Search

PURPOSE Cognitive diagnostic work-up in primary care is not always physically feasible, owing to chronic disabilities and/or travel restrictions. The identification of dementia might be facilitated with diagnostic instruments that are time efficient and easy to perform, as well as useful in the remote setting. We assessed whether the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS) might be a simple and accurate alternative for remote diagnostic cognitive screening in primary care. METHODS We administered the TICS (range, 0-41) for 810 of 1,473 older people aged 84.5 (SD, 2.4) years. We scrutinized electronic health records for participants with TICS scores [less than or equal to] 30 and for a random sample of participants with TICS scores >30 for a dementia diagnosis using all data from the Prevention of Dementia by Intensive Vascular Care (preDIVA) trial for 8-12 years of follow-up. We used multiple imputation to correct for verification bias. RESULTS Of the 810 participants, 155 (19.1%) had a TICS score [less than or equal to] 30, and 655 (80.9%) had a TICS score >30. Electronic health records yielded 8.4% (13/154) dementia diagnoses for participants with TICS [less than or equal to] 30 vs none with TICS >30. Multiple imputation for TICS >30 yielded a median of 7/655 (1.1%; interquartile range, 5-8) estimated dementia cases. After multiple imputation, the optimal cutoff score was [less than or equal to] 29, with mean sensitivity 65.4%, specificity 87.8%, positive predictive value 11.9%, negative predictive value 99.0%, and area under the curve 77.4% (95% CI, 56.3%-90.0%). CONCLUSIONS In the present older population, the TICS performed well as a diagnostic screening instrument for excluding dementia and might be particularly useful when face-toface diagnostic screening is not feasible in family practice or research settings. The potential reach to large numbers of people at low cost could contribute to more efficient medical management in primary care. Ann Fam Med 2022;20:130-136. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2768, INTRODUCTION In recent decades, increasing emphasis has been placed on early intervention in the care and treatment of persons with dementia to help provide more efficient medical management and advanced [...]

Background:Previous findings suggest that apathy symptoms independently of depressive symptoms measured using the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) are associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) in older individuals. Aims:To study whether apathy and depressive symptoms in older people are associated with future CVD, stroke, and mortality using individual patient-data meta-analysis. Methods:Medline, Embase, and PsycInfo databases up to September 3, 2013, were systematically searched without language restrictions. We sought prospective studies with older (mean age ≥65 years) community-dwelling populations in which the GDS was employed and subsequent stroke and/or CVD were recorded to provide individual participant data. Apathy symptoms were defined as the three apathy-related subitems of the GDS, with depressive symptoms the remaining items. We used myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and all-cause mortality as main outcomes. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, and MI/stroke history. An adaptation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to evaluate bias. Hazard ratios were calculated using one-stage random-effect Cox regression models. Results:Of the 52 eligible studies, 21 (40.4%) were included, comprising 47,625 older people (mean age [standard deviation] 74 [7.4] years), over a median follow-up of 8.8 years. Participants with apathy symptoms had a 21% higher risk of MI (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.36), a 37% higher risk of stroke (95% CI 1.18-1.59), and a 47% higher risk of all-cause mortality (95% CI 1.38-1.56). Participants with depressive symptoms had a comparably higher risk of stroke (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.18-1.56) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.35-1.53), but not of MI (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.91-1.29). Associations for isolated apathy and isolated depressive symptoms were comparable. Sensitivity analyses according to risk of bias yielded similar results. Conclusion:Our findings stress the clinical importance of recognizing apathy independently of depressive symptoms, and could help physicians identify persons at increased risk of vascular disease.

Consistent cerebral blood flow (CBF) is fundamental to brain function. Cerebral autoregulation ensures CBF stability. Chronic hypertension can lead to disrupted cerebral autoregulation in older people, potentially leading to blood pressure levels interfering with CBF. This study tested whether low BP and AHD use are associated with contemporaneous low CBF, and whether longitudinal change in BP is associated with change in CBF, using arterial spin labelling (ASL) MRI, in a prospective longitudinal cohort of 186 community-dwelling older individuals with hypertension (77 ± 3 years, 53% female), 125 (67%) of whom with 3-year follow-up. Diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and pulse pressure were assessed as blood pressure parameters. As additional cerebrovascular marker, we evaluated the ASL signal spatial coefficient of variation (ASL SCoV), a measure of ASL signal heterogeneity that may reflect cerebrovascular health. We found no associations between any of the blood pressure measures and concurrent CBF nor between changes in blood pressure measures and CBF over three-year follow-up. Antihypertensive use was associated with lower grey matter CBF (−5.49 ml/100 g/min, 95%CI = −10.7|−0.27, p = 0.04) and higher ASL SCoV (0.32 SD, 95%CI = 0.12|0.52, p = 0.002). These results warrant future research on the potential relations between antihypertensive use and cerebral perfusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]