Search

Purpose/objective(s): Bridging radiation therapy (bRT) is increasingly being utilized prior to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). It is unknown how the extent of cytoreduction during bRT impacts outcomes. Materials/ Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with LBCL treated with bRT followed by CAR T-cell therapy. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SUVmean, and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were extracted from F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) scans acquired prior to bRT and between completion of bRT and CAR Tcell infusion. Delta radiomics based on changes of these values were then calculated. The association between delta radiomics and oncologic outcomes [progression-free survival (PFS), freedom from distant progression (FFDP), and local control (LC)] were then examined. Results: Thirty-three sites across 23 patients with LBCL were irradiated. All metabolically active disease was treated in 10 patients. Following bRT, median overall decreases (including unirradiated sites) in MTV, SUVmax, SUVmean, and TLG were 22.2 cc (63.1%), 8.9 (36.8%), 3.4 (31.1%), and 297.9 cc (75.8%), respectively. Median decreases in MTV, SUVmax, SUVmean, and TLG in irradiated sites were 15.6 cc (91.1%), 17.0 (74.6%), 6.8 (55.3%), and 157.0 cc (94.6%), respectively. Median follow-up was 15.2 months. A decrease in SUVmax of at least 54% was associated with improved PFS (24-month PFS: 83.3% vs. 28.1%; p = 0.037) and FFDP (24-month FFDP: 100% vs. 62.4%; p < 0.001). A decrease in MTV of at least 90% was associated with improved FFDP (24-month FFDP: 100% vs. 62.4%; p < 0.001). LC was improved in sites with decreases in SUVmax of at least 71% (24-month LC: 100% vs. 72.7%; p < 0.001). Decreases of MTV by at least 90% (100% vs. 53.3%; p = 0.038) and TLG by at least 95% (100% vs. 56.3%; p = 0.067) were associated with an improved complete response rate. Conclusion: bRT led to substantial reductions in MTV, SUVmax, SUVmean, and TLG. The relative extent of these decreases correlated with improved outcomes after CAR T-cell infusion. Prospective cohorts should validate the value of interim PET following bRT for quantifying changes in disease burden and associated prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Even though cell death modalities elicited by anticancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy have been extensively studied, the ability of anticancer treatments to induce non-cell-autonomous death has never been investigated. By means of multispectral imaging flow-cytometry-based technology, we analyzed the lethal fate of cancer cells that were treated with conventional anticancer agents and co-cultured with untreated cells, observing that anticancer agents can simultaneously trigger cell-autonomous and non-cell-autonomous death in treated and untreated cells. After ionizing radiation, oxaliplatin, or cisplatin treatment, fractions of treated cancer cell populations were eliminated through cell-autonomous death mechanisms, while other fractions of the treated cancer cells engulfed and killed neighboring cells through non-cell-autonomous processes, including cellular cannibalism. Under conditions of treatment with paclitaxel, non-cell-autonomous and cell-autonomous death were both detected in the treated cell population, while untreated neighboring cells exhibited features of apoptotic demise. The transcriptional activity of p53 tumor-suppressor protein contributed to the execution of cell-autonomous death, yet failed to affect the non-cell-autonomous death by cannibalism for the majority of tested anticancer agents, indicating that the induction of non-cell-autonomous death can occur under conditions in which cell-autonomous death was impaired. Altogether, these results reveal that chemotherapy and radiotherapy can induce both non-cell-autonomous and cell-autonomous death of cancer cells, highlighting the heterogeneity of cell death responses to anticancer treatments and the unsuspected potential contribution of non-cell-autonomous death to the global effects of anticancer treatment.

The therapeutic landscape of metastatic prostate cancer has undergone a profound revolution in recent years. In addition to the introduction of novel molecules in the clinics, the field has witnessed a tremendous development of functional imaging modalities adding new biological insights which can ultimately inform tailored treatment strategies, including local therapies. The evolution and rise of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) have been particularly notable in patients with oligometastatic disease, where it has been demonstrated to be a safe and effective treatment strategy yielding favorable results in terms of disease control and improved oncological outcomes. The possibility of debulking all sites of disease, matched with the ambition of potentially extending this treatment paradigm to polymetastatic patients in the not-too-distant future, makes Biology-guided Radiotherapy (BgRT) an attractive paradigm which can be used in conjunction with systemic therapy in the management of patients with metastatic prostate cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Radiation therapy has long been reported to affect tumors distal to the site of irradiation, in what is known as the abscopal effect; the synergy of radiation with immune-oncological agents has also been studied and exploited for greater anti-cancer effect. We believe that PET/CT imaging can offer insight into the mechanism of this synergy and thereby optimize the dosing and timing as well as monitoring the response to and adverse effects of radiation therapy in tandem with immunotherapy. Herein, we offer a commentary to better integrate PET/CT into recently released joint guidelines, to exploit radiation and immunotherapy synergy. [18F]-FDG positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging is widely used to enhance the quality of care in patients diagnosed with cancer. Furthermore, it holds the potential to offer insight into the synergic effect of combining radiation therapy (RT) with immuno-oncological (IO) agents. This is achieved by evaluating treatment responses both at the RT and distant tumor sites, thereby encompassing the phenomenon known as the abscopal effect. In this context, PET/CT can play an important role in establishing timelines for RT/IO administration and monitoring responses, including novel patterns such as hyperprogression, oligoprogression, and pseudoprogression, as well as immune-related adverse events. In this commentary, we explore the incremental value of PET/CT to enhance the combination of RT with IO in precision therapy for solid tumors, by offering supplementary insights to recently released joint guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Since its first approval by the FDA in 2017, tremendous progress has been made in chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, the adoptive transfer of engineered, CAR-expressing T lymphocyte. CAR T cells are all composed of three main elements: an extracellular antigen-binding domain, an intracellular signaling domain responsible for T cell activation, and a hinge that joins these two domains. Continuous improvement has been made in CARs, now in their fifth generation, particularly in the intracellular signaling domain responsible for T cell activation. CAR T cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Nonetheless, the use of CAR T cell therapy for solid tumors has not attained comparable levels of success. Here we review the challenges in achieving effective CAR T cell therapy in solid tumors, and emerging CAR T cells that have shown great promise for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A growing number of clinical trials have been conducted to study the effect of CAR T cell therapy on NSCLC, targeting different types of surface antigens. They include epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), mesothelin (MSLN), prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA), and mucin 1 (MUC1). Potential new targets such as erythropoietin-producing hepatocellular carcinoma A2 (EphA2), tissue factor (TF), and protein tyrosine kinase 7 (PTK7) are currently under investigation in clinical trials. The challenges in developing CAR T for NSCLC therapy and other approaches for enhancing CAR T efficacy are discussed. Finally, we provide our perspective on imaging CAR T cell action by reviewing the two main radionuclide-based CAR T cell imaging techniques, the direct labeling of CAR T cells or indirect labeling via a reporter gene.