Search

Abstract Background Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM) is defined as a lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) involving the bone marrow (BM) with presence of IgM monoclonal protein, and comprises > 95% of all LPL cases. Rituximab-based regimens have been predominant in the management of WM. Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) are a primary concern with rituximab, although it is generally better tolerated with less toxicity than conventional anticancer agents. Here, we present an autopsy case of an elderly man who died suddenly after receiving the initial infusion of rituximab for WM/LPL. Case presentation An 84-year-old man was found dead in his bedroom. He had undergone the initial intravenous rituximab infusion for progressive anemia related to Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia/lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (WM/LPL) approximately 15 h before death. Although the protocol for rituximab administration and additional medication was considered appropriate, he exhibited several symptoms consistent with infusion-related reactions (IRRs) during the infusion. Autopsy revealed monotonous proliferation of small-to-medium-sized lymphocytic cells in the bone marrow, consistent with the premortem diagnosis of WM/LPL. Additionally, immunoglobulin λ-light chain-derived amyloid (ALλ) deposition was identified in all organs other than the brain. Although ALλ deposition and LPL infiltration were found in the heart, they were not severe enough to cause severe functional impairment. Severe congestion and/or edema were observed in the lungs, liver, and brain. Although significant inflammatory cell infiltration was not found in any organs, laboratory tests revealed elevated serum levels of inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α and the presence of IgM-λ monoclonal protein. Conclusion Acute IRRs associated with the initial rituximab infusion were the major contributing factor to his sudden unexpected death. The autopsy findings of present case suggest the necessity for thorough monitoring of older patients with WM/LPL undergoing rituximab treatment, particularly when pronounced IRRs occur during the first administration, in addition to investigating complications of WM/LPL before infusion.

Background: Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) is defined as a lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) involving the bone marrow (BM) with presence of IgM monoclonal protein, and comprises > 95% of all LPL cases. Rituximab-based regimens have been predominant in the management of WM. Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) are a primary concern with rituximab, although it is generally better tolerated with less toxicity than conventional anticancer agents. Here, we present an autopsy case of an elderly man who died suddenly after receiving the initial infusion of rituximab for WM/LPL. Case presentation: An 84-year-old man was found dead in his bedroom. He had undergone the initial intravenous rituximab infusion for progressive anemia related to Waldenström's macroglobulinemia/lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (WM/LPL) approximately 15 h before death. Although the protocol for rituximab administration and additional medication was considered appropriate, he exhibited several symptoms consistent with infusion-related reactions (IRRs) during the infusion. Autopsy revealed monotonous proliferation of small-to-medium-sized lymphocytic cells in the bone marrow, consistent with the premortem diagnosis of WM/LPL. Additionally, immunoglobulin λ-light chain-derived amyloid (ALλ) deposition was identified in all organs other than the brain. Although ALλ deposition and LPL infiltration were found in the heart, they were not severe enough to cause severe functional impairment. Severe congestion and/or edema were observed in the lungs, liver, and brain. Although significant inflammatory cell infiltration was not found in any organs, laboratory tests revealed elevated serum levels of inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α and the presence of IgM-λ monoclonal protein. Conclusion: Acute IRRs associated with the initial rituximab infusion were the major contributing factor to his sudden unexpected death. The autopsy findings of present case suggest the necessity for thorough monitoring of older patients with WM/LPL undergoing rituximab treatment, particularly when pronounced IRRs occur during the first administration, in addition to investigating complications of WM/LPL before infusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: With the increasing use of daratumumab (DARA)‐containing regimens for multiple myeloma (MM) patients in China, the standard infusion time of DARA is long, with the potential for infusion‐related reactions (IRRs) and increased hospitalization and use of resources. Shortening the duration of DARA infusion helps to optimize the hospital stay and enhance the patient treatment experience. The current, commonly used 90‐min rapid DARA infusion regimen may not be applicable to Chinese MM patients, and therefore, we explored a new 110‐min rapid DARA infusion regimen aimed at reducing the treatment burden on patients to guarantee therapeutic safety. Methods: MM inpatients treated with the DARA regimen were divided into two groups according to the number of times the DARA regimen was used: a standard infusion regimen for patients treated with the first two doses of DARA and a 110‐min rapid infusion regimen for patients treated with more than two doses of DARA. Anti‐allergy medications were routinely administered prior to the start of DARA infusion, patient consent, and authorization was obtained for all treatments, and statistical evaluation of the results was conducted via descriptive analyses, one‐way ANOVA and chi‐square tests. Results: A total of 129 patients were included in this study: 68 in the standard infusion group, with 121 DARA infusions, and 129 in the rapid infusion group (patients who participated in the standard infusion subsequently participated in the rapid infusion), with 738 DARA infusions. The incidence of IRRs was 27.27% (36/121) in the standard infusion group and 1.35% (10/738) in the rapid infusion group, which were significantly different (p < 0.001). The incidence of IRRs after rapid infusion in other studies was <6%. The incidence of grade 1 IRRs in the rapid infusion group was 0.81% (6/738), the incidence of grade 2 IRRs was 0.54% (4/738), and there were no IRRs above grade 3; age, sex, and underlying disease had no effect on the choice of infusion method (p > 0.05). The mean infusion time after the occurrence of IRRs was also shorter in the rapid infusion group than in the standard infusion group (F = 24.781, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The 110‐min rapid infusion DARA regimen is feasible and safe for use in Chinese MM patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background With the increasing use of daratumumab (DARA)‐containing regimens for multiple myeloma (MM) patients in China, the standard infusion time of DARA is long, with the potential for infusion‐related reactions (IRRs) and increased hospitalization and use of resources. Shortening the duration of DARA infusion helps to optimize the hospital stay and enhance the patient treatment experience. The current, commonly used 90‐min rapid DARA infusion regimen may not be applicable to Chinese MM patients, and therefore, we explored a new 110‐min rapid DARA infusion regimen aimed at reducing the treatment burden on patients to guarantee therapeutic safety. Methods MM inpatients treated with the DARA regimen were divided into two groups according to the number of times the DARA regimen was used: a standard infusion regimen for patients treated with the first two doses of DARA and a 110‐min rapid infusion regimen for patients treated with more than two doses of DARA. Anti‐allergy medications were routinely administered prior to the start of DARA infusion, patient consent, and authorization was obtained for all treatments, and statistical evaluation of the results was conducted via descriptive analyses, one‐way ANOVA and chi‐square tests. Results A total of 129 patients were included in this study: 68 in the standard infusion group, with 121 DARA infusions, and 129 in the rapid infusion group (patients who participated in the standard infusion subsequently participated in the rapid infusion), with 738 DARA infusions. The incidence of IRRs was 27.27% (36/121) in the standard infusion group and 1.35% (10/738) in the rapid infusion group, which were significantly different (p 0.05). The mean infusion time after the occurrence of IRRs was also shorter in the rapid infusion group than in the standard infusion group (F = 24.781, p

Key Clinical Message This report documents the treatment of a 41‐year‐old male with sickle cell disease (SCD) and repeated stuttering priapism using crizanlizumab, which alleviated the priapism but induced a significant vaso‐occlusive crisis during the second infusion. Encouragingly, no subsequent vaso‐occlusive crises occurred. However, the potential for infusion‐related adverse events warrants close supervision. Further research is necessary to explore its full benefits on priapism management.

Key Clinical Message: This report documents the treatment of a 41‐year‐old male with sickle cell disease (SCD) and repeated stuttering priapism using crizanlizumab, which alleviated the priapism but induced a significant vaso‐occlusive crisis during the second infusion. Encouragingly, no subsequent vaso‐occlusive crises occurred. However, the potential for infusion‐related adverse events warrants close supervision. Further research is necessary to explore its full benefits on priapism management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Monoclonal antibodies, such as PD-1 inhibitors, are increasingly used in various cancers. Acute low back pain as infusion-related reaction (IRR) to monoclonal antibodies is poorly described. We report a bicentric series of 10 cases of acute low back pain due to administration of monoclonal antibodies directed against PD-1/PD-L1 for skin cancer treatment in patients treated at University Hospital Heidelberg and University Medical Center Mainz (Germany). The management of IRR symptoms was immediate interruption of infusion and analgesia leading to quick improvement and complete symptom relief in all patients. Our findings suggest that the risk of developing low back pain as IRR is depending on the concentration of the administered drug. Low back pain as IRR can be managed by early interruption of infusion and by decreasing the infusion rate or concentration in following administrations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Alpha‐mannosidosis (AM), an autosomal recessive disorder caused by pathogenic biallelic variants in the MAN2B1 gene, leads to lysosomal alpha‐mannosidase deficiency and accumulation of mannose‐rich oligosaccharides. Velmanase alfa (VA), a recombinant human lysosomal alpha‐mannosidase, is the first enzyme replacement therapy for non‐neurological symptoms of AM. Previously, a potential relationship was identified between three MAN2B1 genotype/subcellular localization subgroups (G1, G2, and G3) and AM disease severity. In VA‐treated patients with AM, it is unknown if a relationship exists between MAN2B1 genotype/subcellular localization subgroups, antidrug antibodies (ADAs), and infusion‐related reactions (IRRs). This pooled analysis evaluated data from 33 VA‐treated patients with AM to investigate this relationship. Overall, 10 patients were positive for ADAs, 4 of whom had treatment‐emergent ADAs (G1: 3/7 [43%]; G2: 1/17 [6%]; G3: 0/9). Treatment‐emergent ADA‐positive patients with relatively high titers (n = 2; G1: 1012 U/ml and G2: 440 U/ml) experienced mild/moderate IRRs that were well‐managed; patients with lower titers (n = 2) experienced no IRRs. Overall, changes from baseline in serum oligosaccharides and immunoglobulin G levels did not vary between ADA‐positive and ADA‐negative patients, suggesting a similar effect of VA treatment regardless of ADA status in most patients. Clinical outcomes (3MSCT and 6MWT) were also similar in most patients regardless of ADA status. While further studies are needed, these data suggest a relationship between MAN2B1 genotype/subcellular localization subgroups and ADA development, with G1 and G2 subgroups more likely to develop ADAs and IRRs. Regardless, this study suggests that ADAs have limited effect on the clinical impact of VA in most patients with AM.

Monoclonal antibodies, such as PD-1 inhibitors, are increasingly used in various cancers. Acute low back pain as infusion-related reaction (IRR) to monoclonal antibodies is poorly described. We report a bicentric series of 10 cases of acute low back pain due to administration of monoclonal antibodies directed against PD-1/PD-L1 for skin cancer treatment in patients treated at University Hospital Heidelberg and University Medical Center Mainz (Germany). The management of IRR symptoms was immediate interruption of infusion and analgesia leading to quick improvement and complete symptom relief in all patients. Our findings suggest that the risk of developing low back pain as IRR is depending on the concentration of the administered drug. Low back pain as IRR can be managed by early interruption of infusion and by decreasing the infusion rate or concentration in following administrations.

B cell-depleting therapies such as ocrelizumab (OCR) are highly effective in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Especially at treatment start and initial infusion, infusion-related reactions (IRR) are a common adverse event. The relevance of acute changes of cell-depleting therapies on peripheral immune compartments and routine lab testing is important for clinical practice. We systematically analyzed routine blood parameters, detailed blood immunophenotyping and serum cytokine profiles in 45 MS patients starting on OCR. Blood samples were collected before and after corticosteroid premedication and directly after each OCR infusion of the first three ocrelizumab infusions. Blood B cells were rapidly depleted and accompanied only by a mild cytokine release at the first OCR infusion. Cytokine release was not significantly detectable from a third application in line with decreasing IRRs. B cell depletion was accompanied by short-lived changes in other immune cell populations in number, activation and cytokine secretion after each OCR infusion. Standard lab parameters did not show any clinically relevant changes. Our data demonstrate only mild changes during the first OCR infusion, which are not present any more during long-term treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sickle cell disease is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by the presence of sickle hemoglobin that leads to chronic hemolysis and vaso-occlusive crisis. After decades of limited therapy options, crizanlizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2019 for sickle cell-related pain crises for patients 16 years of age and above. Although rare, infusion-related reactions, including painful crises, occurred in 3% as per the package insert. However, the data on how to deal with such reactions and about further treatment outcomes are limited as most patients stopped crizanlizumab after the reaction. Herein, we report the good outcome of 13 doses of crizanlizumab in a 19-year-old female patient with sickle cell disease on hydroxyurea, despite experiencing a severe infusion-related painful crisis during the second infusion. Additional benefits of crizanlizumab, in this case, were preventing new episodes of acute chest syndrome, quitting chronic narcotics use, and a remarkable improvement in quality of life and overall performance.

The most common adverse reactions to rituximab are infusion-related reactions (IRR). We evaluated the efficacy of split dosing the first rituximab infusion over two days to reduce IRR incidence in patients with hematological cancer and a high lymphocyte count. This is a retrospective observational study conducted in two healthcare centers in Quebec, Canada. The study enrolled patients with white blood cell counts ≥25.0 × 109/L who received their first rituximab dose for hematological cancer between December 2007 and May 2020. One healthcare center used asymmetrical split dosing, while the other used symmetrical split dosing. A total of 183 treatment episodes were collected from 143 patients. Among patients who received a fractionated dosing schedule, 42% developed an IRR from the first rituximab infusion compared with 50% for the standard protocol (adjusted relative risk, 0.89; p = 0.540). No significant difference was observed in IRR severity between either groups. However, 24% of patients who received the asymmetrical protocol developed an IRR compared to 68% for the symmetrical protocol (adjusted relative risk, 0.32; p = 0.003). These results suggest that an asymmetrical split dosing could be effective in reducing the incidence of IRR and is preferable to a symmetrical one.

Background: The antibody-mediated prevention (AMP) studies (HVTN 703/HPTN 081 and HVTN 704/HPTN 085) are harmonized phase 2b trials to assess HIV prevention efficacy and safety of intravenous infusion of anti-gp120 broadly neutralizing antibody VRC01. Antibodies for other indications can elicit infusion-related reactions (IRRs), often requiring premedication and limiting their application. We report on AMP study IRRs. Methods: From 2016 to 2018, 2699 HIV-uninfected, at-risk men and transgender adults in the Americas and Switzerland (704/085) and 1924 at-risk heterosexual women in sub-Saharan Africa (703/081) were randomized 1:1:1 to VRC01 10 mg/kg, 30 mg/kg, or placebo. Participants received infusions every 8 weeks (n = 10/participant) over 72 weeks, with 104 weeks of follow-up. Safety assessments were conducted before and after infusion and at noninfusion visits. A total of 40,674 infusions were administered. Results: Forty-seven participants (1.7%) experienced 49 IRRs in 704/085; 93 (4.8%) experienced 111 IRRs in 703/081 (P < 0.001). IRRs occurred more frequently in VRC01 than placebo recipients in 703/081 (P < 0.001). IRRs were associated with atopic history (P = 0.046) and with younger age (P = 0.023) in 703/081. Four clinical phenotypes of IRRs were observed: urticaria, dyspnea, dyspnea with rash, and "other." Urticaria was most prevalent, occurring in 25 (0.9%) participants in 704/085 and 41 (2.1%) participants in 703/081. Most IRRs occurred with the initial infusion and incidence diminished through the last infusion. All reactions were managed successfully without sequelae. Conclusions: IRRs in the AMP studies were uncommon, typically mild or moderate, successfully managed at the research clinic, and resolved without sequelae. Analysis is ongoing to explore potential IRR mechanisms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab is the backbone of most anti-multiple myeloma (MM) regimens. To mitigate the risk of infusion-related reactions (IRRs), intravenous daratumumab administration requires 7 hours for the first infusion and 3.5-4 hours thereafter, thus making daratumumab-containing regimens burdensome for patients and health care resources. Preliminary data suggest that a rapid (90-minute) infusion of daratumumab is safe and does not increase IRRs. The rapid schedule was adopted by our centers since 2019. Methods: We conducted an observational multi-center, real-life study to assess the safety of rapid daratumumab infusion protocol from the third administration in relapsed MM patients receiving daratumumab alone or in combination with lenalidomide-dexamethasone or bortezomib-dexamethasone. The primary endpoint was the safety of the rapid infusion protocol, particularly in terms of IRRs. Results: A total of 134 MM patients were enrolled. IRRs occurred in 7 (5%) patients and were mostly mild (6/7 of grade 1-2), with only 1 patient experiencing a grade 3 IRR. Due to the IRRs, 5 (3.7%) patients discontinued the rapid infusions and resumed daratumumab at the standard infusion rate, while 1 patient permanently discontinued daratumumab. In 4/7 patients (57%), IRRs occurred while resuming rapid daratumumab infusions after a temporary interruption (2-4 months). No other adverse event was considered related to the rapid infusion protocol. Conclusions: Our findings confirmed the safety of rapid daratumumab infusions starting from the third administration. In case of prolonged daratumumab interruption, it is advisable to resume infusions at the standard rate (3.5 hours) before switching to the rapid infusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundThe anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab is the backbone of most anti-multiple myeloma (MM) regimens. To mitigate the risk of infusion-related reactions (IRRs), intravenous daratumumab administration requires 7 hours for the first infusion and 3.5-4 hours thereafter, thus making daratumumab-containing regimens burdensome for patients and health care resources. Preliminary data suggest that a rapid (90-minute) infusion of daratumumab is safe and does not increase IRRs. The rapid schedule was adopted by our centers since 2019.MethodsWe conducted an observational multi-center, real-life study to assess the safety of rapid daratumumab infusion protocol from the third administration in relapsed MM patients receiving daratumumab alone or in combination with lenalidomide-dexamethasone or bortezomib-dexamethasone. The primary endpoint was the safety of the rapid infusion protocol, particularly in terms of IRRs.ResultsA total of 134 MM patients were enrolled. IRRs occurred in 7 (5%) patients and were mostly mild (6/7 of grade 1-2), with only 1 patient experiencing a grade 3 IRR. Due to the IRRs, 5 (3.7%) patients discontinued the rapid infusions and resumed daratumumab at the standard infusion rate, while 1 patient permanently discontinued daratumumab. In 4/7 patients (57%), IRRs occurred while resuming rapid daratumumab infusions after a temporary interruption (2-4 months). No other adverse event was considered related to the rapid infusion protocol.ConclusionsOur findings confirmed the safety of rapid daratumumab infusions starting from the third administration. In case of prolonged daratumumab interruption, it is advisable to resume infusions at the standard rate (3.5 hours) before switching to the rapid infusion.

Background: Although the biological agent ustekinumab (UST) is reported to be effective for Crohn's disease (CD) in pediatric as well as adult patients, data on the efficacy and safety of UST in pediatric patients with CD are limited. Here, we describe the case of a pediatric patient who showed an allergic reaction to UST after subcutaneous (SC) maintenance injections but not immediately after initial intravenous (IV) injection.Case Presentation: A 9-year-old boy presented to our hospital with diarrhea lasting 2 years and weight loss, leading to the diagnosis of CD. After prednisolone (PSL) was tapered and discontinued, he promptly relapsed. According to our institution's protocol, we introduced the biological agent infliximab (IFX) with premedication. Coughing and vomiting was observed after the second dose of IFX and it was changed to adalimumab (ADA). However, the effect of ADA gradually disappeared after 18 months; therefore, it was discontinued and he was treated using UST. The first IV UST dose was given after administering hydrocortisone (HDC), an antiallergic and antipyretic analgesic, as premedication, and no obvious adverse reaction was observed. After 8 weeks, UST was subcutaneously injected without premedication. The patient then complained of nausea, dizziness, and headache within 15 min of UST administration. Therefore, for the third dose of UST, HDC was administered again as premedication. However, nausea, dizziness, and headache presented 10 min after UST administration, resulting in discontinuation of further UST treatment.Conclusion: Careful distinction between “true” infusion-related reactions (IRRs) and anaphylaxis or allergic reactions is necessary to determine whether biological agents can be continued after the development of “so-called” IRRs. For true IRRs, it may be possible to continue using the biological agent with appropriate premedication; however, in cases of anaphylaxis, the biological agent itself should be changed.

B cell-depleting therapies such as ocrelizumab (OCR) are highly effective in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Especially at treatment start and initial infusion, infusion-related reactions (IRR) are a common adverse event. The relevance of acute changes of cell-depleting therapies on peripheral immune compartments and routine lab testing is important for clinical practice. We systematically analyzed routine blood parameters, detailed blood immunophenotyping and serum cytokine profiles in 45 MS patients starting on OCR. Blood samples were collected before and after corticosteroid premedication and directly after each OCR infusion of the first three ocrelizumab infusions. Blood B cells were rapidly depleted and accompanied only by a mild cytokine release at the first OCR infusion. Cytokine release was not significantly detectable from a third application in line with decreasing IRRs. B cell depletion was accompanied by short-lived changes in other immune cell populations in number, activation and cytokine secretion after each OCR infusion. Standard lab parameters did not show any clinically relevant changes. Our data demonstrate only mild changes during the first OCR infusion, which are not present any more during long-term treatment.

The most common adverse reactions to rituximab are infusion-related reactions (IRR). We evaluated the efficacy of split dosing the first rituximab infusion over two days to reduce IRR incidence in patients with hematological cancer and a high lymphocyte count. This is a retrospective observational study conducted in two healthcare centers in Quebec, Canada. The study enrolled patients with white blood cell counts ≥25.0 × 109/L who received their first rituximab dose for hematological cancer between December 2007 and May 2020. One healthcare center used asymmetrical split dosing, while the other used symmetrical split dosing. A total of 183 treatment episodes were collected from 143 patients. Among patients who received a fractionated dosing schedule, 42% developed an IRR from the first rituximab infusion compared with 50% for the standard protocol (adjusted relative risk, 0.89; p = 0.540). No significant difference was observed in IRR severity between either groups. However, 24% of patients who received the asymmetrical protocol developed an IRR compared to 68% for the symmetrical protocol (adjusted relative risk, 0.32; p = 0.003). These results suggest that an asymmetrical split dosing could be effective in reducing the incidence of IRR and is preferable to a symmetrical one. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This phase II clinical trial evaluated feasibility and tolerability of 90-minute rituximab infusion and a concentration of 4 mg/mL rituximab infusion in Japanese patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma., Methods: Treatment was rituximab with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone. In cycle 1, rituximab at a dose of 375 mg/m2 (4 mg/mL) was administered at the standard infusion rate stipulated in the package insert. On confirmed tolerance of rituximab, patients received 90-minute infusion in second and subsequent cycles. The primary endpoint was incidence of grade 3 or higher infusion-related reactions during 90-minute rituximab infusion in cycle 2 of rituximab with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone., Results: All 32 patients (median age 61.5 years, 16 males, 24 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma) completed the prescribed six or eight cycles of treatment. One patient withdrew consent after cycle 1, and another developed grade 2 erythema and continued receiving 4 mg/mL at the standard infusion rate for cycle 2. The remaining 30 patients received 90-minute rituximab infusion; 28 (93.3%) completed cycle 2 at the scheduled infusion rate and dosage. No grade 3 or higher infusion-related reactions were associated with a concentration of 4 mg/mL rituximab dose or 90-min rituximab infusion in cycle 2. The most common infusion-related reaction symptoms were pruritus, hypertension and oropharyngeal discomfort. During the study, toxicities and adverse events were as expected, with no new safety signals., Conclusion: High-concentration dosing (4 mg/mL) and 90-minute infusion of rituximab are feasible and tolerable in Japanese patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma., Clinical Trial Number: JapicCTI-173 663., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background/Aim: To prevent infusion-related reactions (IRRs), H1-antihistamines (H1AT) are recommended as a premedication for monoclonal antibodies, such as Ramucirumab (RAM), even though there are H1AT-related side effects, such as drowsiness and dizziness. Here, we investigated the safety of H1AT-free RAM regimens in patients with solid cancer. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the patients with solid cancer receiving RAM without H1AT at Osaka Medical College Hospital between 2015 and 2019. Results: Among the 123 registered patients, 58 were identified as eligible. The total number of RAM infusions was 291, and the median number of RAM administration was 4 cycles (range=1-23 cycles). IRRs were not observed in any patient. Conclusion: Although our data are preliminary and limited, H1AT-free RAM regimens may be a treatment option for cancer patients having a significant risk of developing H1AT-related side effects. Further studies are needed to confirm the safety of H1AT-free RAM regimens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fabry disease (FD) is an X-linked lysosomal disorder caused by mutations in GLA gene resulting in lack of or faulty α-galactosidase A (α-GalA) enzyme. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with recombinant human α-GalA enzyme (agalsidase) is the standard treatment option for FD. Infusion-related reactions (IRRs), with symptoms ranging from rigors, to fever, pain, vomiting, angioedema and diarrhea, are often seen due to immune response against the exogenous enzyme. To elucidate the mechanisms causing the IRRs in FD, eight patients who developed IRRs were investigated. All, except one, tested negative for agalsidase-specific IgE and had normal tryptase levels. Circulating dendritic cells were drastically reduced during IRRs, suggesting possible sequestration to the sites of inflammation. An increase in NK cells and a decrease in T cells were also observed. Cytokines IL-4, IL-8 and TNF-α showed a significant increase, indicating nonspecific degranulation of mast cells. All IRRs were managed successfully using a combination of standard premedications and mast cell stabilizers without any interruption of therapy. Taken together, the results indicate crosstalk between immune cells resulting in IgE-independent mast-cell-specific allergic inflammation. Mast cell stabilizers could be used to control IRRs and for safe reintroduction of agalsidase in patients previously treated with ERT.

Objective. The aim was to evaluate the incidence of serious infusion-related reactions (SIRRs) in RA treated by non-TNF-targeted biologics. Methods. We analysed data from three independent prospective registers, namely autoimmunity and rituximab, Orencia (abatacept) and RA (ORA) and Registry RoAcTEmra (tocilizumab), promoted by the French Society of Rheumatology and including patients with RA. SIRRs were defined by an occurrence during or within 24 h of an infusion and requiring discontinuation of treatment. Characteristics of patients with SIRRs were extracted from the electronic database. Results. Among the 4145 patients, SIRRs occurred in 100 patients: 56 patients with the rituximab cohort (2.8% or 0.7/100 patient-years), 15 with the abatacept cohort (1.5% or 0.6/100 patient-years) and 29 with tocilizumab (1.9% or 1/100 patient-years). No fatal SIRR occurred. A previous mild infusion reaction to non-TNF-targeted biologics was observed in a quarter of patients with SIRRs. After pooled multivariate analysis, positive anti-CCP was associated with a higher risk of SIRR (odds ratio = 2.5; 95% CI: 1.01, 6.17). Absence of concomitant treatment with a synthetic DMARD tended to be associated with a higher (risk of SIRR (odds ratio = 1.67; 95% CI: 1.00, 2.86). Conclusion. In daily practice, SIRRs are slightly more frequent than in clinical trials and rarely life threatening. In common practice, serological status (anti-CCP positivity) and absence of concomitant treatment with a synthetic DMARD increase the risk of SIRR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rituximab is a widely used anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with a high incidence of infusion-related reactions (IRRs) during administration. Reducing the incidence of IRRs remains problematic in hematological practices. In the present study, a novel strategy of a prednisone pretreatment regimen was designed similar to the combination of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) with the aim of exploring the effect on the incidence of IRRs to rituximab in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). A prospective, randomized (1:1) and controlled study was conducted in three regional hospitals in two groups (n=44 for each group): i) A control group treated with standard R-CHOP-like regimen; and ii) a group receiving a prednisone-pretreatment, modified R-CHOP-like protocol for newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL. The primary endpoint was to assess the incidence of IRRs to rituximab, as well as the association of IRRs with the efficacy of treatment. The second endpoint involved clinical outcomes. The total incidence of IRRs to rituximab in the treatment group was significantly lower compared with that in the control group (15.9 vs. 43.2%; P=0.0051). The different grade incidence of IRRs was lower in the treatment group compared with that in the control group (P=0.0053). In total, 29.5% of patients (26/88) experienced >1 IRR episode. The incidence of IRRs in the pre-treatment group was decreased compared with that in the control group in the 1st cycle (15.9 vs. 43.2%; P=0.0051) and 2nd cycle (6.8 vs. 27.3%; P=0.0107). The overall response rate was similar between the two groups (P>0.05). Median progression-free survival and median overall survival time were not statistically distinct between the two groups (P=0.5244 and P=0.5778, respectively). Grade ≥III toxicities mainly included vomiting and nausea (<20%), leukopenia and granulocytopenia (<20%), and alopecia (<25%). No death events were reported. Apart from IRRs to rituximab, the incidence of other adverse events was similar in both groups. The novel prednisone-pretreatment R-CHOP-like protocol in the present study significantly decreased the total and different grade incidences of IRRs to rituximab among newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL. This clinical trial was retrospectively registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number, ChiCTR2300070327; date of registration, 10 April 2023). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to compare infusion-related reactions and outcomes of using subcutaneous (subQ) alemtuzumab versus intravenous (i.v.) alemtuzumab as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis for matched unrelated donor stem cell transplantations. Outcomes include incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV)/Epstein-Barr (EBV) viremia, development of CMV disease or post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder, fatal infections, acute and chronic GVHD, time to engraftment, relapse rate, and survival. We conducted a retrospective study of all adult matched unrelated donor stem cell transplantations patients who received fludarabine/melphalan with subQ or i.v. alemtuzumab in combination with tacrolimus as part of their conditioning for unrelated donor transplantation at New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center from January 1, 2012 to March 21, 2014. Alemtuzumab was administered at a total cumulative dose of 100 mg (divided over days −7 to −3). Forty-six patients received an unrelated donor stem cell transplantation with fludarabine/melphalan and either subQ (n = 26) or i.v. (n = 20) alemtuzumab in combination with tacrolimus. Within the evaluable population, 130 subQ and 100 i.v. alemtuzumab doses were administered. For the primary outcome, ≥grade 2 infusion-related reactions occurred in 11 (8%) versus 25 (25%) infusions in the subQ and i.v. cohorts, respectively ( P = .001). Overall, 12 injections (9%) in the subQ arm versus 26 infusions (26%) in the i.v. arm experienced an infusion-related reaction of any grade ( P = .001). There were no significant differences between the subQ and i.v. arms in rates of reactivation of CMV/EBV, development of CMV disease or post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder, fatal infections, acute and chronic GVHD, relapse, or survival. Subcutaneous administration of alemtuzumab for GVHD prophylaxis was associated with fewer infusion-related reactions compared with i.v. administration in the SCT setting. Incidences of acute and chronic GVHD were similar between both arms. There was also no difference in reactivation of CMV/EBV viremia, development of CMV disease or post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder, fatal infections, relapse, or survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Alpha-mannosidosis (AM), an autosomal recessive disorder caused by pathogenic biallelic variants in the MAN2B1 gene, leads to lysosomal alpha-mannosidase deficiency and accumulation of mannose-rich oligosaccharides. Velmanase alfa (VA), a recombinant human lysosomal alpha-mannosidase, is the first enzyme replacement therapy for non-neurological symptoms of AM. Previously, a potential relationship was identified between three MAN2B1 genotype/subcellular localization subgroups (G1, G2, and G3) and AM disease severity. In VA-treated patients with AM, it is unknown if a relationship exists between MAN2B1 genotype/subcellular localization subgroups, antidrug antibodies (ADAs), and infusion-related reactions (IRRs). This pooled analysis evaluated data from 33 VA-treated patients with AM to investigate this relationship. Overall, 10 patients were positive for ADAs, 4 of whom had treatment-emergent ADAs (G1: 3/7 [43%]; G2: 1/17 [6%]; G3: 0/9). Treatment-emergent ADA-positive patients with relatively high titers ( n  = 2; G1: 1012 U/ml and G2: 440 U/ml) experienced mild/moderate IRRs that were well-managed; patients with lower titers ( n  = 2) experienced no IRRs. Overall, changes from baseline in serum oligosaccharides and immunoglobulin G levels did not vary between ADA-positive and ADA-negative patients, suggesting a similar effect of VA treatment regardless of ADA status in most patients. Clinical outcomes (3MSCT and 6MWT) were also similar in most patients regardless of ADA status. While further studies are needed, these data suggest a relationship between MAN2B1 genotype/subcellular localization subgroups and ADA development, with G1 and G2 subgroups more likely to develop ADAs and IRRs. Regardless, this study suggests that ADAs have limited effect on the clinical impact of VA in most patients with AM., Competing Interests: Line Gutte Borgwardt has received consulting fees from Chiesi, the sponsor of the study; Ferdinando Ceravolo was an employee of Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., the sponsor of the study; Giulia Zardi has received consulting fees from Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., the sponsor of the study; Andrea Ballabeni is an employee of Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., the sponsor of the study; Allan Meldgaard Lund has received consulting fees and/or honoraria/travel support from Amicus, BioMarin, Chiesi, Sanofi Genzyme, Shire/Takeda, Recordati, and Sobi as well as grant/research support from Sanofi Genzyme and Shire/Takeda., (© 2022 The Authors. JIMD Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of SSIEM.)

Background As recommended in the current prescribing information, rituximab infusions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) take 4.25 hours for the first infusion and 3.25 hours for subsequent infusions, which is a burden on patients and the health care system. We therefore evaluated the safety of infusing rituximab at a faster rate for an infusion period of 2 hours in patients with RA. Methods Patients with an inadequate response to anti-TNF who were rituximab-naive or -experienced received 2 courses of rituximab: Infusion 1 (Day 1) was administered over the standard 4.25 hours, and Infusions 2 (Day 15), 3 (Day 168) and 4 (Day 182) were administered over a faster 2-hour period. The primary endpoint was incidence of infusion-related reactions (IRRs) associated with Infusion 2. Results Of the 351 patients enrolled, 87% and 13% were rituximab-naive and -experienced, respectively. The incidence (95% CI) of IRRs associated with Infusion 1 was 16.2% (12.5%, 20.5%) and consistent with weighted historical incidence of 20.7% (19.4%, 22.1%). The incidence (95% CI) of IRRs associated with Infusions 2, 3, and 4 compared with respective weighted historical incidences at the standard infusion rate was 6.5% (4.1%, 9.7%) vs 8.1% (7.2%, 9.1%); 5.9% (3.5%, 9.3%) vs 11.5% (10.3%, 12.8%); and 0.7 (0.1%, 2.6%) vs 5.0% (4.2%, 6.0%), respectively. All IRRs were grade 1 or 2, except for 3 grade 3 IRRs associated with Infusion 1 and 2 grade 3 IRRs associated with Infusion 2. Four patients experienced a total of 5 grade 3 IRRs; 3 of these patients continued on to received subsequent infusions at the faster rate. There were no serious IRRs. Conclusion This study demonstrated that rituximab can be administered at the faster infusion rate at the second and subsequent infusions without increasing the rate or severity of IRRs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Trastuzumab has become a mainstay of therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 over expressed breast cancer in nearly all stages of the disease. Like many monoclonal antibodies, trastuzumab is associated with infusionrelated reactions (IRRs) that are not well described, and incidence varies widely between reports (0.7%-40% of patients). Materials and Methods. A retrospective chart review of breast cancer patients who received trastuzumab was conducted. The primary objective was to describe the incidence, risk factors, and management of IRRs during the first 12 weeks of trastuzumab therapy in a general population of breast cancer patients. Results. A total of 197 patients who received trastuzumab (1,788 doses) were evaluated. Thirty-three IRRs were identified in 32 patients, resulting in an incidence of 16.2% of patients and 1.8% of doses. All IRRs were mild or moderate in severity and were successfully managed with supportive medications and/or by temporarily stopping the infusion. All patients received subsequent cycles of trastuzumab, with only one patient experiencing a subsequent reaction. Body mass index, stage of disease, and use of premedications were significantly associated with IRRs by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Conclusion. Overall, these results support that the vast majority of IRRs occur with the first infusion, are mild in severity, and are easily managed. In addition, risk factors were identified that may help to identify a population of patients at increased risk of IRRs who may benefit from premedication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fabry disease (FD) is an X-linked lysosomal disorder caused by mutations in GLA gene resulting in lack of or faulty α-galactosidase A (α-GalA) enzyme. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with recombinant human α-GalA enzyme (agalsidase) is the standard treatment option for FD. Infusion-related reactions (IRRs), with symptoms ranging from rigors, to fever, pain, vomiting, angioedema and diarrhea, are often seen due to immune response against the exogenous enzyme. To elucidate the mechanisms causing the IRRs in FD, eight patients who developed IRRs were investigated. All, except one, tested negative for agalsidase-specific IgE and had normal tryptase levels. Circulating dendritic cells were drastically reduced during IRRs, suggesting possible sequestration to the sites of inflammation. An increase in NK cells and a decrease in T cells were also observed. Cytokines IL-4, IL-8 and TNF-α showed a significant increase, indicating nonspecific degranulation of mast cells. All IRRs were managed successfully using a combination of standard premedications and mast cell stabilizers without any interruption of therapy. Taken together, the results indicate crosstalk between immune cells resulting in IgE-independent mast-cell-specific allergic inflammation. Mast cell stabilizers could be used to control IRRs and for safe reintroduction of agalsidase in patients previously treated with ERT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/aim: To prevent infusion-related reactions (IRRs), H1-antihistamines (H 1 AT) are recommended as a premedication for monoclonal antibodies, such as Ramucirumab (RAM), even though there are H 1 AT-related side effects, such as drowsiness and dizziness. Here, we investigated the safety of H 1 AT-free RAM regimens in patients with solid cancer., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the patients with solid cancer receiving RAM without H 1 AT at Osaka Medical College Hospital between 2015 and 2019., Results: Among the 123 registered patients, 58 were identified as eligible. The total number of RAM infusions was 291, and the median number of RAM administration was 4 cycles (range=1-23 cycles). IRRs were not observed in any patient., Conclusion: Although our data are preliminary and limited, H 1 AT-free RAM regimens may be a treatment option for cancer patients having a significant risk of developing H 1 AT-related side effects. Further studies are needed to confirm the safety of H 1 AT-free RAM regimens., (Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Immunocompromised patients carry a high risk for invasive fungal disease (IFD), which is associated with high mortality., Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of a 4-year experience of amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) utilization for the management of suspected IFD at the Hematology/Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation unit at Makassed General Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon between January 2011 and December 2014. We focused on treatment strategy, response rate, and adverse drug events associated with ABLC therapy. We also reviewed ABLC indications in international guidelines beyond its Food and Drug Administration approval., Results: A total of 89 patients received ABLC therapy for suspected fungal infection. Forty-eight percent were treated for a possible fungal infection, 19% for a problable fungal infection, 12% based on hospital guidelines, and 20% based on treating physician's recommendations. The overall response rate was 71%. Nephrotoxicity occurred in 24% of patients and serum creatinine improved in 10% of these patients. Moderate hypokalemia was observed in 61% of the patients and severe hypokalemia in 10% but was corrected in both cases. Hepatotoxicity was observed in 12% of the patients throughout ABLC therapy. Infusion-related reactions were observed in 36% of the patients. There was a decrease in the incidence of these reactions upon using combination of premedication drugs., Conclusion: In this study, ABLC proved to be an effective and safe option in the management of suspected IFD in immunocompromised patients failing previous therapies.

Obinutuzumab is the second next-generation monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody (after ofatumumab) to enter clinical practice in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Its superiority in association with chlorambucil as compared with chlorambucil alone has led to its approval as a first-line treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia, for patients who are not candidates for a more intensive treatment.