Search

Aims: Information on breastfeeding and safety of biologics in infants is lacking due to difficulties in case collection. We evaluated methods for determining the concentration of biologics in breast milk using a dry filter method that can simplify the collection, storage and transport of breast milk. Methods: To generate dried filter paper (DFP) samples, approximately 30 μL of breast milk was placed onto a Whatman 903 card and punched out. After extraction, the supernatant was measured using an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. Three concentrations of each drug were prepared in liquid breast milk (LBM) and DFP samples to determine their stability up to 28 days after storage at 2–8°C or −20°C for LBM and 25 ± 5°C for DFP. LBM and DFP samples were also provided by nursing mothers using biologics during lactation, and drug concentrations in both samples were compared. The agreement between the two measurement methods was confirmed by Bland–Altman analysis. Results: Breast milk was provided by 12 mothers who used biologics (tocilizumab, abatacept, etanercept, golimumab, sarilumab and belimumab). The coefficients of variation for within‐run and between‐run precision for the six drugs were within 15% for both LBM and DFP, and accuracy was within 90%–110% of the quality controls. After 28 days, concentrations remained at more than 90%. The difference between the values obtained by each method was within the acceptable range of error (−12.1 to +16.6 ng/mL). Conclusions: A method for determining the concentration of biologics using DFP is expected to help improve pharmacotherapy for lactating women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) may be concerned about medication safety during preconception, pregnancy, and lactation, and they should be closely followed up to ensure that UC activity is controlled during the perinatal period. Reported information on the safety of ustekinumab during pregnancy and lactation is limited. In this case report, we examined the safety of ustekinumab in a fetus and breastfed infant with reference to drug concentrations in maternal serum, cord blood, breast milk, and infant serum. Case presentation: A 36-year-old female who developed hematochezia and was diagnosed with ulcerative colitis at age 24 was pregnant with her first child. During pregnancy she was treated with subcutaneous bimonthly ustekinumab, at a dose of 90 mg, until 29 weeks of gestation. Her ulcerative colitis symptoms remained in remission. At 38 weeks of gestation she underwent cesarean section and delivered a healthy female infant weighing 3043 g and with no congenital malformations. The infant received routine vaccinations with no adverse events. Ustekinumab treatment was resumed at 7 weeks postpartum. The ustekinumab concentration in maternal serum at 12 days after injection (30.7 weeks of gestation) was 7968.5 ng/mL, and it decreased to 106.1 ng/mL at 114 days after the last dose. In cord blood, the ustekinumab concentration was 1131.2 ng/mL at 65 days after the last dose; this was 2.5 times higher than that in the maternal serum, which was consistent with a previous report. Ustekinumab was detected in infant serum collected at 71 days after the last maternal dose (299.0 ng/mL), with rapid elimination from the infant's body. In breast milk, the maximum ustekinumab concentrations were 13.6 ng/mL at 9 days after the last maternal dose, respectively. The ratio of the calculated areas under the time-concentration curves of ustekinumab in breast milk and maternal serum was 0.0008 (257.1/327632.7), which was comparable with a previous human study. Conclusion: The placental transfer and breast milk secretion of ustekinumab in our case were comparable with previous reports. Use of ustekinumab during pregnancy and lactation was feasible in this case. Further research is needed to clarify the safety of ustekinumab during pregnancy and lactation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

What is known and objective: Statins are associated with improved pregnancy outcomes in patients with preeclamptic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and intrauterine foetal death. Several studies showed that statins are not teratogenic. However, data characterizing placental transfer and excretion of pravastatin into breast milk are limited. Case summary: We experienced two patients diagnosed with APS received 10 mg of pravastatin from the first trimester until delivery to prevent pre‐eclampsia. Pravastatin concentrations in maternal serum, infant serum and cord blood were evaluated. The estimated maternal‐foetal transfer ratios of pravastatin in the two patients were 25.5% and 23.8% respectively. Pravastatin was eliminated from neonatal serum within 2 days. Both infants developed normally with no drug‐related adverse effects. Pravastatin was not detected in either patient's breast milk at 3 days after the last dose. What is new and conclusion: The infants delivered from the mothers who were treated with pravastatin during pregnancy had no apparent adverse effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A high prevalence of mental disorders including depression, anxiety, somatoform, and dissociative disorder is reported during pregnancy, however, information on the transfer of antipsychotics across the placenta and into breast milk is limited. We evaluated brotizolam, periciazine and sulpiride in cord blood, maternal serum, and breast milk, and alprazolam in breast milk. Case presentation: A 38-year-old woman with dissociative disorder was treated with brotizolam, propericiazine, and sulpiride during pregnancy and lactation, and alprazolam during lactation. The drug concentration ratios for both cord blood and maternal serum were 33.3 and 61.5% for brotizolam and sulpiride, respectively, and periciazine (metabolite of propericiazine) was not detected in the cord blood. In breast milk, alprazolam (0.9 ng/mL), sulpiride (445.8 ng/mL), and periciazine (0.3 ng/mL) concentrations were noted at 7.5 h after the last dose on postpartum, whereas brotizolam was not detected. The relative infant doses via breast milk were 1.4, 2.7 and 0.02% of the maternal daily dose, respectively. The neonate had no congenital anomalies and did not experience any severe withdrawal symptoms after birth. Conclusion: Use of brotizolam, propericiazine, and sulpiride during pregnancy and lactation, and use of alprazolam during lactation were acceptable in this case. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Safety information on diazoxide for pregnant and lactating women with hypoglycemia is limited. In this case report, we assessed diazoxide concentrations in maternal and infant blood, cord blood, and breast milk. We described a 30-year-old pregnant woman diagnosed with hypoglycemia due to nesidioblastosis at 4 months of age. Before becoming pregnant, she was treated with oral diazoxide (75–375 mg). All medications were discontinued after she was discovered to be pregnant. During gestational week 25, diazoxide treatment was resumed at 150–175 mg daily for repeated hypoglycemic episodes. Diazoxide administration was continued in combination with diet treatment until delivery. Glucose levels were well controlled. During gestational week 40, a male infant weighing 3069 g was delivered via spontaneous vaginal delivery with no pregnancy or neonatal complications. Diazoxide concentrations detected in maternal serum at 2.5–11.6 h after oral treatment ranged from 12.4 to 32.7 µg/mL. In cord blood, the diazoxide concentration was 18.5 µg/mL at 7.2 h after the last dose. During lactation, no hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia was observed. The approximate calculated ratio of diazoxide in breast milk and maternal serum was 0.09. The calculated daily infant dose was 0.47 mg/kg/day. The relative infant dose via breast milk ranged from 3.1% to 5.9%. Diazoxide transferred from maternal blood to the fetus across the placenta. It also transferred into breast milk, but there were no harmful effects on the infant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The demand for tocilizumab is increasing in women who wish to bear children and who have active rheumatoid arthritis. Described here is a woman with rheumatoid arthritis who discontinued her tocilizumab therapy at the end of the first trimester and resumed it after delivery and where tocilizumab levels in maternal serum, infant serum, and the breast milk were measured. Tocilizumab was not detected in maternal serum just before delivery, or in umbilical cord blood or infant serum after birth. Tocilizumab levels in colostrum after intravenous injection were 0.57% of those in serum. Tocilizumab treatment in the first trimester was not associated with a significant drug level in the fetus at delivery and no fetal complications were noted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The infant dose I via i breast milk was 0.95% of the maternal daily dose, that was considered to be acceptable,8 even though the drug information states that etizolam use should be avoided during breastfeeding.5 To clarify more accurate information about etizolam excretion into breastmilk, a detailed etizolam concentration profile including maximum concentration in breastmilk following oral etizolam administration will be required. Anxiety disorders may require pharmacological treatment, and it has been estimated that 10% to 26% of pregnant women with these disorders are prescribed benzodiazepines or benzodiazepine-like hypnotic drugs.1,2 These medications cross the placental and blood-brain barriers, may affect fetal growth and development,3 and have been associated with increased risks of preterm birth, low Apgar score, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.4 Etizolam, a benzodiazepine-class anxiolytic, is prescribed for the treatment and management of agitation, tension, insomnia and anxiety.5 Due to the limited market distribution and use of etizolam worldwide, only one report from Japan published the information on etizolam transfer into breast milk.6 Furthermore, the information on etizolam transfer into the fetal circulation is limited. Benzodiazepine concentrations in the breast milk and plasma of nursing mothers: Estimation of relative infant dose. [Extracted from the article]