomaternal/maternal. This validation demonstrated that a CNV fraction-based algorithm was applicable and feasible in clinical settings as a supplement to testing for common trisomies 21, 18, and 13. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been widely adopted for the detection of fetal aneuploidies and microdeletion syndromes, nevertheless, limited clinical utilization has been reported for the non-invasive prenatal screening of monogenic diseases. In this study, we present the development and validation of a single comprehensive NIPT for prenatal screening of chromosomal aneuploidies, microdeletions and 50 autosomal recessive disorders associated with severe or moderate clinical phenotype. Results: We employed a targeted capture enrichment technology powered by custom TArget Capture Sequences (TACS) and multi-engine bioinformatics analysis pipeline to develop and validate a novel NIPT test. This test was validated using 2033 cell-fee DNA (cfDNA) samples from maternal plasma of pregnant women referred for NIPT and paternal genomic DNA. Additionally, 200 amniotic fluid and CVS samples were used for validation purposes. All NIPT samples were correctly classified exhibiting 100% sensitivity (CI 89.7–100%) and 100% specificity (CI 99.8–100%) for chromosomal aneuploidies and microdeletions. Furthermore, 613 targeted causative mutations, of which 87 were unique, corresponding to 21 monogenic diseases, were identified. For the validation of the assay for prenatal diagnosis purposes, all aneuploidies, microdeletions and point mutations were correctly detected in all 200 amniotic fluid and CVS samples. Conclusions: We present a NIPT for aneuploidies, microdeletions, and monogenic disorders. To our knowledge this is the first time that such a comprehensive NIPT is available for clinical implementation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sequencing cell-free DNA in maternal plasma is an effective noninvasive prenatal testing technique that has been used in fetal aneuploidy screening worldwide. However, its clinical application is limited by the low fetal fraction (<4%) of cell-free DNA in many singleton pregnancies, which usually results in screen failures or no calls. In addition, dizygotic twin contributions of cell-free DNA into the maternal circulation can vary by 2-fold, complicating the quantitative diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy.Objective: We performed semiconductor sequencing of shorter fragments (107-145 bp) of circulating cell-free DNA to improve the fetal DNA fraction at lower uniquely mapped reads (1-8.5 MB) to reduce the probability of no calls.Study Design: We identified 2903 plasma samples from pregnant women, including 86 dizygotic twin pregnancy, that were collected at a single prenatal diagnostic center between October 2015 and July 2018. Size-selection noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy was applied to 2817 plasma samples (1409 male and 1408 female fetuses) and 86 dizygotic twins using noninvasive prenatal testing with and without size selection. Shorter fragment size was the key factor affecting fetal fraction in multivariable linear regression models as well as to validate the accuracy of the size selection for noninvasive prenatal testing.Results: Analysis of 1409 male fetuses by multivariable linear regression showed that maternal age, body mass index, number of pregnancies, average cell-free DNA size, maternal plasma cell-free DNA concentration, library concentration, and multiple gestation were negatively correlated with fetal fraction. Conversely, gestational age and uniquely mapped reads were positively correlated with fetal fraction. Compared with ≤120 bp cell-free DNA fragments, mean fetal fraction differences were -3.57% (95% confidence interval, -5.95% to -1.19%), for 121-130 bp, -9.52% (95% confidence interval, -11.89% to -7.14%) for 131-140 bp, and -14.47% (95% confidence interval, -18.37% to -10.58%) for ≥141 bp (Ptrend < .0001). These results were statistically significant after multivariable adjustments in models for fetal fraction. Meanwhile, results from 86 dizygotic twins showed that the size selection increased the fetal fraction by ∼3.2-fold, with 98.8% of samples reaching a fetal fraction >10%. Improved detection accuracy was also achieved.Conclusion: Sequencing shorter cell-free DNA fragments is a reasonable strategy to reduce the probability of no calls results because of low fetal fraction and should be recommended to pregnant subjects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Expanding noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) to include the detection of fetal subchromosomal copy number variations (CNVs) significantly decreased the sensitivity and specificity. Developing analytic pipeline to achieve high performance in the noninvasive detection of CNVs will largely contribute to the application of CNVs screening in clinical practice. Methods: We developed the Noninvasively Prenatal Subchromosomal Copy number variation Detection (NIPSCCD) method based on low‐pass whole‐genome sequencing, and evaluated its efficacy in detecting fetal CNVs and chromosomal aneuploidies with 20,003 pregnant women. Results: Totally, NIPSCCD identified 36 CNVs, including 29 CNVs consistent and 7 CNVs inconsistent with amniocytes tests. Additionally, seven fetal CNVs identified by amniocytes testing were undetected by NIPSCCD. The sensitivities for detecting CNVs > 10 Mb, 5 Mb–10 Mb, and CNVs < 5 Mb were 91.67%, 100.00%, and 68.42%, respectively. Moreover, NIPSCCD identified 103/ true positive trisomy 21/18/13 cases and 21 false positives, producing an overall 100.00% sensitivity and 99.89% specificity. Conclusion: NIPSCCD showed a good performance in detecting fetal subchromosomal CNVs, especially for CNVs >10 Mb, and can be incorporated into the routine NIPT chromosomal aneuploidies screening with high sensitivity and specificity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]