Namen magistrske naloge je predstaviti razred kot socialno skupino, s poudarkom na lastnostih in delu učitelja. V teoretičnem delu predstavim zgodovino šolstva v Sloveniji in osvetlim pojme: skupina, razred, učitelj, učenec in učilnica. Predstavim najznačilnejše, v praksi najbolj pogosto uporabljene stile vodenja razreda. V kvalitativno raziskavo so vključene tri učiteljice razrednega pouka, ki k raziskavi pristopijo prostovoljno. Z vsako učiteljico posebej preživim tri dni v razredu in jo opazujem pri njenem vodenju razreda. Pozorna sem na štiri ključne postavke, ki jih določim že pred opazovanjem: 1. učiteljičino vodenje, 2. strukturiranje pouka, 3. komunikacija/interakcije med učiteljico in učencem/-i, 4. učenčevi odzivi na interakcije (med učenci/z učiteljico). Po vsakem opazovanju sledi še polstrukturiran intervju. Rezultati nekajdnevnega opazovanja z udeležbo in beleženja interakcije med učiteljico in učenci nakazujejo, da učiteljice razred vodijo vsaka na svoj način. Dve učiteljici se poslužujeta avtoritativnega načina vodenja razreda, za katerega je značilno, da razredno klimo gradita na lastnih vrednotah, v razredu iščeta pravo mero med avtoriteto in dogovori, znotraj razreda so postavljene smiselne meje, za prekrške so že vnaprej dogovorjene kazni, učence vzgajata k samostojnosti in odgovornosti. Ena učiteljica pa se bolj poslužuje avtoritarnega načina vodenja. Učenci so v podrejenem položaju, delo večinoma poteka frontalno, učiteljica ima do učencev visoka pričakovanja. Med opazovanjem sem zaznala, da so učenci pri učiteljici, ki uporablja avtoritarni način vodenja razreda, bolj previdni. Iz strahospoštovanja upoštevajo njena navodila. Vsak dan nestrpno čakajo učiteljičin prihod na prvo uro, ki pove, kakšne volje je učiteljica. Če je dobre, se vidno sprostijo, drugače pa ostanejo na trnih. Drugi dve učiteljici, ki uporabljata avtoritativni način, razred vodita umirjeno. Učenci lepo sodelujejo pri pouku, spoštujejo pravila in dogovore, ki jih imajo, ter se znajo tudi nasmejati in poveseliti skupaj. Pri vodenju razreda ne moremo izpostaviti le enega, najprimernejšega načina vodenja. Potrebno se je zavedati, da je razred živ material, ki raste, se razvija. Slediti je treba spremembam in potrebam učencev. The aim of this master′s thesis is to present classroom as a social community, focusing on teacher’s work. In the theoretical part, the thesis describes the history of schooling in Slovenian geographical area and defines concepts such as group, teacher, student and classroom. The most typical and commonly used classroom management styles are also presented. Data for the qualitative research are obtained from three class teachers who voluntarily participate in the research. Each teacher is observed over three days, with the aim to explore the four pre-defined items: teacher′ s classroom management, lesson structure, teacher-student communication, student-teacher interaction. Observations are followed by semi-structured interviews. The findings of this research show that each teacher has her own way of managing the class. Two of the observed teachers employ authoritative teaching style, creating classroom atmosphere based on their own values, trying to achieve the right balance between authority and agreements, and educating students to become independent and responsible persons. These two teachers have clear boundaries with rules. Furthermore, they inform students of the penalties in advance. The third teacher employs authoritarian approach with frontal teaching practices, where students are in inferior position. The teacher has high expectations for her students. Consequently, as seen from the classroom observation, the students are very careful to follow her directions without asking why. What is more, they are waiting to assess her mood every morning. Depending on her mood, the students are either relaxed or more reserved during the lesson. Contrarily, the first two teachers take a relaxed, relationship-oriented authoritative approach to classroom management, where students have clear rules and agreements to follow, they are happy, they know how to smile and they participate in class. Considering that classroom is a living thing, which grows and develops, we cannot emphasise just one, most appropriate classroom management style. It is necessary to keep pace with changing times as well as students’ needs.