Search

Background: Instructing and guiding patients after surgery is essential for successful recovery. However, the time that health-care professionals can spend with their patients postoperatively has been reduced because of efficiency-driven, shortened hospital stays. We evaluated the effect of a personalised e-health-care programme on return to normal activities after surgery.Methods: A multicentre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial was done at seven teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients aged 18-75 years who were scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia surgery, or laparoscopic adnexal surgery for a benign indication were recruited. An independent researcher randomly allocated participants to either the intervention or control group using computer-based randomisation lists, with stratification by sex, type of surgery, and hospital. Participants in the intervention group had access to a perioperative, personalised, e-health-care programme, which managed recovery expectations and provided postoperative guidance tailored to the patient. The control group received usual care and access to a placebo website containing standard general recovery advice. Participants were unaware of the study hypothesis and were asked to complete questionnaires at five timepoints during the 6-month period after surgery. The primary outcome was time between surgery and return to normal activities, measured using personalised patient-reported outcome measures. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were done. This trial is registered in the Netherlands National Trial Register, number NTR4699.Findings: Between Aug 24, 2015, and Aug 12, 2016, 344 participants were enrolled and randomly allocated to either the intervention (n=173) or control (n=171) group. 14 participants (4%) were lost to follow-up, with 330 participants included in the primary outcome analysis. Median time until return to normal activities was 21 days (95% CI 17-25) in the intervention group and 26 days (20-32) in the control group (hazard ratio 1·38, 95% CI 1·09-1·73; p=0·007). Complications did not differ between groups.Interpretation: A personalised e-health intervention after abdominal surgery speeds up the return to normal activities compared with usual care. Implementation of this e-health programme is recommended in patients undergoing intermediate-grade abdominal, gynaecological, or general surgical procedures.Funding: ZonMw. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of bipolar radiofrequency (Novasure®) ablation and balloon endometrial ablation (Thermablate®).Study Design: We performed a multi-center double blind, randomized controlled trial in three hospitals in The Netherlands. Women with heavy menstrual bleeding were randomly allocated to bipolar or balloon endometrial ablation, performed in the office, using a paracervical block. The primary outcome was amenorrhea. Secondary outcome measures were pain, satisfaction, quality of life and reintervention.Results: 104 women were randomized into the bipolar (52) and balloon (52) groups. After 12 months amenorrhea rates were 56% (29/52) in the bipolar group and 23% (12/52) in the balloon group (relative risk (RR) 0.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4-0.8). The mean visual analog pain score of the total procedure was 7.1 in the bipolar group and 7.4 in the balloon group (P<.577). 87% (45/52) of the patients in the bipolar group were satisfied with the result of the treatment versus 69% (36/52) in the balloon group (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.2-0.97). The reintervention rates were 5/52 (10%) in the bipolar group and 6/52 (12%) in the balloon group (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.9-1.2). Quality of life (Shaw score) improved over time (P<.001) and was significantly higher in the bipolar group at 12 months follow-up (P=.025).Conclusion: In the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding, bipolar radiofrequency endometrial ablation is superior to balloon endometrial ablation as an office procedure in amenorrhea rate, patient satisfaction and quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To examine whether intrauterine application of auto-crosslinked hyaluronic acid (ACP) gel, after dilatation and curettage (D&C), reduces the incidence of intrauterine adhesions (IUAs).Design: Multicenter; women and assessors blinded prospective randomized trial.Setting: University and university-affiliated teaching hospitals.Patient(s): A total of 152 women with a miscarriage of <14 weeks with at least one previous D&C for miscarriage or termination of pregnancy.Intervention(s): Women were randomly assigned to either D&C plus ACP gel (intervention group) or D&C alone (control group). A follow-up diagnostic hysteroscopy was scheduled 8-12 weeks after the D&C procedure.Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary outcome was the number of women with IUAs and the secondary outcome was the severity of IUAs.Result(s): Outcomes were available for 149 women: 77 in the intervention group and 72 in the control group. The IUAs were observed in 10 (13.0%) and 22 women (30.6%), respectively (relative risk, 0.43; 95% confidence interval 0.22-0.83). Mean adhesion score and the amount of moderate-to-severe IUAs were significantly lower in the intervention group according to the American Fertility Society (AFS) and European Society of Gynecological Endoscopy classifications systems of adhesions.Conclusion(s): Intrauterine application of ACP gel after D&C for miscarriage in women with at least one previous D&C seems to reduce the incidence and severity of IUAs but does not eliminate the process of adhesion formation completely. Future studies are needed to confirm our findings and to evaluate the effect of ACP gel on fertility and reproductive outcomes.Clinical Trial Registration Number: NTR 3120. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]